EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 697 (May 2025) A&A, 697 (2025) A2 References
Euclid on Sky
Open Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 697, May 2025
Euclid on Sky
Article Number A2
Number of page(s) 33
Section Astronomical instrumentation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450996
Published online 30 April 2025
  1. Albrecht, A., Bernstein, G., Cahn, R., et al. 2006, arXiv e-prints [arXiv:astro-ph/0609591] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amara, A., & Réfrégier, A. 2008, MNRAS, 391, 228 [Google Scholar]
  3. Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Avgoustidis, A., et al. 2018, Liv. Rev. Relativ., 21, 2 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anselmi, A., & Mottini, S. 2018, STOP Analysis Report, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUC-TAST-RP-1-062 version 3 [Google Scholar]
  5. Aussel, H., et. al. 2018, Euclid Mission Performance Document, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-IAP-EUC-DP-00244 version 2.0 [Google Scholar]
  6. Awan, S. 2016, VIS Top Level Requirements Document, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-MSS-RD-6-001 version 4.0 [Google Scholar]
  7. Awan, S. 2019, VIS Instrument Operation Concept Document, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-MSS-PL-6-026 version 4.3 [Google Scholar]
  8. Awan, S. 2022, VIS Flight User Manual, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-MSS-MA-6-013 version 1.4 [Google Scholar]
  9. Awan, S., Candini, G. P., & Azzollini, R. 2022, VIS Verification Matrix, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-MSS-OTH-6-004 version 5.1 [Google Scholar]
  10. Azzollini, R. 2019, VIS FPA TVAC Testing, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-MSS-TR-6-121 version 1.0 [Google Scholar]
  11. Azzollini, R. 2021, VIS Ground Calibration Campaign, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-MSS-RP-6-129 version 1.2 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bisigello, L., Kuchner, U., Conselice, C. J., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 2337 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Boenke, T. 2021, Euclid– Reference Observation Sequence (ROS), Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-EST-TN-1-019 issue 1.0 [Google Scholar]
  14. Boone, K., Aldering, G., Copin, Y., et al. 2018, PASP, 130, 064504 [Google Scholar]
  15. Candini, G.P. 2017a, VIS EM EMC Test Report – ESTEC, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-MSS-TR-6-021 version 1.0 [Google Scholar]
  16. Candini, G. P. 2017b, VIS EM EMC Test Report – Portsmouth, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-MSS-TR-6-020 version 1.1 [Google Scholar]
  17. Candini, G. P. 2019, Detector Chain QM EMC Test Report, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-MSS-TR-6-053 version 1.0 [Google Scholar]
  18. Candini, G. P. 2020, Study of bit-level non-linearity estimation algorithm, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-MSS-TN-6-052 version 1.0 [Google Scholar]
  19. Candini, G.-P., & Awan, S. 2021a, Ambient Full Functional Test Report (FM100), Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-MSS-TR-6-124 version 1.0 [Google Scholar]
  20. Candini, G.-P., & Awan, S. 2021b, Ambient Limited Functional Test Report, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-MSS-TR-6-125 version 1.0 [Google Scholar]
  21. Cara, C., et. al. 2016, VIS PMCU Design & Justification Report, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-SAP-RP-6-003 version 2.2 [Google Scholar]
  22. Clarke, A., Hall, D., Murray, N., Holland, A., & Burt, D. 2012, SPIE Conf. Ser., 8453, 84531I [Google Scholar]
  23. Cropper, M., Hoekstra, H., Kitching, T., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 3103 [Google Scholar]
  24. Cropper, M., Pottinger, S., Azzollini, R., et al. 2018, SPIE Conf. Ser., 10698, 1069828 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  25. Cropper, M., Nakajima, R., & Liebing, P. 2021, VIS Instrument PLM-TV Performance Report, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-MSS-TR-6-134 version 1.0 [Google Scholar]
  26. Di Giorgio, A. M., Leutenegger, P. H., Bonati, A., et al. 2010, SPIE Conf. Ser., 7731, 77312W [Google Scholar]
  27. Di Giorgio, A. M., & the OHB-I Technical Team. 2019, VIS CDPU Boot Software Design Document, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-IFS- ADD-6-001 version 2.0 [Google Scholar]
  28. Di Giorgio, A. M., Bastia, P., Liu, S. J., et al. 2012, SPIE Conf. Ser., 8442, 844233 [Google Scholar]
  29. Endicott, J., Darby, S., Bowring, S., et al. 2012, SPIE Conf. Ser., 8453, 845304 [Google Scholar]
  30. Euclid Collaboration 2013a, Euclid Mission Requirement Document, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-EST-RD-1-001 version 1.0 [Google Scholar]
  31. Euclid Collaboration 2013b, Euclid VIS CCD Requirement Specifications, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-EST-RS-6-002 version 2.0 [Google Scholar]
  32. Euclid Collaboration (Schirmer et al. 2014), Calibration Concept Document Part B (CalCD-B), Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-MPIA-RD-1-001 issue 3.1 [Google Scholar]
  33. Euclid Collaboration 2015, Euclid Science Requirements Document (SciRD), DEM-SA-Dc-00001, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-EST-RQ-8-001 version 7.1 [Google Scholar]
  34. Euclid Collaboration 2016, Euclid Experiment Interface Document Part A (EIDA), Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-EST-EID-3-001 version 2.3 [Google Scholar]
  35. Euclid Collaboration 2018a, Mission Operation Concept Document Part A (MOCD-A), Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-EST-RD-1-010 issue 3.1 [Google Scholar]
  36. Euclid Collaboration 2018b, Euclid Payload Elements Requirements Document (PERD), Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-EST-RD-3-002 version 2.2 [Google Scholar]
  37. Euclid Collaboration (Barnett, R., et al.) 2019, A&A, 631, A85 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  38. Euclid Collaboration (Paykari, P., et al.) 2020, A&A, 635, A139 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  39. Euclid Collaboration (Borlaff, A. S., et al.) 2022, A&A, 657, A92 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  40. Euclid Collaboration (Scaramella, R., et al.) 2022, A&A, 662, A112 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  41. Euclid Collaboration (Bretonnière, H., et al.) 2023, A&A, 671, A102 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  42. Euclid Collaboration (Jahnke, K., et al.) 2025, A&A, 697, A3 (Euclid on Sky SI) [Google Scholar]
  43. Euclid Collaboration (Mellier, Y., et al.) 2025, A&A, 697, A1 (Euclid on Sky SI) [Google Scholar]
  44. Frieman, J. A., Turner, M. S., & Huterer, D. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 385 [Google Scholar]
  45. Gaia Collaboration (Prusti, T., et al.) 2016, A&A, 595, A1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  46. Galli, E., Di Giorgio, A. M., Pezzuto, S., et al. 2014, SPIE Conf. Ser., 9152, 91520Y [Google Scholar]
  47. Galli, E., Di Giorgio, A. M., & Giusi, G. 2020, VIS CDPU OBS SW Design Document, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-IFS-RP-6-007 version 2.3 [Google Scholar]
  48. Gaspar Venancio, L. M., Laureijs, R., Lorenzo, J., et al. 2014, SPIE Conf. Ser., 9143, 91430I [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  49. Gaspar Venancio, L., Laureijs, R., Racca, G., et al. 2023, SPIE Conf. Ser., 12777, 127776H [Google Scholar]
  50. Genolet, L., Bozzo, E., Paltani, S., et al. 2016, SPIE Conf. Ser., 9904, 99040U [Google Scholar]
  51. Giusi, G., Liu, S. J., Li Causi, G., et al. 2014, SPIE Conf. Ser., 9143, 91432Z [Google Scholar]
  52. Gow, J. P. D., Murray, N. J., Hall, D. J., et al. 2012, SPIE Conf. Ser., 8453, 845316 [Google Scholar]
  53. Gow, J. P. D., Murray, N. J., Wood, D., et al. 2016, SPIE Conf. Ser., 9915, 99150L [Google Scholar]
  54. Hailey, M. 2016, VIS ROE Design Report, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-MSS-RP-6-007 version 1.8, 2016 May 11 [Google Scholar]
  55. Hoekstra, H. 2017, Impact of cross-talk in VIS on weak lensing shape measurements, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-STRW-TN-8-004 version 1.0 [Google Scholar]
  56. Hoekstra, H., Viola, M., & Herbonnet, R. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 3295 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Hoekstra, H., Kannawadi, A., & Kitching, T. D. 2021, A&A, 646, A124 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  58. Hu, H. 2016, VIS RPSU Design Report, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL- MSS-RP-6-013 version 1.5 [Google Scholar]
  59. Inserra, C., Nichol, R. C., Scovacricchi, D., et al. 2018, A&A, 609, A83 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  60. Israel, H., Massey, R., Prod’homme, T., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 561 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Janesick, J. R. 2001, Scientific Charge-coupled Devices (Bellingham, WA: SPIE Optical Engineering Press) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Kitching, T. D., Paykari, P., Hoekstra, H., & Cropper, M. 2019, Open J. Astrophys., 2, 5 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. Kitching, T., Deshpande, A., & Taylor, P. 2021, Open J. Astrophys., 4, 17 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. Larchevêque, C., Genolet, L., Bozzo, E., et al. 2018, arXiv e-prints [arXiv:1801.07496] [Google Scholar]
  65. Laureijs, R., Amiaux, J., Arduini, S., et al. 2011, arXiv e-prints [arXiv:1110.3193] [Google Scholar]
  66. Liebing, P. 2021, PLM E2E Test Data Analysis, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-MSS-TR-6-135 version 1.0, 2021 December 09 [Google Scholar]
  67. Martignac, J., Carty, M., Tourette, T., et al. 2014, SPIE Conf. Ser., 9143, 91432Y [Google Scholar]
  68. Massey, R., Hoekstra, H., Kitching, T., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 661 [Google Scholar]
  69. Mellier, Y. 1999, ARA&A, 37, 127 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  70. Mellier, Y. 2016, in 41st COSPAR Scientific Assembly, 41, H0.1-11-16 [Google Scholar]
  71. Moriya, T. J., Inserra, C., Tanaka, M., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A157 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  72. Niemi, S.-M., Cropper, M., Szafraniec, M., & Kitching, T. 2015, Exp. Astron., 39, 207 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. Okura, Y., Plazas, A. A., May, M., & Tamagawa, T. 2015, J. Instrum., 10, C08010 [Google Scholar]
  74. Park, H., Nomerotski, A., & Tsybychev, D. 2017, J. Instrum., 12, C05015 [Google Scholar]
  75. Peacock, J. A., Schneider, P., Efstathiou, G., et al. 2006, arXiv e-prints [arXiv:astro-ph/0610906] [Google Scholar]
  76. Philippon, A. 2016, VIS CU Design Report, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-IAS-RP-6-001 version 3.0 [Google Scholar]
  77. Plazas, A. A., Bernstein, G. M., & Sheldon, E. S. 2014, PASP, 126, 750 [Google Scholar]
  78. Pöntinen, M., Granvik, M., Nucita, A. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 679, A135 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  79. Prod’homme, T., Verhoeve, P., Kohley, R., Short, A., & Boudin, N. 2014, SPIE Conf. Ser., 9154, 915409 [Google Scholar]
  80. Racca, G. D., Laureijs, R., Stagnaro, L., et al. 2016, SPIE Conf. Ser., 9904, 99040O [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  81. Réfrégier, A. 2010, in 38th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, 38, 2 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  82. Réfrégier, A., Boulade, O., Mellier, Y., et al. 2006, SPIE Conf. Ser., 6265, 62651Y [Google Scholar]
  83. Réfrégier, A., Douspis, M., & DUNE Collaboration. 2008, SPIE Conf. Ser., 7010, 701018 [Google Scholar]
  84. Réfrégier, A., Amara, A., Kitching, T. D., et al. 2010, arXiv e-prints [arXiv:1001.0061] [Google Scholar]
  85. Renaud, D., Cara, C., Berthé, M., et al. 2018, SPIE Conf. Ser., 10705, 107051F [Google Scholar]
  86. Sciortino, A., Latini, V., Malusardi, P., Legramandi, S., & the OHB-I Technical Team. 2019, VIS CDPU Hardware Design Definition Report, EUC-TN-ATI-001 version 8 [Google Scholar]
  87. Short, A. D., Barry, D., Berthe, M., et al. 2014, SPIE Conf. Ser., 9154, 91540R [Google Scholar]
  88. Signor, T., Rodighiero, G., Bisigello, L., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A127 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  89. Skottfelt, J. 2021, VIS Ground Calibration Campaign Trap Pumping analysis, Open_Euclid_TN_36.10 version 1.0 [Google Scholar]
  90. Skottfelt, J., & Hall, D. 2015, Comparing data and methods from CCD204 and CCD273 tests implemented at OU and ESTEC, Euclid Collaboration Document, Open-Euclid-TN-029.2 [Google Scholar]
  91. Skottfelt, J., Hall, D., Gow, J., et al. 2016, SPIE Conf. Ser., 9915, 991529 [Google Scholar]
  92. Skottfelt, J., Wander, M., Cropper, M., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints [arXiv:2407.01268] [Google Scholar]
  93. Szafraniec, M. 2019, FM CCD Focal Plane Assignment Matrix, Euclid Collaboration Document, EUCL-MSS-TN-6-044 version 2.0 [Google Scholar]
  94. Szafraniec, M., Azzollini, R., Cropper, M., et al. 2016, SPIE Conf. Ser., 9915, 991510 [Google Scholar]
  95. Taylor, A. N., Kitching, T. D., Bacon, D. J., & Heavens, A. F. 2007, MNRAS, 374, 1377 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.