Issue |
A&A
Volume 670, February 2023
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A76 | |
Number of page(s) | 8 | |
Section | Numerical methods and codes | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244424 | |
Published online | 08 February 2023 |
Constraining the polarisation flux density and angle of point sources by training a convolutional neural network
1
Departamento de Física, Universidad de Oviedo,
C. Federico García Lorca 18,
33007
Oviedo, Spain
2
Instituto Universitario de Ciencias y Tecnologías Espaciales de Asturias (ICTEA),
C. Independencia 13,
33004
Oviedo, Spain
e-mail: casasjm@uniovi.es
3
Departamento de Informática, Universidad de Oviedo,
Edificio Departamental 1, Campus de Viesques s/n,
33204,
Gijón, Spain
4
Escuela de Ingeniería de Minas,
Energía y Materiales Independencia 13,
33004
Oviedo, Spain
Received:
5
July
2022
Accepted:
24
December
2022
Context. Constraining the polarisation properties of extragalactic point sources is a relevant task not only because they are one of the main contaminants for primordial cosmic microwave background B-mode detection if the tensor-to-scalar ratio is lower than r = 0.001, but also for a better understanding of the properties of radio-loud active galactic nuclei.
Aims. We develop and train a machine learning model based on a convolutional neural network to learn how to estimate the polarisation flux density and angle of point sources embedded in cosmic microwave background images knowing only their positions.
Methods. To train the neural network, we used realistic simulations of patches of 32 × 32 pixels in area at the 217 GHz Planck channel with injected point sources at their centres. The patches also contain a realistic background composed of the cosmic microwave background signal, the Galactic thermal dust, and instrumental noise. We split our analysis into three parts: firstly, we studied the comparison between true and estimated polarisation flux densities for P, Q, and U simulations. Secondly, we analysed the comparison between true and estimated polarisation angles. Finally, we studied the performance of our model with the 217 GHz Planck map and compared our results against the detected sources of the Second Planck Catalogue of Compact Sources (PCCS2).
Results. We find that our model can be used to reliably constrain the polarisation flux density of sources above the 80 mJy level. For this limit, we obtain relative errors of lower than 30% in most of the flux density levels. Training the same network with Q and U maps, the reliability limit is above ±250 mJy when determining the polarisation angle of both Q and U sources. Above that cut, the network can constrain angles with a 1σ uncertainty of ±29° and ±32° for Q and U sources, respectively. We test this neural network against real data from the 217 GHz Planck channel, obtaining similar results to the PCCS2 for some sources; although we also find discrepancies in the 300–400mJy flux density range with respect to the Planck catalogue.
Conclusions. Based on these results, our model appears to be a promising tool for estimating the polarisation flux densities and angles of point sources above 80 mJy in any catalogue with very small computational time requirements.
Key words: techniques: image processing / submillimeter: galaxies / cosmic background radiation
© The Authors 2023
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.