Issue |
A&A
Volume 676, August 2023
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A100 | |
Number of page(s) | 18 | |
Section | Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346025 | |
Published online | 17 August 2023 |
Aether scalar tensor theory confronted with weak lensing data at small accelerations
1
Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Ruth-Moufang-Str. 1, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
e-mail: mistele@fias.uni-frankfurt.de
2
Department of Astronomy, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
3
Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539 München, Germany
Received:
30
January
2023
Accepted:
28
June
2023
Context. The recently proposed aether scalar tensor (AeST) model reproduces both the successes of particle dark matter on cosmological scales and those of modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) on galactic scales. But the AeST model reproduces MOND only up to a certain maximum galactocentric radius. Since MOND is known to fit very well to observations at these scales, this raises the question of whether the AeST model comes into tension with data.
Aims. We tested whether or not the AeST model is in conflict with observations using a recent analysis of data for weak gravitational lensing.
Methods. We solved the equations of motion of the AeST model, analyzed the solutions’ behavior, and compared the results to observational data.
Results. The AeST model shows some deviations from MOND at the radii probed by weak gravitational lensing. The data show no clear indication of these predicted deviations.
Key words: galaxies: kinematics and dynamics / gravitational lensing: weak / dark matter / gravitation
© The Authors 2023
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.