Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 509, January 2010
Article Number A9
Number of page(s) 17
Section Astronomical instrumentation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912973
Published online 12 January 2010
  1. Absil, O. 2001, Master's thesis, Liège University, Liège, Belgium, http://www.aeos.ulg.ac.be/ [Google Scholar]
  2. Absil, O. 2006, Ph.D. Thesis, Liège University, Liège, Belgium [Google Scholar]
  3. Absil, O., di Folco, E., Mérand, A., et al. 2006, A&A, 452, 237 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  4. Absil, O., Defrère, D., Coudé du Foresto, V., et al. 2008a, in Proc. SPIE, 7013 [Google Scholar]
  5. Absil, O., di Folco, E., Mérand, A., et al. 2008b, A&A, 487, 1041 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. Absil, O., Mennesson, B., Le Bouquin, J.-B., et al. 2009, ApJ, 704, 150 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Akeson, R. L., Ciardi, D. R., Millan-Gabet, R., et al. 2009, ApJ, 691, 1896 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Alonso, R., Auvergne, M., Baglin, A., et al. 2008, A&A, 482 [Google Scholar]
  9. Angel, J. R. P., & Woolf, N. J. 1997, ApJ, 475, 373 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Barge, P., Baglin, A., Auvergne, M., et al. 2008, A&A, 482 [Google Scholar]
  11. Beichman, C. A., Bryden, G., Stapelfeldt, K. R., et al. 2006, ApJ, 652, 1674 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Lissauer, J., et al. 2007, in Transiting Extrapolar Planets Workshop, ed. C. Afonso, D. Weldrake, & T. Henning, ASP Conf. Ser., 366, 309 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bracewell, R. N. 1978, Nature, 274, 780 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Carle, E. 2005, EMMA configuration: evaluation of optical performances, Tech. Rep. Issue 1, ESA (SCI-A/279) [Google Scholar]
  15. Chazelas, B., Brachet, F., Bordé, P., et al. 2006, Appl. Opt., 45, 984 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. D'Arcio, L. 2005, Darwin Variability noise sensitivity analysis, Tech. Rep. Issue 1, ESA (SCI-A/048) [Google Scholar]
  17. Defrère, D., Absil, O., Coudé Du Foresto, V., Danchi, W. C., & den Hartog, R. 2008a, A&A, 490, 435 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  18. Defrère, D., Lay, O., den Hartog, R., et al. 2008b, in Proc. SPIE, 7013 [Google Scholar]
  19. den Hartog, R. 2005a, DARWIN science performance prediction, Tech. Rep. Issue 1, ESA (SCI-A/300) [Google Scholar]
  20. den Hartog, R. 2005b, The DARWINsim science simulator, Tech. Rep. Issue 1, ESA (SCI-A/297) [Google Scholar]
  21. Dermott, S. F., Nicholson, P. D., Burns, J. A., et al. 1985, in Properties and Interactions of Interplanetary Dust, ed. R. H. Giese, & P. Lamy, Ap&SS Library, 119, IAU Colloq. 85, 395 [Google Scholar]
  22. Dermott, S. F., Jayaraman, S., Xu, Y. L., Gustafson, B. A. S., & Liou, J. C. 1994, in , 719 [Google Scholar]
  23. Di Folco, E., Absil, O., Augereau, J.-C., et al. 2007, A&A, 475, 243 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dohnanyi, J. S. 1969, J. Geophys. Res., 74, 2531 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fridlund, M. 2005, Darwin Science Requirements Document, Tech. Rep. Issue 5, ESA (SCI-A) [Google Scholar]
  26. Fridlund, C. V. M., d'Arcio, L., den Hartog, R., et al. 2006, in Proc. SPIE, 6268 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gabor, P., Chazelas, B., Brachet, F., et al. 2008, A&A, 483 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gillon, M., Pont, F., Demory, B.-O., et al. 2007, A&A, 472, L13 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  29. Greaves, J. S., Holland, W. S., Wyatt, M. C., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, L187 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hinkley, S., Oppenheimer, B. R., Soummer, R., et al. 2007, ApJ, 654, 633 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hinz, P. M., Bippert-Plymate, T., Breuninger, A., et al. 2008, in Proc. SPIE, 7013 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., & Clampin, M. 2005, Nature, 435, 1067 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kaltenegger, L., Eiroa, C., & Fridlund, C. V. M. 2008, A&SS, accepted [arXiv:0810.5138] [Google Scholar]
  34. Karlsson, A. L., Wallner, O., Perdigues Armengol, J. M., et al. 2004, in Proc. SPIE, ed. W. A. Traub, 5491, 831 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kelsall, T., Weiland, J. L., Franz, B. A., et al. 1998, ApJ, 508, 44 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ksendzov, A., Lay, O., Martin, S., et al. 2007, Appl. Opt., 46, 7957 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kuchner, M. J., & Holman, M. J. 2003, ApJ, 588, 1110 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Landgraf, M., & Jehn, R. 2001, Ap&SS, 278, 357 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lane, B. F., Muterspaugh, M. W., & Shao, M. 2006, ApJ, 648, 1276 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lawson, P. R., Lay, O. P., Martin, S. R., et al. 2008, in Proc. SPIE, 7013 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lay, O. P. 2004, Appl. Opt., 43, 6100 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lay, O. P. 2005, Appl. Opt., 44, 5859 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lay, O. P. 2006, in Proc. SPIE, 6268 [Google Scholar]
  44. Lay, O. P., Martin, S. R., & L., H. S. 2007, in Proc. SPIE, 6693 [Google Scholar]
  45. Léger, A., & Herbst, T. 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 707 [Google Scholar]
  46. Léger, A., Rouan, D., Schneider, J., et al. 2009, A&A, 506, 287 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  47. Liou, J.-C., & Zook, H. A. 1999, AJ, 118, 580 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Macintosh, B. A., Becklin, E. E., Kaisler, D., Konopacky, Q., & Zuckerman, B. 2003, ApJ, 594, 538 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Mawet, D., Hanot, C., Lenaers, C., et al. 2007, Optics Express, 15, 12850 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Mayor, M., & Queloz, D. 1995, Nature, 378, 355 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Mayor, M., Bonfils, X., Forveille, T., et al. 2009, A&A, 507, 487 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  52. Mennesson, B., & Mariotti, J. M. 1997, Icarus, 128, 202 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Moro-Martín, A., & Malhotra, R. 2005, ApJ, 633, 1150 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Moutou, C., Pont, F., Barge, P., et al. 2005, A&A, 437, 355 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ozernoy, L. M., Gorkavyi, N. N., Mather, J. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 537, L147 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Reach, W. T., Franz, B. A., Weiland, J. L., et al. 1995, Nature, 374, 521 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Reche, R., Beust, H., Augereau, J.-C., et al. 2008, A&A, 480, 551 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  58. Richardson, L. J., Deming, D., Horning, K., Seager, S., & Harrington, J. 2007, Nature, 445, 892 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Robertson, H. P. 1937, MNRAS, 97, 423 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  60. Roques, F., Scholl, H., Sicardy, B., et al. 1994, Icarus, 108, 37 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Ruilier, C., & Cassaing, F. 2001, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A, 18, 143 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Schneider, G., Weinberger, A. J., Becklin, E. E., Debes, J. H., & Smith, B. A. 2009, AJ, 137, 53 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. Serabyn, E. 2009, ApJ, 697, 1334 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. Serabyn, E., & Colavita, M. M. 2001, Appl. Opt., 40, 1668 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Stark, C. C., & Kuchner, M. J. 2008, ApJ, 686, 637 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. Stark, C. C., & Kuchner, M. J. 2009, ApJ, 707, 543 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  67. Stark, C. C., Kuchner, M. J., Traub, W. A., et al. 2009, BAAS 41, 501 [Google Scholar]
  68. Thiebaut, E., & Mugnier, L. 2006, in Direct Imaging of Exoplanets: Science and Techniques, IAU Colloq. 200, 547 [Google Scholar]
  69. Wilner, D. J., Holman, M. J., Kuchner, M. J., et al. 2002, ApJ, 569, L115 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.