Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 564, April 2014
Article Number A71
Number of page(s) 13
Section Interstellar and circumstellar matter
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322525
Published online 08 April 2014

© ESO, 2014

1. Introduction

The Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) showed that, up to a certain threshold, the i21 cm emission correlates linearly with the far-infrared (FIR) dust continuum at high galactic latitudes (Low et al. 1984; Boulanger & Perault 1988; Boulanger et al. 1996). Despite this linear relationship, previous studies towards high galactic latitudes (e.g. Désert et al. 1988; Reach et al. 1998) find excess FIR radiation associated with molecular gas, which is traced by carbon monoxide (CO) emission (Magnani et al. 1985). Several of these objects show radial velocities relative to the local standard of rest (LSR) between 30 km s-1 ≤ |vLSR| ≤ 90 km s-1 that are difficult to account for with a simple model of galactic rotation. These clouds are classified as intermediate-velocity clouds (IVCs) and, as a subcategory, intermediate-velocity molecular clouds (IVMCs).

Intermediate-velocity clouds are thought to originate from a galactic fountain process (Bregman 2004). Typically they show up with metal abundances close to solar, a traceable dust content, and distances below 5 kpc (Wakker 2001). Commonly, IVCs emit in the FIR (e.g. Planck Collaboration XXIV 2011). Towards many IVCs a diffuse H2 column density of NH2 = 1014−1016 cm-2 is inferred by interstellar absorption line measurements (Richter et al. 2003; Wakker 2006); however, only a few IVMCs are known (Magnani & Smith 2010). Dynamical processes resulting from the motion of IVCs through the halo and their descent onto the galactic disk are thought to play a major role in the process of H2 formation in IVCs (Odenwald & Rickard 1987; Désert et al. 1990; Gillmon & Shull 2006; Guillard et al. 2009). The transition between the atomic and the molecular phase happens at a total hydrogen column density of NH = 2.0−5.0 × 1020 cm-2 (Savage et al. 1977; Reach et al. 1994; Lagache et al. 1998; Gillmon et al. 2006; Gillmon & Shull 2006; Planck Collaboration XXIV 2011).

In this paper we study the gas and dust properties of IVCs and their transition from the atomic to the molecular phase by correlating the i distribution to the FIR dust emission at high galactic latitudes. We are interested in the conditions required for the transition from i to H2 in IVCs at the disk-halo interface.

We use data from the new Effelsberg-Bonn i-Survey (EBHIS, Winkel et al. 2010; Kerp et al. 2011), the Planck Satellite (Planck Collaboration I 2014), and IRIS (Miville-Deschênes & Lagache 2005). Our field of interest has a size of 25 × 25 deg2 centred on galactic coordinates (l, b) = (235°, 65°). This area is located between the Intermediate-Velocity (IV) Arch and IV Spur which are two large structures in the distribution of IVCs (Wakker 2004). In Planck Collaboration XXX (2014) this field is used also in the analysis of the cosmic infrared background.

Section 2 gives the properties of our data in i and the FIR. Section 3 describes the i-FIR correlation in more detail. Section 4 presents the observational results inferred from the i, the FIR, and their correlation for the entire field, while Sect. 5 gives results for two particular IVCs within the field. Section 6 discusses a dynamically driven i-H2 transition with respect to the two IVCs and Sect. 7 summarises our results.

2. Data

Table 1 gives the main characteristics of the different data sets. In the FIR we use data at 353, 545, and 857 GHz from Planck and 3000 GHz from IRIS. These frequencies probe the peak of the FIR dust emission.

The Effelsberg-Bonn i-Survey (EBHIS, Winkel et al. 2010; Kerp et al. 2011) is a new, fully sampled survey of the northern hemisphere in i21 cm line emission above declinations of −5°. FPGA-based spectrometers (Stanko et al. 2005) allow one to conduct in parallel a galactic and extragalactic survey out to redshifts of z ≃ 0.07. The angular resolution is approximately 10.8  ′, and with a channel width of 1.3 km s-1 the rms noise is less than 90 mK. The data is corrected for stray radiation which is especially important for studies of the diffuse interstellar medium (ISM) at high galactic latitudes.

The Planck satellite covers the spectral range between 25 and 1000 GHz (Planck Collaboration I 2014). The High Frequency Instrument (HFI) has bolometer detectors that offer six bands centred on 100, 143, 217, 353, 545, and 857 GHz.

We use the Planck maps that are corrected for zodiacal emission (Planck Collaboration XIV 2014), but no CMB emission is subtracted. The 353 GHz data is transformed from the original KCMB units to MJy sr-1 by applying the conversion factor given in Planck Collaboration IX (2014). No colour correction is done for any FIR frequency.

Infrared dust continuum data is available from the Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) at 12, 25, 60, and 100 μm (Neugebauer et al. 1984). The four IRAS wavelengths have been revised in the Improved Reprocessing of the IRAS Survey (IRIS, Miville-Deschênes & Lagache 2005). They preserve the full angular resolution and perform a thorough absolute calibration. In recent data products the stripe of missing data in IRAS is filled with observations from DIRBE of lower angular resolution.

Table 1

Properties of the i and FIR data.

3. Methods

We correlate the i column density Ni to the FIR intensity Iν at frequency ν. The quantitative correlation of two different data sets like i and the FIR demands a common coordinate grid with the same angular resolution. Hence we convolve the FIR maps with two-dimensional Gaussian functions that have a spatial width given by the full width half maximum (FWHM) fulfilling FWHMHi2=FWHMGauss2+FWHMFIR2\hbox{${\it FWHM}_{\mathrm{\ion{H}{i}}}^{2} ={\it FWHM}_{\mathrm{Gauss}}^{2}+{\it FWHM}_{\mathrm{FIR}}^{2}$}.

At high galactic latitudes the i-FIR correlation is linear (e.g. Boulanger et al. 1996) and it can be written as Iν=Rν+ϵν×NHi,\begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:1} I_{\nu} = R_{\nu} + \epsilon_{\nu} \times N_{\ion{H}{i}}, \end{eqnarray}(1)where ϵν is the dust emissivity per nucleon. A general offset Rν accounts for emission that is not associated with the galactic gas distribution, for example the cosmic infrared background. The values of each pixel of the i and FIR maps are plotted against each other. With standard least-squares techniques the linear parameters and their statistical errors are estimated.

In order to exclude point sources from the fit, we apply a first fit to reject all data points that deviate by more than 3σ from this initial estimate. In a second step, we reject all pixels in which more i emission is in IVCs between −60 km s-1 ≤ vLSR ≤ − 20 km s-1 than in the local gas with −20 km s-1 ≤ vLSR ≤ + 20 km s-1. We do this because of the generally lower dust emissivities of IVCs compared to local gas (Planck Collaboration XXIV 2011), which is expected to bias the fit.

We only quote errors on the emissivities that represent statistical uncertainties. These uncertainties are lower than the true errors (Planck Collaboration XXIV 2011) since we do not consider effects like the cosmic infrared background or residual zodiacal emission.

Equation (1)can be generalised by adding more i components with different dust emissivities. As Peek et al. (2009) show, this superposition can easily produce false estimates for a FIR dim cloud behind a bright local foreground. In this paper we concentrate on two bright IVCs which completely dominate the emission along their lines of sight. Thus, a superposition of several components is not required in order to model their FIR brightness.

The emissivity ϵν in Eq. (1)depends on the dust-to-gas ratio, but also on gas and dust properties. Deviations from a linear behaviour are mostly due to local variations of the amount of neutral atomic gas where significant amounts of the hydrogen are in either ionised or molecular forms. These species will be missing from the i-FIR correlation. Above an empirical threshold of Ni = 2 × 1020 cm-2, molecular hydrogen steepens the correlation (e.g. Planck Collaboration XXIV 2011), which can be inferred without tracer molecules like CO (Reach et al. 1998). This steepening is not due to i absorption, since opacity corrections are relevant for Ni > 1021 cm-2 (Strasser & Taylor 2004) which is much more than the column density observed with EBHIS in galactic cirrus clouds.

thumbnail Fig. 1

Left: column density map of EBHIS integrated between −100 km s-1 ≤ vLSR ≤ + 100 km s-1. Right: corresponding unsmoothed Planck map at 857 GHz. In both figures the black contours mark Ni at the levels of the colour bar tick labels of the column density map.

4. Analysis of the entire field

In this section we present the analyses of the entire field: first the i-FIR correlation, second the modified black-body fitting and third the estimation of molecular hydrogen column densities from the FIR emission.

4.1. Global correlation of gas and dust

An i column density map of the entire studied field integrated across −100 km s-1 ≤ vLSR ≤ + 100 km s-1 and the corresponding Planck data at 857 GHz are shown in Fig. 1. From these maps the close correlation between gas and dust is evident. The field is located near a region of low Ni which is surrounded by the IV Arch and Spur. From the bottom towards the north-east there are large amounts of local gas that is part of high-latitude i-shells probably directly connected to Loop I and the North Polar Spur (Puspitarini & Lallement 2012).

We create i-FIR correlation plots (Fig. 2, left for 857 GHz) and use Eq. (1)to fit dust emissivities which are listed in Table 2 (second column). The correlation parameters are estimated for Ni ≤ 2.0 × 1020 cm-2 which is the empirical threshold for the i-H2 transition found in other studies and also for one particular IVC within the field (Sect. 5.2).

thumbnail Fig. 2

Left: correlation plot Ni vs. 857 GHz for the entire field. The black solid line is our best fit of Eq. (1)to the data below Ni = 2 × 1020 cm-2. Right: residual map at 857 GHz. The residuals are derived by subtracting for each pixel the FIR sky brightness calculated from Eq. (1)using the linear-fit parameters. The black contours denote Ni as in Fig. 1. The black rectangles mark the locations of two i clouds (IVC 1 on the left, IVC 2 on the right) which are presented in more detail in Sect. 5.

There is a large scatter around a linear relation (Fig. 2, left). Many clouds in the field have a FIR excess, but some also have a deficiency in brightness. We obtain a residual map (Fig. 2, right) by subtracting in each pixel the FIR intensity that is expected from Eq. (1)using the fitted linear parameters. In particular we find two IVCs with completely different FIR emission despite their similarity in i. These two clouds are marked by the black boxes in Fig. 2 (right). Section 5 gives a detailed description of these two IVCs.

4.2. Maps of dust temperature and optical depth

Our FIR data probe the thermal dust emission. We fit modified black-body spectra of the form Iν(τ857,β,TD)=τ857×(νν0)β×Bν(TD).\begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:2} I_{\nu}(\tau_{857},\beta,T_{\mathrm{D}}) = \tau_{857} \times \left( \frac{\nu}{\nu_{0}} \right)^{\beta} \times B_{\nu}(T_{\mathrm{D}}). \end{eqnarray}(2)Parameters are the dust optical depth τ857, which we choose at 857 GHz; the dust temperature TD; and the spectral index β of the power law emissivity (ν/ν0)β\hbox{$\left(\nu/\nu_{0}\right)^{\,\beta}$}. We normalise the dust emission spectrum to ν0 = 857 GHz. From Planck Collaboration XXIV (2011) we adopt β = 1.8. Furthermore, we smooth the FIR data to the lowest resolution, which is the 353 GHz map. The noise values given in Planck Collaboration I (2014) and Miville-Deschênes & Lagache (2005) are used as weights for the modified black-body fits.

There may be offsets in the FIR data that are not related to the galactic gas distribution. These are corrected for by subtracting offsets that are estimated in Planck Collaboration XIX (2011), where reference pixels with Ni ≤ 2.0 × 1019 cm-2 are used to infer the smooth background FIR radiation.

By fitting Eq. (2)in each pixel independently, we derive maps of dust temperature TD and dust optical depth τ857 (Fig. 3). The dust temperatures have a median value of 21.2 K. The dust optical depths τ857 cover about two orders of magnitude. Both TD and τ857 correlate to gaseous structures.

In Fig. 4 (left, middle) we compare dust temperatures to dust optical depths and i column densities. In general, low dust temperatures are associated with large optical depths and vice versa (Fig. 4, left). A similar correlation exists between TD and Ni (Fig. 4, middle). The IVC gas appears to contain warmer dust grains compared to local structures confirming previous studies (e.g. Planck Collaboration XXIV 2011). This is related to the galactic fountain origin of IVCs by which dust grains are shattered and the number of very small grains is increased (see e.g. Jones & Nuth 2011, for a discussion of the destruction and survival of dust grains in the ISM in general).

We note that the fitted dust temperatures do not reflect the actual dust temperatures (Planck Collaboration XXIV 2011). A simple modified black body is an average over the line of sight and its parameters are biased towards regions of bright emission. Nevertheless, spatial variations of this fitted dust temperature are related to changes in the spectral energy distribution.

Table 2

Dust emissivities across the entire field, IVC 1 and IVC 2.

thumbnail Fig. 3

Maps of dust temperature TD (left) and dust optical depth τ857 (right) at the resolution of the 353 GHz data. Black contours mark Ni as in Fig. 1.

thumbnail Fig. 4

Dependence of dust optical depth τ857 (left), i column density Ni (middle), and H2 column density NH2 (right) on dust temperature TD. The TD − τ857 plot is done for FIR data at the resolution of the 353 GHz data while the other two plots are for FIR data smoothed to the EBHIS resolution. The black contours show the number density distribution of all data points. The blue contour traces the pixels that contain more i between −20 km s-1 ≤ vLSR ≤ +20 km s-1 than in the IVC range −60 km s-1 ≤ vLSR ≤ −20 km s-1, whereas the red contour traces pixels that have more i in the IVC regime. In Sect. 4.3 we describe how we derive an H2 map from the FIR excess emission. Negative NH2 are a result of the derivation.

4.3. Estimation of the molecular hydrogen column density

The thermal dust emission acts as a tracer of the total gas column density. The linear i-FIR correlation covers the range where hydrogen is neutral, whereas the FIR excess emission traces H2. Thus, maps of molecular hydrogen column density can be calculated from the total FIR emission (e.g. Dame et al. 2001).

4.3.1. FIR emission and molecular hydrogen

We assume that the excess emission is solely due to H2. Any influences due to H+ are considered to be negligible and changes of the dust-to-gas ratio or emissivity properties of the grains are omitted. The simple i-FIR correlation in Eq. (1)is generalised to account for H2: Iν=Rν+ϵν×NH=Rν+ϵν×(NHi+2NH2).\begin{eqnarray} I_{\nu} = R_{\nu} + \epsilon_{\nu} \times N_{\mathrm{H}} = R_{\nu} + \epsilon_{\nu} \times (N_{\ion{H}{i}} + 2 N_{\mathrm{H}_{2}}). \end{eqnarray}(3)Solving for NH2 yields NH2=12(IνRνϵνNHi).\begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:nh2-map} N_{\mathrm{H}_{2}} = \frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{I_{\nu}-R_{\nu}}{\epsilon_{\nu}}-N_{\ion{H}{i}} \right). \end{eqnarray}(4)In each pixel of the map we calculate NH2 from the total i column density and the 857 GHz data smoothed to the EBHIS resolution of 10.8  ′. For the correlation parameters, we use the values derived for the entire field (Table 2, first column).

A map of NH2 is shown in Fig. 5; i structures with local velocities are prominent, with NH2 in the range 1 − 4 × 1020 cm-2. Negative H2 column densities result from the derivation and are not physically meaningful. We do not clip these values in order to show the uncertainties of the H2 map.

In Fig. 4 (right) the relation between TD and NH2 is shown. For TD ≳ 22 K no significant amount of H2 is observed, neither in local nor IVC gas.

The correlation parameters Rν and ϵν that are applied in Eq. (4)are statistically well constrained. In order to estimate an uncertainty for our NH2 map, we use the scatter in the residuals from the i-FIR correlation after subtracting the best fit. For 857 GHz this results in a 1σ scatter of 0.2 × 1020 cm-2 for NH2. In addition to this statistical error, systematic errors contribute, such as local changes in the grain emissivity, in metallicity, or in dust-to-gas ratio, all of which may mimic the presence of H2.

The molecular gas we infer in the field is not observed in the large-scale CO survey on the northern high-latitude sky (Hartmann et al. 1998). Furthermore, the all-sky maps of CO emission extracted from the Planck foreground modelling also do not contain any CO in this area of the sky (Planck Collaboration XIII 2014).

4.3.2. Validation of the NH2 map

The NH2 map in Fig. 5 is derived directly from the 857 GHz intensity and the i column density using Eq. (4). Together, i and H2 approximate the distribution of the total hydrogen column density NH. The dust optical depths τ857 also trace NH, in a manner completely independent from Eq. (4), since τ857 is obtained from modified black-body fits (Eq. (2)) to the FIR spectra.

For the validation of our H2 map, we compare the total hydrogen column density NH = Ni + 2NH2 to the dust optical depth τ857. For this, negative NH2 values are clipped. In Fig. 6 we plot NH against τ857 for each pixel of the entire field. Above NH = 5 × 1020 cm-2 we fit a linear function to the data, yielding the slope τ857/NH ≃ 5.1 × 10-26 cm-2. This agrees well with the value of 5.1 × 10-26 cm-2 for 857 GHz given by Boulanger et al. (1996). Varying the fitting threshold in the range 4−6 × 1020 cm-2 results in values of τ857/NH which range between 5.0−5.3 × 10-26 cm-2. Thus Eq. (4)gives a good approximation of the molecular hydrogen column densities from the FIR intensity and the i distribution directly.

Figure 6 shows a significant enhancement of τ857 with respect to the linear fit below NH ≃ 2 × 1020 cm-2. This deviation is probably related to an increasing dust contribution from ionised hydrogen which is not considered here. In principle, a map of H+ can be derived from the NH − τ857 correlation by shifting the points above the linear fit towards higher NH.

thumbnail Fig. 5

Map of molecular hydrogen column density NH2 with a 1-σ uncertainty of 0.2 × 1020 cm-2. Negative values result from the derivation and are not physically meaningful. Black contours mark Ni as in Fig. 1.

5. Analysis of individual clouds

In the following we focus on two IVCs distinguished by their different FIR properties, as is evident from the global residuals in Fig. 2 (right), where the locations of the clouds are given by the black rectangles. The FIR-dim IVC at the top-left of the field (IVC 1) belongs to the IV Spur, the FIR-bright cloud (IVC 2) to the IV Arch.

thumbnail Fig. 6

Comparison between the estimated total hydrogen column densities NH using Eq. (4)and the fitted dust optical depth τ857 from modified black-body fits (Eq. (2)). For NH ≥ 5 × 1020 cm-2 a linear relation is fitted and shown by the black line.

5.1. IVC 1

The cloud IVC 1 is located at (RA, Dec) = (11h52m, 20°30′) and it is FIR dim. Désert et al. (1988) mention this region as a FIR-deficient IVC at −30 km s-1, although the cloud structure cannot be resolved by their angular resolution of 40′ in i.

In Fig. 7 the i-FIR correlations are shown for 857 GHz and 3000 GHz and for i integrated between −100 km s-1 ≤ vLSR ≤ 100 km s-1. For IVC 1 we fit Eq. (1)to the entire data range, since the correlation is linear throughout. The resulting dust emissivities ϵνIVC1\hbox{$\epsilon_{\nu}^{\mathrm{IVC\,1}}$} are compiled in Table 2 (third column). In the Planck frequency range the emissivities are lower than our estimated values over the entire field. There is no indication of FIR excess emission such as would indicate significant amounts of molecular hydrogen. In the CO survey performed by Hartmann et al. (1998), IVC 1 is not detected.

The i spectrum at the peak brightness temperature is shown in Fig. 8 (top). It is a two-component spectral profile consisting of a bright line with FWHM ≃ 4.5 km s-1 centred on −35.2 km s-1 and a second fainter one at −38.8 km s-1 with FWHM ≃ 10.0 km s-1. About 50% of the i is in the colder phase. In the spectrum there is not much i at other radial velocities. A column density map of IVC 1 integrated over the spectral range between −60 km s-1 ≤ vLSR ≤ − 20 km s-1 is presented in Fig. 9. This shows a peak value of Ni ≃ 3.9 × 1020 cm-2. The cloud consists of several cold clumps that are well connected in i. Its morphology is curved and filamentary.

thumbnail Fig. 7

i-FIR correlations for IVC 1 and IVC 2 at 857 GHz (left) and 3000 GHz (right). The i is integrated between −100 km s-1 ≤ vLSR ≤ + 100 km s-1. The black solid line is the linear fit applying Eq. (1)for IVC 1 and the dashed black line for IVC 2. For IVC 2 the fit is restricted to Ni ≤ 2.0 × 1020 cm-2, above which a FIR excess due to H2 is evident. For IVC 2 the spread in Ni for given Iν is due to a second FIR maximum that is not associated with an i peak (Fig. 12).

The dust spectrum of IVC 1 at its maximum Ni is shown in Fig. 10 (top). The emission is well approximated by a modified black body with β = 1.8. The fitted dust parameters are given in Table 3.

5.2. IVC 2

5.2.1. i and FIR data

The cloud IVC 2 is located at the top right of the field at (RA, Dec) = (10h52m, 25°). The cloud is selected because of its bright FIR emission and its similarity to IVC 1 in i.

In Fig. 7 the i-FIR correlation plots are presented. The linear fits are performed below Ni ≤ 2.0  ×  1020 cm-2 where a linear model is thought to be valid. This is the threshold we also apply for the entire field (Sect. 4.1). At the lowest Ni, the cloud’s FIR emission is equal to that of IVC1 (Fig. 7), although the fitted FIR emissivities of IVC 2 are notably larger (Table 2, fourth column). The emissivity increases even more when larger column densities are considered.

The i spectrum at the highest brightness temperature (Fig. 8, bottom) resembles the spectrum of IVC 1. It is well approximated by two Gaussians with FWHM ≃ 5.1 km s-1 centred on −40.0 km s-1 and FWHM ≃ 11.5 km s-1 at −37.0 km s-1. In IVC 2 about 70% of the i is in the colder phase. As with IVC 1, there is not much i at different radial velocities in the spectrum. Figure 11 shows a column density map integrated between −60 km s-1 ≤ vLSR ≤ −20 km s-1 with a maximum of Ni ≃ 3.1 × 1020 cm-2, which is less than for IVC 1. Structures emerge from the central core in several directions showing other cold clumps.

The dust spectrum of IVC 2 at its maximum Ni is shown in Fig. 10 (bottom). As for IVC 1, the emission is well described by a modified black body with β = 1.8. The fitted dust parameters are given in Table 3. The dust optical depth in IVC 2 is about four times larger, and the fitted grain temperatures are slightly lower, than in IVC 1.

The angular resolution of the FIR data is higher than in the i (Table 1). Indeed IVC 2 shows more structure in the FIR than in i: east of the central core a second maximum is evident in the FIR only (Fig. 12). In the i-FIR correlation of IVC 2 (Fig. 7), this second FIR peak is causing the large spread in Ni for given Iν. This second FIR peak is fitted with (τ857, TD) = ((5.4 ± 0.1) × 10-5, 17.7 ± 0.1 K), thus it has an even larger dust optical depth and lower dust temperature.

thumbnail Fig. 8

i spectra of IVC 1 (top) and IVC 2 (bottom) at their maximum brightness temperature. Both spectra are fitted by two Gaussians plus a constant offset.

5.2.2. H2 and CO data

Désert et al. (1990) report on pointed 12CO observations of this particular cloud. The pointing positions are indicated in Fig. 12 by the black diamonds. They detect the central core in 12CO(1 → 0) and the eastern FIR-peak in 12CO(2 → 1). The CO emission is at vLSR ≃ −40 km s-1 which is consistent with the radial velocity of the i (Fig. 8, bottom). Désert et al. report on highly varying line intensities within two beams which indicates small-scale structure in the cloud. From CO they infer NH2 = 1020−1021 cm-2. Désert et al. conclude that IVC 2 is a molecular cloud at high radial velocity.

Our derived H2 column densities (Sect. 4.3) for IVC 2 are in the range 1−2 × 1020 cm-2. Its largest molecular content is found at the eastern peak with NH2 = 2.3 × 1020 cm-2. We estimate H2 column densities from data with an angular resolution of 10.8′. The CO spectra of Désert et al. were obtained with a telescope beam of 60″ and 14″ which cannot be compared directly to our results since they probe different spatial scales. Désert et al. use a conversion factor of XCO = 2.5  ×  1020 cm-2 (K km s-1)-1 which is inherently a source of uncertainty for an individual cloud of sub-solar metallicity. Nevertheless, we can state that their estimates are compatible with what we find for IVC 2.

The molecular fraction fH2 is calculated by fH2=2NH2NHi+2NH2=2NH2NH·\begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:4} f_{\mathrm{H}_{2}}=\frac{2N_{\mathrm{H}_{2}}}{N_{\ion{H}{i}}+2N_{\mathrm{H}_{2}}}=\frac{2N_{\mathrm{H}_{2}}}{N_{\mathrm{H}}}\cdot \end{eqnarray}(5)By summing up Ni and NH2 in each pixel of the cloud’s core, the total molecular fraction obtained is fH2IVC20.4\hbox{$f_{\mathrm{H}_{2}}^{\mathrm{IVC\,2}}\simeq0.4$}.

With the estimated H2 column densities we analyse the shielding conditions for H2 and CO. Lee et al. (1996) calculate the corresponding shielding efficiencies. In their Table 10 they give the H2 self-shielding efficiencies θ(NH2) for different H2 column densities. For NH2 ≃ 2 × 1020 cm-2 they find θ(NH2) ≃ 7 × 10-6. Thus the molecular hydrogen in IVC 2 is efficiently self-shielding.

For CO formation one has to consider CO self-shielding, H2, and dust shielding (Lee et al. 1996). Lee et al. estimate the shielding efficiencies for these three mechanisms (their Table 11). Taking the correspondence of NH2 to NCO from Pineda et al. (2010, their Fig. 14) which they derive for the Taurus molecular cloud, we assume that for IVC 2 NCO ≤ 1014 cm-2. We adopt NCO = 1014 cm-2, NH2 = 2 × 1020 cm-2, and NH = 7.5 × 1020 cm-2 which gives Av ≃ 0.4 (Predehl & Schmitt 1995). The total shielding efficiency for IVC 2 concerning CO is the product of the three contributing shielding mechanisms: θ1(CO)θ2(NH2)θ3(Av) ≃ 0.9 × 0.7 × 0.1 ≃ 0.1. Thus, the CO molecules are well shielded by dust mostly and CO is expected to be found within IVC 2.

thumbnail Fig. 9

Column density map of IVC 1 integrated between −60 km s-1 ≤ vLSR ≤ −20 km s-1. The black contours mark Ni at the levels of the colour bar tick labels. The white contour encloses the core of the IVC which is analysed in further detail in Sect. 5.4. The white circle at the bottom left gives the angular resolution of EBHIS.

thumbnail Fig. 10

FIR dust spectra and fitted modified black bodies with β = 1.8. The spectra are taken at the position of the largest Ni for IVC 1 (top) and IVC 2 (bottom). The fitted dust parameters are (τ857, TD)IVC 1 = ((8.3 ± 0.4) × 10-6, 21.2 ± 0.2 K) and (τ857, TD)IVC 2 = ((3.2 ± 0.1) × 10-5, 19.1 ± 0.2 K).

5.3. Metallicities and distances

In order to derive absolute quantities such as particle densities and cloud masses for the two IVCs, we need a distance estimate. The metallicity is of similar importance for the amount of dust and the formation of molecules.

The cloud IVC 1 is most likely part of the IV Spur and IVC 2 of the IV Arch. From absorption spectroscopy, near solar abundances are estimated for the IV Arch and slightly less in the IV Spur (Wakker 2001; Richter et al. 2001; Savage & Sembach 1996). We note that these measurements yield precise values for specific lines of sight only. The two clouds could have different metallicities. However, we expect them to have a comparable metallicity because of their equal FIR brightness at the lowest Ni (Fig. 7).

Since there is no accurate distance measurement for either IVC 1 or IVC 2, we constrain the distance by several different indicators. Stellar absorption lines restrict the distance to both IV Arch and Spur to the range 0.3 − 2.1 kpc (Wakker 2001). Similarly, Puspitarini & Lallement (2012) estimate distances in the range 95 − 157 pc to the gas with declinations δ ≤ 10° at the bottom of our field. In addition they report on a negative velocity structure between −40 km s-1 ≤ vLSR ≤ −20 km s-1 for which they detect no absorption. This IVC gas is at a minimal distance of 200 pc, which leads Puspitarini & Lallement to the conclusion that the IVCs are probably not associated with the local i shells. A distance estimate for IVC 2 in the range 12−400 pc is given by Wesselius & Fejes (1973) based on calcium absorption lines.

To constrain the distance of both IVCs more accurately, we compare the ROSAT soft X-ray shadows (Snowden et al. 2000) to the shadow of the molecular IVC 135+54 for which Benjamin et al. (1996) establish a distance of 355 ± 95 pc by interstellar absorption lines. Because of their high column densities (Ni ≥ 3 × 1020 cm-2), all three IVCs can be considered to be opaque for soft X-rays originating from beyond (Kerp 2003). Hence, the observed soft X-ray count rates towards the IVCs only trace the emission from the galactic foreground plasma.

In the catalogue of soft X-ray shadows compiled by Snowden et al. (2000), IVC 1 is listed as cloud 273, IVC 2 as cloud 241, and our reference cloud IVC 135+54 as cloud 182. Assuming that for IVC 135+54 the soft X-ray count rate and its uncertainty fully correspond to the distance estimate of Benjamin et al. (1996), one can evaluate distances for IVC 1 and IVC 2 from their count rates. This yields DIVC 1 = 420 ± 190 pc and DIVC 2 = 510 ± 140 pc. Considering the uncertainties in the ROSAT count rates and the inaccuracies in transforming them into a distance, we adopt the distance estimate D = 0.4 kpc for both IVC 1 and IVC 2. This is compatible with all the other distance indicators we have.

thumbnail Fig. 11

Column density map of IVC 2 integrated between −60 km s-1 ≤ vLSR ≤ −20 km s-1. The black contours mark Ni at the levels of the colour bar tick labels. The white contour encloses the core of the IVC which is analysed in further detail in Sect. 5.4. The white circle at the bottom left gives the angular resolution of EBHIS.

thumbnail Fig. 12

Column density map of IVC 2 overlayed with the unsmoothed 857 GHz data as black contours. A second FIR peak is located east of the i core, but it is not evident in i, implying that this structure is unresolved with our i data. The pointing centres of the Désert et al. (1990) CO observations are given by the two black diamonds. Their corresponding beams are smaller than one pixel. The white circles indicate the angular resolution of EBHIS (larger) and Planck (smaller).

Table 3

Properties of the cores of IVC 1 and IVC 2 for a distance of D = 0.4 kpc.

5.4. Estimation of cloud parameters

To characterise the clouds more completely, we estimate the following parameters:

  • An upper limit on the kinetic gastemperature Tkin is obtained from the i line width Δv (Kalberla & Kerp 2009, their Eq. (4)). In addition to Doppler broadening, turbulence and substructure also contribute to the spectral line.

  • The physical size d is estimated from the angular size and the distance D, assuming a circular cloud.

  • The volume density ni is considered to be constant inside a spherically symmetric cloud of physical size d.

  • The i mass Mi of a cloud is estimated by spatially integrating over Ni given an estimate for the distance D.

    thumbnail Fig. 13

    Position–velocity (PV) diagrams of IVC 1 (left) integrated between 11h57m ≥ RA ≥ 11h45m and IVC 2 (right) integrated between 10h54m ≥ RA ≥ 10h48m. The white lines indicate the orientation of the IVCs in PV space showing a velocity gradient which is interpreted as evidence for interactions of the clouds with the surrounding medium.

  • According to Hildebrand (1983), the dust mass MD of a cloud is calculated from the observed FIR brightness by MD=IνΩD2Bν(TD)×43aρDQνI857ΩD2B857(TD)×0.21gcm-2\begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:3} M_{\mathrm{D}} = \frac{I_{\nu} \Omega D^{2}}{B_{\nu}(T_{\mathrm{D}})} \times \frac{\frac{4}{3}a\rho_{\mathrm{D}}}{Q_{\nu}} \simeq \frac{I_{857} \Omega D^{2}}{B_{857}(T_{\mathrm{D}})} \times 0.21\,\mathrm{g}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2} \end{eqnarray}(6)with the FIR intensity Iν, the solid angle Ω of the cloud, the distance D, the grain radius a, the grain emissivity Qν, and the grain density ρD. We estimate the dust mass for 857 GHz with the values for a, Qν, and ρD given by Hildebrand.

Many cloud parameters depend on the distance, for which we use D = 0.4 kpc (Sect. 5.3). We calculate the physical quantities for the cores which are marked by the white contour in Figs. 9 and 11. We use a watershed algorithm (Beucher & Lantuéjoul 1979) to determine the extent of these cores.

The results for the parameters are compiled in Table 3. We note that for IVC 2 no molecular hydrogen is taken into account; H2 adds to the total particle density and the total gas mass.

For the i surface mass density, we obtain for the IVC cores ΣHiIVC12.1Mpc-2\hbox{$\Sigma_{\ion{H}{i}}^{\mathrm{IVC\,1}}\simeq 2.1 \,{M}_{\odot}\,\mathrm{pc}^{-2}$} and ΣHiIVC21.9Mpc-2\hbox{$\Sigma_{\ion{H}{i}}^{\mathrm{IVC\,2}}\simeq 1.9 \,{M}_{\odot}\,\mathrm{pc}^{-2}$}. We calculate a corresponding dust surface mass density which results in ΣDIVC10.0073Mpc-2\hbox{$\Sigma_{\mathrm{D}}^{\mathrm{IVC\,1}}\simeq 0.0073 \,{M}_{\odot}\,\mathrm{pc}^{-2}$} and ΣDIVC20.0163Mpc-2\hbox{$\Sigma_{\mathrm{D}}^{\mathrm{IVC\,2}}\simeq 0.0163 \,{M}_{\odot}\,\mathrm{pc}^{-2}$}. The i surface density is comparable, but in IVC 2 the dust surface density is more than twice as large.

Both IVC 1 and IVC 2 are not self-gravitating. Their Jeans masses, derived from the i data, are larger than their gas masses by two orders of magnitude. This is still true when H2 is considered. However, the gas temperature estimated from the i serves only as an upper limit. Locally, the gas is certainly colder when we consider the CO within IVC 2, possibly even below 30 K (see e.g. Glover & Clark 2012). Nevertheless, we do not expect IVC 2 to form stars.

5.5. Interactions of IVCs with the ambient medium

Indications for dynamical interactions of IVC 1 and IVC 2 with their environment are inferred from positionvelocity (PV) diagrams (Fig. 13) that show the velocity changes over the IVC filaments. The PV diagrams are integrated between 11h57m ≥ RA ≥ 11h45m for IVC 1 and 10h54m ≥ RA ≥ 10h48m for IVC 2. The white diagonal lines in the diagrams mark the location and orientation of the two IVCs in PV space, revealing a change of vLSR over the IVCs and the filaments to which they are connected. These gradients are probably due to interactions of the clouds with their surroundings. The PV-diagrams also reveal the clumpy structure along the IVC filaments.

The isothermal speed of sound in an ideal gas with the kinetic temperature of IVC 1 or IVC 2 is about 2.0 km s-1 for the colder components. Thus the observed radial LSR velocity gradient within the individual IVCs significantly exceeds the speed of sound in the cold neutral medium. If this gradient is physical and not the result of projection effects, it implies that the IVC cores are punching through the galactic halo medium while material is being stripped off and decelerated. A supersonic deceleration would build up shocks that compress and fragment the clouds (e.g. McKee & Hollenbach 1980).

6. Discussion: a dynamical i-H2 transition

We observe two IVCs in close proximity to each other that show respectively a deficiency (IVC 1) and an excess (IVC 2) in FIR emission, despite their similarities in i and in their environmental conditions:

  • Both IVCs consist of distinct cold clumps marked by narrowspectral i lines with FWHM ≃ 5 km s-1. Their i profiles can be characterised by this cold component, plus a warmer component with FWHM ≃ 11 km s-1. About 50% of the i emission of IVC 1 originates from the cold gas, whereas for IVC 2 70% is in the cold phase. It is remarkable that for IVC 1 we estimate Ni ≃ 3.9 × 1020 cm-2, which is significantly larger than for IVC 2 with Ni ≃ 3.1 × 1020 cm-2 (Sects. 5.1, 5.2).

  • To constrain the distances to both IVCs, we compare the ROSAT soft X-ray shadows of the IVCs to the molecular IVC 135+54 for which there is a firm distance bracket. We conclude that IVC 1 and IVC 2 have a similar distance similar to IVC 135+54 of about D = 0.4 kpc (Sect. 5.3).

  • Both IVCs show an equal i surface mass density. However, the dust surface mass density of IVC 2 is more than twice as large as that of IVC 1 (Sect. 5.4).

  • Both IVCs have radial velocities between −35 km s-1 and −40 km s-1. They exhibit a velocity gradient of 10 km s-1 (Sect. 5.5).

  • From the FIR excess emission we estimate molecular column densities for IVC 2 of NH2 = 1−2 × 1020 cm-2 which gives a total molecular fraction of fH2IVC20.4\hbox{$f^{\mathrm{IVC\,2}}_{\mathrm{H}_{2}}\simeq0.4$} (Sect. 4.3).

In order to reconcile the similarities in i properties with the low FIR emission of IVC 1 and the excess emission of IVC 2 due to H2, we propose that IVC 1 and IVC 2 represent different states in a phase transition from atomic to molecular clouds at the disk-halo interface. The descent of IVCs onto the galactic disk is thought to compress the gas which increases the pressure locally, triggering the fast formation of H2 (Odenwald & Rickard 1987; Désert et al. 1990; Weiß et al. 1999; Gillmon et al. 2006; Guillard et al. 2009).

6.1. The scenario of interacting IVCs

According to the galactic fountain model, metal enriched disk material is ejected via supernovae into the disk–halo interface (Bregman 2004). This rising gas is warm and ionised as a result of the large energies involved in the expulsion.

After culmination, the ejected matter falls back onto the disk. The descent from the culmination point is accompanied by an increase in gas pressure due to ram pressure. Electrons and protons recombine and form the warm neutral medium (WNM). When the ram pressure becomes larger than the thermal pressure within the cloud, shocks are induced that propagate through the IVC. These shocks enhance the pressure locally by which the formation time of H2 is decreased (Guillard et al. 2009). The shocks trigger cooling of the WNM into condensations of the cold neutral medium (CNM) where H2 forms.

The ram pressure not only compresses the cloud, but also causes a deceleration. This has been modelled by Heitsch & Putman (2009). Eventually, the IVC may reach local velocities which make it indistinguishable from local clouds. Since there are only a few molecular IVCs (IVMCs) known (Magnani & Smith 2010), a certain fine tuning of the parameters seems necessary in order to create an IVMC that we can detect.

In the following we try to evaluate the scenario of ram pressure induced H2 formation by looking at the pressures and the timescales involved in the cases of IVC 1 and IVC 2.

6.2. H2 formation in compressed gas

Bergin et al. (2004) write the time evolution of the H2 number density nH2 as dnH2dt=Rgr(T)nH2nH[ζcr+ζdiss(NH2,AV)]nH2\begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:nh2} \frac{\mathrm{d}n_{\mathrm{H}_{2}}}{\mathrm{d}t}=R_{\mathrm{gr}}(T)n_{\mathrm{H}_{2}}n_{\mathrm{H}} - [\zeta_{\mathrm{cr}}+\zeta_{\mathrm{diss}}(N_{\mathrm{H}_{2}},A_{\mathrm{V}})]n_{\mathrm{H}_{2}} \end{eqnarray}(7)with the temperature dependent grain formation rate Rgr(T), the destruction rate by cosmic rays ζcr, and the photo-dissociation rate ζdiss(NH2,AV). The dissociation rate ζdiss depends on the self-shielding of H2 (Draine & Bertoldi 1996).

Equation (7)relates the formation time of H2 to the particle density and hence the pressure. We refer to the late stages of the infall during which the IVC has accumulated particle densities ni > 1 cm-3. Compressed gas is able to cool quickly (Sect. 6.3) which results in large particle densities.

In our picture ram pressure acts on the cloud because of its movement through the ISM. The ram pressure pram=ρ×v2\begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:ram-p} p_{\mathrm{ram}} = \rho \times v^{2} \end{eqnarray}(8)depends on the mass density ρ of the surrounding medium and the relative velocity v between cloud and surroundings. The cloud moves through the galactic halo, for which we take the Milky Way model of Kalberla & Dedes (2008) to get estimates of the halo densities and pressures. We calculate the associated ram pressure for several velocities at the distances 0.5 kpc ≤ D ≤ 3 kpc in the line of sight towards IVC 2. In Fig. 14 we compare the ram pressure with the halo pressure. We note that we can observe only the radial velocity component. Any additional tangential velocity component is unknown.

At one point the ram pressure exceeds the halo pressure for all considered cloud velocities. The distance at which the ram pressure and the halo pressure are equal increases with cloud velocity. Thus, ram pressure interactions are expected to be important for all IVCs. For IVC 1 and IVC 2, which are at a distance of D ≃ 0.4 kpc (Sect. 5.3), the ram pressure is at least twice as large as the halo pressure. Hence, perturbations driven by ram pressure are not only possible, but likely. Indications for this are for example the morphology of the clouds (Sects. 5.1 and 5.2) and their velocity gradients (Sect. 5.5).

thumbnail Fig. 14

Comparison of modelled halo pressure from Kalberla & Dedes (2008) to ram pressure at the given distance in the line of sight towards IVC 2. The ram pressure is calculated from Eq. (8)using the modelled halo density and the chosen cloud velocities 40, 60, 80, and 100 km s-1.

We emphasise the importance of magnetic fields for cloud compression and condensation. In the galactic halo there are magnetic fields of a few μG which can be important for gas dynamics (Putman et al. 2012). Hartmann et al. (2001) show that clouds can form preferentially at kinks or bends in the magnetic field.

6.3. Timescales

From isobaric cooling models Guillard et al. (2009) find an inverse scaling between the H2 formation timescale and the pressure which can be approximated by tH2[yr]7×105fdust(2×105[Kcm-3]pth)0.95·\begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:th2} t_{\mathrm{H}_{2}}[\mathrm{yr}]\simeq 7 \times 10^{5} f_{\mathrm{dust}} \left( \frac{2\times 10^{5}\,[\mathrm{K}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-3}]}{p_{\mathrm{th}}} \right) ^{0.95}\cdot \end{eqnarray}(9)We note that the H2 formation timescale in Eq. (9)is computed neglecting H2 destruction in Eq. (7). Bergin et al. (2004) give full solutions to Eq. (7)with longer timescales by up to a factor of two. In our case fdust = 1 since the emissivity per H atom from IVC 2 is comparable to the mean value in the low velocity gas.

For a distance D ≃ 0.4 kpc the ram pressure in both IVC 1 and IVC 2 is pram ≥ 2 × 104 K cm-3, resulting in a formation timescale of tH2 ≲ 6 Myr. In this time the clouds travel 0.25 kpc. Bergin et al. (2004) state that the actual formation timescale of H2 is not the limiting factor in molecular cloud formation; it is merely a requirement of shielding of H2 and CO which is governed by the accumulation of gas and dust and the formation of dense cores. Hence, tH2 could be even smaller.

For the CNM, Kalberla & Kerp (2009) estimate a cooling time of tcool(CNM) ≃ 0.1 Myr. This is significantly less than tH2, explaining why ISM clouds contain CNM without H2. Above a sufficient particle density, compressed gas can cool faster and become denser.

To estimate the time an IVC has to form H2, we need to compare the formation time with the free-fall time in the galactic gravitational potential calculated by applying a simple linear, unaccelerated motion. Assuming an initial velocity of v = 80 km s-1, the free-fall time from an altitude of 0.5 kpc in the halo is about 6 Myr. Thus, the H2 formation timescale is comparable or shorter than the descending time; H2 may form before the IVC merge with gas in the galactic plane.

It is not surprising that IVC 1 and IVC 2 are not different with respect to their estimated H2 formation timescale, since tH2 is inferred from the EBHIS data only, in which both clouds are very similar (Sect. 5). Hence, the observed differences in the FIR are a result of processes on angular scales which are unresolved with EBHIS.

6.4. Molecular gas in the field

For the molecular IVC we sketch a scenario of H2 formation by the compression due to ram pressure reducing the H2 formation timescale. However, two major questions remain: will IVC 1 become molecular in future? and how is the H2 at vLSR = 0 km s-1 formed?

At present we consider the atomic IVC 1 to be in an intermediate state of molecular formation. Either it is already forming H2 efficiently in small condensations within the cloud, or it will in the future.

In the positionvelocity (PV) diagrams of IVC 1 and IVC 2 (Fig. 13) both clouds are clearly connected to lower velocity gas. Furthermore, the observed velocity gradients along the IVC filaments may indicate a dynamical connection of IVC to lower velocity gas. It is tempting to speculate that some H2 in the local gas represents the remnants of a past interaction between IVC gas and the galactic disk. As IVC gas slows down, the ram pressure and the H2 formation rate decrease. Once a sufficiently high amount of H2 has been formed, self-shielding becomes important and maintains the large H2 content.

The outlined dynamically–triggered formation of H2 is not necessarily traceable by CO emission and might be considered as CO-dark gas (Wolfire et al. 2010; Planck Collaboration XIX 2011). In particular, a sufficiently high dust column density has to be built up in order to allow the formation of CO. Related to this is the XCO factor which is known to be influenced by local conditions especially by metallicity (Feldmann et al. 2012). Furthermore, CO has to be collisionally excited to become observable in emission. Bergin et al. (2004) point out that there could be a large reservoir of H2 in the diffuse ISM which is not able to form CO detectable in emission.

7. Conclusion

We correlate i emission to the brightness at various wavelengths in the FIR dust continuum using new data from the Effelsberg-Bonn i Survey (EBHIS) and the Planck satellite complemented by IRIS data. We study in detail two IVCs that show many similarities in their i properties, such as narrow spectral lines with FWHM ≃ 5 km s-1 and i column densities of Ni = 3 − 4 × 1020 cm-2. Despite their similarity in i, their FIR emission exhibits large differences: one cloud is FIR bright while the other IVC is FIR faint.

From the quantitative correlation of i and FIR emission, we calculate maps of molecular hydrogen column density revealing large amounts of H2 in the field of interest for which no existing CO surveys of the region has detected a CO counterpart. How much of this H2 is actually CO-dark gas we cannot tell since the CO survey data that is available today is not sensitive enough. We do, however, know that the molecular IVC contains CO. The i emission traces only a part of the total gas distribution. Together with the inferred H2 column densities, the relation between gas and dust is consistent.

Based on our findings we describe a scenario of a dynamical transition from atomic to molecular IVCs in the lower galactic halo. During the descent of the IVCs through the galactic halo, they are compressed as a result of external pressure and ram pressure. Once the ram pressure exceeds the thermal pressure, shocks are created which enhance the pressure locally and accumulate gas and dust. An increased pressure reduces the formation timescale of H2 in condensations of the cold atomic medium.

The only physical distinctions between the two IVCs are the amount of dust within the clouds, measured by the dust surface mass density, and the amount of H2. The molecular IVC has a factor of 2–3 more dust within its central region than the atomic IVC, which is accompanied by a 50% higher total hydrogen column density. On the other hand, IVC 1 has more i mass in total. Apparently, this mass is not distributed so as to allow efficient H2 formation. According to the data presented in this paper, we expect that the atomic IVC will also turn molecular in a few Myrs.

Processes on spatial scales that are not resolved by our data govern the evolution of an IVC from an atomic to a molecular cloud. The 10.8  ′ resolution of EBHIS corresponds to a spatial resolution of 1 pc at a distance of 0.4 kpc. However, the accumulation and condensation of smaller and denser clumps regulate the H2 formation on sub-parsec scales. Radio-interferometric observations should reveal a different distribution of i in the two IVCs on sub-parsec scales, for example compact cores in the molecular IVC.

Our approach appears to open a way to search for dark H2 gas across the entire sky. Globally, this new search may reveal other clouds in transition from the atomic to the molecular gas phase. Compared to the low angular resolution of former large-scale i single-dish surveys, the few detections of molecular IVCs so far may be due to the small-angular extent of the molecular cores.

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous referee for his useful comments and suggestions which helped to improve the manuscript considerably. The authors thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) for financial support under the research grant KE757/11-1. F.B. acknowledges support from the MISTIC ERC grant no. 267934. The work is based on observations with the 100m telescope of the MPIfR (Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie) at Effelsberg and the Planck satellite operated by the European Space Agency. The development of Planck has been supported by: ESA; CNES and CNRS/INSU-IN2P3-INP (France); ASI, CNR, and INAF (Italy); NASA and DoE (USA); STFC and UKSA (UK); CSIC, MICINN and JA (Spain); Tekes, AoF and CSC (Finland); DLR and MPG (Germany); CSA (Canada); DTU Space (Denmark); SER/SSO (Switzerland); RCN (Norway); SFI (Ireland); FCT/MCTES (Portugal); and PRACE (EU). T.R. is a member of the International Max Planck Research School (IMPRS) for Astronomy and Astrophysics at the Universities of Bonn and Cologne as well as of the Bonn-Cologne Graduate School of Physics and Astronomy (BCGS).

References

  1. Benjamin, R. A., Venn, K. A., Hiltgen, D. D., & Sneden, C. 1996, ApJ, 464, 836 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergin, E. A., Hartmann, L. W., Raymond, J. C., & Ballesteros-Paredes, J. 2004, ApJ, 612, 921 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beucher, S., & Lantuéjoul, C. 1979, Proc. Int. Workshop Image Processing, Real-Time Edge and Motion Detection/Estimation, Rennes, France [Google Scholar]
  4. Boulanger, F., & Perault, M. 1988, ApJ, 330, 964 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boulanger, F., Abergel, A., Bernard, J.-P., et al. 1996, A&A, 312, 256 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bregman, J. N. 2004, in High Velocity Clouds, eds. H. van Woerden, B. P. Wakker, U. J. Schwarz, & K. S. de Boer, Astrophys. Space Sci. Lib., 312, 341 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dame, T. M., Hartmann, D., & Thaddeus, P. 2001, ApJ, 547, 792 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Désert, F. X., Bazell, D., & Boulanger, F. 1988, ApJ, 334, 815 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Désert, F.-X., Bazell, D., & Blitz, L. 1990, ApJ, 355, L51 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Draine, B. T., & Bertoldi, F. 1996, ApJ, 468, 269 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  11. Feldmann, R., Gnedin, N. Y., & Kravtsov, A. V. 2012, ApJ, 747, 124 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gillmon, K., & Shull, J. M. 2006, ApJ, 636, 908 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gillmon, K., Shull, J. M., Tumlinson, J., & Danforth, C. 2006, ApJ, 636, 891 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Glover, S. C. O., & Clark, P. C. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 377 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Guillard, P., Boulanger, F., Pineau Des Forêts, G., & Appleton, P. N. 2009, A&A, 502, 515 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hartmann, D., Magnani, L., & Thaddeus, P. 1998, ApJ, 492, 205 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hartmann, L., Ballesteros-Paredes, J., & Bergin, E. A. 2001, ApJ, 562, 852 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Heitsch, F., & Putman, M. E. 2009, ApJ, 698, 1485 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hildebrand, R. H. 1983, QJRAS, 24, 267 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jones, A. P., & Nuth, J. A. 2011, A&A, 530, A44 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kalberla, P. M. W., & Dedes, L. 2008, A&A, 487, 951 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kalberla, P. M. W., & Kerp, J. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 27 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kerp, J. 2003, Astron. Nachr., 324, 69 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kerp, J., Winkel, B., Ben Bekhti, N., Flöer, L., & Kalberla, P. M. W. 2011, Astron. Nachr., 332, 637 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lagache, G., Abergel, A., Boulanger, F., & Puget, J.-L. 1998, A&A, 333, 709 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee, H.-H., Herbst, E., Pineau des Forets, G., Roueff, E., & Le Bourlot, J. 1996, A&A, 311, 690 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  27. Low, F. J., Young, E., Beintema, D. A., et al. 1984, ApJ, 278, L19 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Magnani, L., & Smith, A. J. 2010, ApJ, 722, 1685 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Magnani, L., Blitz, L., & Mundy, L. 1985, ApJ, 295, 402 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. McKee, C. F., & Hollenbach, D. J. 1980, ARA&A, 18, 219 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Miville-Deschênes, M.-A., & Lagache, G. 2005, ApJS, 157, 302 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Neugebauer, G., Habing, H. J., van Duinen, R., et al. 1984, ApJ, 278, L1 [Google Scholar]
  33. Odenwald, S. F., & Rickard, L. J. 1987, ApJ, 318, 702 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Peek, J. E. G., Heiles, C., Putman, M. E., & Douglas, K. 2009, ApJ, 692, 827 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pineda, J. L., Goldsmith, P. F., Chapman, N., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 686 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Planck Collaboration XIX. 2011, A&A, 536, A19 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  37. Planck Collaboration XXIV. 2011, A&A, 536, A24 [Google Scholar]
  38. Planck Collaboration I. 2014, A&A, in press [arXiv:1303.5062] [Google Scholar]
  39. Planck Collaboration IX. 2014, A&A, in press DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321531 [Google Scholar]
  40. Planck Collaboration XIII. 2014, A&A, in press DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321553 [Google Scholar]
  41. Planck Collaboration XIV. 2014, A&A, in press DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321562 [Google Scholar]
  42. Planck Collaboration XXX. 2014, A&A, in press DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322093 [Google Scholar]
  43. Predehl, P., & Schmitt, J. H. M. M. 1995, A&A, 293, 889 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  44. Puspitarini, L., & Lallement, R. 2012, A&A, 545, A21 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  45. Putman, M. E., Peek, J. E. G., & Joung, M. R. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 491 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Reach, W. T., Koo, B.-C., & Heiles, C. 1994, ApJ, 429, 672 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Reach, W. T., Wall, W. F., & Odegard, N. 1998, ApJ, 507, 507 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Richter, P., Sembach, K. R., Wakker, B. P., et al. 2001, ApJ, 559, 318 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Richter, P., Wakker, B. P., Savage, B. D., & Sembach, K. R. 2003, ApJ, 586, 230 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Savage, B. D., & Sembach, K. R. 1996, ApJ, 470, 893 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Savage, B. D., Bohlin, R. C., Drake, J. F., & Budich, W. 1977, ApJ, 216, 291 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Snowden, S. L., Freyberg, M. J., Kuntz, K. D., & Sanders, W. T. 2000, ApJS, 128, 171 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Stanko, S., Klein, B., & Kerp, J. 2005, A&A, 436, 391 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  54. Strasser, S., & Taylor, A. R. 2004, ApJ, 603, 560 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wakker, B. P. 2001, ApJS, 136, 463 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wakker, B. P. 2004, in High Velocity Clouds, eds. H. van Woerden, B. P. Wakker, U. J. Schwarz, & K. S. de Boer, Astrophys. Space Sci. Lib., 312, 25 [Google Scholar]
  57. Wakker, B. P. 2006, ApJS, 163, 282 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Weiß, A., Heithausen, A., Herbstmeier, U., & Mebold, U. 1999, A&A, 344, 955 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wesselius, P. R., & Fejes, I. 1973, A&A, 24, 15 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  60. Winkel, B., Kalberla, P. M. W., Kerp, J., & Flöer, L. 2010, ApJS, 188, 488 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Wolfire, M. G., Hollenbach, D., & McKee, C. F. 2010, ApJ, 716, 1191 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

All Tables

Table 1

Properties of the i and FIR data.

Table 2

Dust emissivities across the entire field, IVC 1 and IVC 2.

Table 3

Properties of the cores of IVC 1 and IVC 2 for a distance of D = 0.4 kpc.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Left: column density map of EBHIS integrated between −100 km s-1 ≤ vLSR ≤ + 100 km s-1. Right: corresponding unsmoothed Planck map at 857 GHz. In both figures the black contours mark Ni at the levels of the colour bar tick labels of the column density map.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Left: correlation plot Ni vs. 857 GHz for the entire field. The black solid line is our best fit of Eq. (1)to the data below Ni = 2 × 1020 cm-2. Right: residual map at 857 GHz. The residuals are derived by subtracting for each pixel the FIR sky brightness calculated from Eq. (1)using the linear-fit parameters. The black contours denote Ni as in Fig. 1. The black rectangles mark the locations of two i clouds (IVC 1 on the left, IVC 2 on the right) which are presented in more detail in Sect. 5.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

Maps of dust temperature TD (left) and dust optical depth τ857 (right) at the resolution of the 353 GHz data. Black contours mark Ni as in Fig. 1.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

Dependence of dust optical depth τ857 (left), i column density Ni (middle), and H2 column density NH2 (right) on dust temperature TD. The TD − τ857 plot is done for FIR data at the resolution of the 353 GHz data while the other two plots are for FIR data smoothed to the EBHIS resolution. The black contours show the number density distribution of all data points. The blue contour traces the pixels that contain more i between −20 km s-1 ≤ vLSR ≤ +20 km s-1 than in the IVC range −60 km s-1 ≤ vLSR ≤ −20 km s-1, whereas the red contour traces pixels that have more i in the IVC regime. In Sect. 4.3 we describe how we derive an H2 map from the FIR excess emission. Negative NH2 are a result of the derivation.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5

Map of molecular hydrogen column density NH2 with a 1-σ uncertainty of 0.2 × 1020 cm-2. Negative values result from the derivation and are not physically meaningful. Black contours mark Ni as in Fig. 1.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6

Comparison between the estimated total hydrogen column densities NH using Eq. (4)and the fitted dust optical depth τ857 from modified black-body fits (Eq. (2)). For NH ≥ 5 × 1020 cm-2 a linear relation is fitted and shown by the black line.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7

i-FIR correlations for IVC 1 and IVC 2 at 857 GHz (left) and 3000 GHz (right). The i is integrated between −100 km s-1 ≤ vLSR ≤ + 100 km s-1. The black solid line is the linear fit applying Eq. (1)for IVC 1 and the dashed black line for IVC 2. For IVC 2 the fit is restricted to Ni ≤ 2.0 × 1020 cm-2, above which a FIR excess due to H2 is evident. For IVC 2 the spread in Ni for given Iν is due to a second FIR maximum that is not associated with an i peak (Fig. 12).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 8

i spectra of IVC 1 (top) and IVC 2 (bottom) at their maximum brightness temperature. Both spectra are fitted by two Gaussians plus a constant offset.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 9

Column density map of IVC 1 integrated between −60 km s-1 ≤ vLSR ≤ −20 km s-1. The black contours mark Ni at the levels of the colour bar tick labels. The white contour encloses the core of the IVC which is analysed in further detail in Sect. 5.4. The white circle at the bottom left gives the angular resolution of EBHIS.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 10

FIR dust spectra and fitted modified black bodies with β = 1.8. The spectra are taken at the position of the largest Ni for IVC 1 (top) and IVC 2 (bottom). The fitted dust parameters are (τ857, TD)IVC 1 = ((8.3 ± 0.4) × 10-6, 21.2 ± 0.2 K) and (τ857, TD)IVC 2 = ((3.2 ± 0.1) × 10-5, 19.1 ± 0.2 K).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 11

Column density map of IVC 2 integrated between −60 km s-1 ≤ vLSR ≤ −20 km s-1. The black contours mark Ni at the levels of the colour bar tick labels. The white contour encloses the core of the IVC which is analysed in further detail in Sect. 5.4. The white circle at the bottom left gives the angular resolution of EBHIS.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 12

Column density map of IVC 2 overlayed with the unsmoothed 857 GHz data as black contours. A second FIR peak is located east of the i core, but it is not evident in i, implying that this structure is unresolved with our i data. The pointing centres of the Désert et al. (1990) CO observations are given by the two black diamonds. Their corresponding beams are smaller than one pixel. The white circles indicate the angular resolution of EBHIS (larger) and Planck (smaller).

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 13

Position–velocity (PV) diagrams of IVC 1 (left) integrated between 11h57m ≥ RA ≥ 11h45m and IVC 2 (right) integrated between 10h54m ≥ RA ≥ 10h48m. The white lines indicate the orientation of the IVCs in PV space showing a velocity gradient which is interpreted as evidence for interactions of the clouds with the surrounding medium.

In the text
thumbnail Fig. 14

Comparison of modelled halo pressure from Kalberla & Dedes (2008) to ram pressure at the given distance in the line of sight towards IVC 2. The ram pressure is calculated from Eq. (8)using the modelled halo density and the chosen cloud velocities 40, 60, 80, and 100 km s-1.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.