Open Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 709, May 2026
Article Number A105
Number of page(s) 10
Section Planets, planetary systems, and small bodies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202659046
Published online 07 May 2026

© The Authors 2026

Licence Creative CommonsOpen Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. to support open access publication.

1 Introduction

Following its successful sample return from the carbonaceous asteroid (162173) Ryugu, the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency’s (JAXA) Hayabusa2 spacecraft transitioned to the ambitious extended mission, Hayabusa2# (SHARP: Small Hazardous Asteroid Reconnaissance Probe). This new phase of its journey will see Hayabusa2 undertake a long cruise, including a close flyby of the near-Earth asteroid (98943) Torifune in 2026, before ultimately reaching its primary target, the near-Earth asteroid 1998 KY26, in 2031 (Hirabayashi et al. 2021).

Asteroid 1998 KY26 is a particularly intriguing object for scientific study due to its tiny size and exceptionally fast rotation. With an estimated diameter of only about 30 meters, the asteroid’s rapid spin period of approximately 10 minutes per rotation, as observed at the time of its discovery (Ostro et al. 1999), makes it truly unique. Recently, several studies have suggested an even faster rotation up to ∼5 min for this object, leading to an even smaller diameter of less than 15 meters (Beniyama et al. 2025; Santana-Ros et al. 2025). This small rapid rotator poses both significant challenges for close-up observations and presents unparalleled opportunities to investigate the physical properties and internal structures of such fast-spinning, small celestial bodies (e.g., Kikuchi et al. 2023).

The study of small (meter – to tens-of-meter-sized) near-Earth asteroids such as 1998 KY26 has gained considerable importance in recent years, particularly within the burgeoning field of planetary defense, which encompasses global efforts to identify, track, and mitigate the potential threat of asteroid impacts on Earth. A good example is the impact, which occurred on February 15, 2013, when a 17–20 m diameter asteroid entered the atmosphere over Chelyabinsk, Russia, and exploded in an air-burst that liberated about 500 kilotons of TNT equivalent (Brown et al. 2013). Other examples are the recent cases of the 30 m E-type asteroid 2023 DZ2 (Popescu et al. 2023; Reddy et al. 2024) – which has a minimum orbit intersection distance (MOID) with Earth of 0.00005 au as well as an unusually high initial probability of near-term impact – and the 60 meter asteroid 2024 YR4 (Rivkin et al. 2025), which reached an impact probability of ∼3% early in 2025. Understanding the characteristics and behaviors of these small asteroids, which are more numerous and often hard to detect, is crucial for developing effective strategies to protect our planet from future collisions.

2 Spectroscopic observations and data reduction

Despite its discovery in 1998, favorable observing windows for 1998 KY26 are infrequent. April and May 2024 provided the first opportunity in more than two decades to obtain spectral observations with a very large telescope. Seizing this chance, we conducted spectroscopic observations of 1998 KY26 using the 10.4-meter Gran Telescopio Canarias (GTC). Located at the El Roque de los Muchachos Observatory on the island of La Palma in the Canary Islands, Spain, GTC is one of the largest and most advanced optical and near-infrared telescope in the world. The spectroscopic data provide valuable insights into the asteroid’s surface composition, potentially revealing its origin and evolutionary history.

The asteroid 1998 KY26 was observed on the night of May 21, 2024. Spectroscopic observations were done using the OSIRIS+ camera-spectrograph (Cepa et al. 2000; Cepa 2010), under the program GTC37-24A (PI: J. de León). OSIRIS+ is equipped with a blue-sensitive monolithic 4096 × 4096 pixels Charge-Coupled Device (CCD), which provides a 7.8′ × 7.8′ field of view. We used the R300R grism that covers a wavelength range from 0.48 to 0.92 µm with a dispersion of 7.74 Å/pixel for a 0.6″ slit. We combined the R300R grism with a 1.2″ slit, oriented toward the parallactic angle, and with the telescope tracking rate set to match the asteroid’s proper motion. Two consecutive spectra of 900 s each (starting time 04:14 UTC and 04:30 UTC, respectively), at an air mass of 1.36 were obtained. To obtain the asteroid’s reflectance spectrum, we also observed the solar analog star Landolt SA112-1333 (three individual images of 1 s each), using the same instrumental setup and at a similar air mass to that of the asteroid. At the moment of the observations, 1998 KY26 presented an apparent visual magnitude of mV=20.4, a phase angle of 29.7 degrees, and was at a distance of 1.053 au and 0.047 au from the Sun and Earth, respectively.

Data reduction was done using standard procedures. The 2D images were initially bias and flat-field corrected, the sky background was subtracted, and a 1D spectrum was extracted using a variable aperture, set to the pixel where the intensity was 10% of the peak value. Wavelength calibration was performed using Xe+Ne+HgAr lamps. This procedure was applied to the spectra of the asteroid and the solar analog star. To obtain the reflectance spectrum, we divided the asteroid observations by the spectra of the G2V star, and the resulting ratios were then averaged and normalized to unity at 0.55 µm to obtain the final reflectance spectrum of 1998 KY26, shown in Fig. 1.

Thumbnail: Fig. 1 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 1

Visible reflectance spectrum of 1998 KY26 observed with OSIRIS+ at the 10.4 m GTC on May 21, 2024. The averaged spectrum is shown in black, with the associated 1σ error of the average in gray.

Thumbnail: Fig. 2 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 2

Reflectance spectrum of 1998 KY26 (black) compared with the three best-matching taxonomic reference spectra from DeMeo et al. (2009) and Mahlke et al. (2022). The spectrum obtained by Bolin et al. (2025) is also depicted in red.

3 Spectral analysis

To estimate the composition of 1998 KY26, we first carried out a taxonomic classification based on its spectral properties and albedo, then compared its spectral curve with those of meteorites available in the RELAB database (Pieters & Hiroi 2004). Both analyses are described in the subsections below.

3.1 Taxonomic classification

Accurate characterization of asteroid surface composition is required for understanding their formation and evolution. To this end, various asteroid taxonomic classifications have been proposed, each leveraging different spectral features and wavelength ranges. Among these, the Bus-DeMeo taxonomy (DeMeo et al. 2009) is one of the most widely adopted and comprehensive systems. This classification scheme utilizes reflectance spectra spanning a broad wavelength range from 0.45 to 2.45 µm, allowing for the identification of key absorption features related to mineralogical composition.

The Bus-DeMeo taxonomy broadly categorizes asteroids into groups based on the presence or absence of a characteristic absorption feature around 1 µm, which is typically indicative of olivine and pyroxene minerals. Further subdivisions are made based on spectral slope, other absorption bands, and the overall shape of the reflectance spectrum. To classify the reflectance spectrum of 1998 KY26, we employed the M4AST online tool1 (Popescu et al. 2012). This tool performs a χ2 fitting curve-matching procedure (based on various criteria such as χ2 or least-squares differences), comparing the observed asteroid spectrum with a library of mean spectra for each taxonomic class defined by DeMeo et al. (2009). Using M4AST (see Fig. 2), our analysis yields a best fit to the Xe-type.

The Mahlke taxonomy (Mahlke et al. 2022), a more recent classification scheme, incorporates both reflectance spectra (0.45–2.45 µm) and albedo data. When evaluating our spectrum within this framework using the classy tool (Mahlke et al. 2022), we found that in the latent space, the S-type and E-type clusters are distributed in close proximity, making them difficult to distinguish when only limited visible wavelength information is available. Given the limited wavelength coverage of our data, which may not fully capture the diagnostic features required for a robust transformation into the latent space, we prioritized a direct comparison of spectral similarity via χ2 minimization. Based on a χ2 minimization analysis, we identified the M-type as the most probable classification, followed by the X-type. Both the Bus-DeMeo and Mahlke schemes consistently place the object within the X-complex. Notably, while the Xe-type in the Bus-DeMeo system closely aligns with the M- or X-types in the Mahlke taxonomy, the E-type exhibits a significantly redder spectral slope (Fig. 2).

This complex is further subdivided into E-, M-, and P-types, originally defined in the Tholen taxonomy (Tholen 1984). The geometric albedo pV of E-type asteroids is 0.550.11+0.14Mathematical equation: $0.55_{ - 0.11}^{ + 0.14}$, while that of M-type asteroids is 0.140.04+0.05Mathematical equation: $0.14_{ - 0.04}^{ + 0.05}$, and that of P-type asteroids is 0.050.01+0.02Mathematical equation: $0.05_{ - 0.01}^{ + 0.02}$ (Mahlke et al. 2022). Xe-type asteroids in Bus & Binzel (2002a) are spectroscopically distinguished by a relatively broad and a subtle absorption band centered around 0.49 µm. This feature has been tentatively linked to the presence of troilite (FeS) and/or other opaque minerals, though its exact mineralogical interpretation can be complex. However, this feature of Xe-type asteroids is barely seen in the extended taxonomy using visible-to-near-infrared range by DeMeo et al. (2009). We observe a drop-off in reflectance in our spectrum of 1998 KY26 below ∼0.56 µm, which could be attributed to the 0.49 µm band. However, the limited wavelength coverage of our observations and the relatively low signal-to-noise ratio of the spectrum in this wavelength range do not allow us to conclude that this band is present. Despite these challenges, our spectroscopic results are notably consistent with previous observations of 1998 KY26 obtained with the 8.1-meter Gemini North telescope, as reported by Bolin et al. (2025), further corroborating our taxonomic classification (see red points in Fig. 2). This consistency across independent observations strengthens the reliability of our Xe-class assignment.

Recent thermal infrared observations with VLT/VISIR further constrain the physical properties of 1998 KY26. Beniyama et al. (2025) conducted deep mid-infrared imaging over three consecutive nights in May 2024. The asteroid was not detected, yielding a 10.64 µm flux density upper limit of ∼2 mJy. Thermo-physical modeling based on this non-detection implied that the effective diameter of 1998 KY26 had to be smaller than 17 m, significantly below the radar-based estimate of 30 ± 10 m (Ostro et al. 1999). This new size constraint, combined with an updated absolute magnitude of H = 26.13 ± 0.16, requires a geometric albedo of pV ≥ 0.19. Such a high albedo is inconsistent with typical carbonaceous asteroids.

Recent independent constraints on the physical properties of 1998 KY26 strongly reinforce its classification as an E-type asteroid. Based on an extensive light curve campaign, (Santana-Ros et al. 2025) determined an absolute magnitude of H = 26.13 ± 0.16. Combined with their size estimate of 11 ± 2 m, this implies a geometric albedo of pV ∼ 0.52 ± 0.08. Such a high albedo is fully consistent with E-types.

Our GTC reflectance spectrum places 1998 KY26 in the Xe class of the Bus–DeMeo taxonomy, in the M or X class of the Malhke taxonomy, and in the X class of the Tholen taxonomy. This spectral classification, combined with the object’s likely high albedo, points toward an interpretation as an E-type asteroid rather than M-type.

3.2 Comparison with meteorite spectra

To further constrain the composition of asteroid 1998 KY26, we compared its reflectance spectrum with those of meteorites available in the RELAB database (Pieters & Hiroi 2004), using the M4AST tool, which computes the mean squared differences between normalized spectra of an asteroid and a meteorite. Note that due to the limited wavelength interval and the lack of absorption features in the observed spectrum, multiple spectral matches are possible. The best initial matches, which have the smallest mean squared spectral differences, correspond to two carbonaceous chondrites: a particulate (<125 µm) sample of EET96029,14 (C2) and a sample of Murchinson (CM2) heated at 400 C. However, these materials are very dark, with reflectances on the order of 0.03 (3%), and therefore inconsistent with the high albedo reported for this object.

Interestingly, the next best spectral match corresponds to a sample of an enstatite chondrite of type EL6, consistent with the previously reported taxonomic classification. This meteorite sample (#ID: MT-PFV-119-B) originates from the Allan Hills ALH 81021 meteorite, was processed in the laboratory, and consists of dry sieved, fine particulate material (<25 µm). Grossman (1994) noted that the enstatite in this sample is nearly pure MgSiO3.

To further investigate this, we retrieved additional spectra from the RELAB database through the PDS Geoscience Node Spectral Library2, including 40 aubrites (enstatite achondrites), 24 EH chondrites, and 29 EL chondrites, all measured at a 30 phase angle. Our analysis reveals significant disparity in reflectance at 0.55 µm (which can be grossly compared to the albedo) among these groups, despite their shared primary composition of enstatite. Aubrites exhibit a mean reflectance at 0.55 µm of 38 ± 11%, whereas EH and EL chondrites show significantly lower values of 10 ± 3% and 11 ± 4%, respectively. Furthermore, aubrites typically display a flatter spectral slope compared to the steeper profiles of EH and EL chondrites (Fig. 3). The spectrum of 1998 KY26 aligns closely with the spectral shape of EL and EH chondrites.

The average reflectance of the <25µm sample of the ALH 81021 EL6 chondrite (18% at a 30 phase angle) is higher than that for the EL chondrites group. By applying the conversion methodology defined in Eq. (2) of Beck et al. (2021), we derived an equivalent geometric albedo of 21%. This value is notably lower than the previous estimation reported by Santana-Ros et al. (2025); in terms of albedo alone, aubrites provide a closer analog to the asteroid’s estimated properties.

4 Distribution of E-type asteroids

As described in the previous section, E-type asteroids are a subclass of X-types in Tholen’s taxonomy. E-types are a relatively rare class characterized by their high albedo (typically pV > 0.3) and distinctive spectral properties. Spectral similarity to enstatite achondrites (aubrites) was pointed out, for example, by Bell et al. (1989) and Gaffey et al. (1992). Historically, the Hungaria region, in the far inner asteroid belt with high inclination (∼20 deg) has been recognized as the principal reservoir of these bodies (e.g., Gaffey et al. 1992; Clark et al. 2004). However, recent survey data have revealed that the distribution of E-types in the Solar System is more complex. Our investigation now focuses on the spectroscopic properties throughout the Hungaria region and the main belt, aiming to uncover further links to 1998 KY26’s composition and history. This helps us understand its journey from its likely birthplace to its current near-Earth orbit.

For this analysis, we combined photometric data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) small body catalog (Sergeyev & Carry 2021) with the albedo catalog (Mainzer et al. 2019) from the NEOWISE mission (Masiero et al. 2017). The SDSS provides five-band photometry in the u (354 nm), g (477 nm), r (623 nm), i (763 nm), and z (913 nm) filters. Following the data quality criteria described in Tatsumi et al. (2023, 2025), we selected only objects with reliable photometry (photometric errors <0.1 mag in all bands, and no contamination flags). The photometric colors were converted into reflectance spectra using the following relation: Rn=100.4[(ng)(ng)],Mathematical equation: ${R_n} = {10^{ - 0.4[(n - g) - {{(n - g)}_ \odot }]}},$(1)

where n denotes the filter and (ng) represents the solar color as reported by Holmberg et al. (2006).

After reflectance spectra were normalized at the g band, we then identified X-class asteroid candidates based on their spectral slope between 0.2–0.6 µm−1 from g to z (based on DeMeo & Carry 2013). To ensure reliability and exclude nonlinear spectra, we only selected candidates that exhibited a high correlation coefficient (R2 > 0.6) in the linear fit to their reflectance. After classifying these candidates as X-types, we cross-matched them with the NEOWISE albedo catalog to obtain their geometric albedos (pV). Finally, we defined E-type candidates as X-class asteroids with pV > 0.3 based on Tholen’s taxonomy. Using this procedure, we identified 252 possible E-type asteroids, including 54 of extremely high albedo pV > 0.5 (Fig. 4). E-type asteroids, including those identified in the literature (see Appendix A for details), are widespread in the main belt. E-type asteroids with relatively low albedo (0.3 < pV < 0.5) are clustered in some regions, possibly related to dynamical families: Eunomia, Maria, and Koronis. Note that the most extremely high albedo E-types concentrate in the Hungaria region and the low-inclination inner main belt (IMB) region.

Thumbnail: Fig. 3 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 3

Mean normalized reflectance spectra and standard deviation (shaded areas) for aubrites (dot-dashed green line), EH chondrites (solid blue line), and EL chondrites (dashed orange line) from the RELAB database, measured at a 30 phase angle. This highlights the flatter profile of aubrites versus the steeper slopes of enstatite chondrites. The spectrum of 1998 KY26 exhibits a shape consistent with EL/EH chondrites but a higher absolute reflectance typical of the aubrite group.

Thumbnail: Fig. 4 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 4

Distribution of E-type candidates in the a − sin(i) plane. The gray crosses denote the SDSS E-type candidates with 0.3 ≤ pV ≤ 0.5. The blue circles denote the same candidates as the crosses but with pV > 0.5. The black pluses represent the E-types reported in the literature with 0.3 ≤ pV ≤ 0.5. The red triangles represent the same candidates as the black pluses but with pV > 0.5 (Appendix A). The gray hatched area indicates the Hungaria region, and the dashed lines represent the ν6 secular and the mean motion resonances.

5 Discussion

5.1 Dynamical pathway for 1998 KY26

The dynamical origin of 1998 KY26 can be constrained using the near-earth object (NEO) population model (Granvik et al. 2018; Morbidelli et al. 2020; Nesvorný et al. 2023) described by Bolin et al. (2025). Their analysis indicates that the majority of near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) on KY26-like orbits are supplied from the IMB, in particular through the ν6 secular resonance, with a probability of about 67%. Additional contributions arise from the Hungaria region (∼17%) and the 3:1 mean-motion resonance with Jupiter (∼16%) (Bolin et al. 2025); a more detailed consideration of the orbital inclination strongly favors an inner-belt origin.

Following the methodology of Bottke et al. (2015) for (101955) Bennu, we consider the efficiency of Yarkovsky-driven transport. For a small (diameter ∼30 m) object such as 1998 KY26, the Yarkovsky effect induces rapid semimajor axis drift, allowing it to reach the ν6 resonance from the Nysa-Polana complex within a few million years. Notably, the low inclination of 1998 KY26 (i ∼ 1.49) is highly consistent with the low-inclination population of the IMB (i < 5). In contrast, transporting an object from the high-inclination Hungaria region (i ≈ 18–28) to a 1998 KY26-like orbit would require an improbable degree of inclination evolution, as the ν6 resonance and subsequent planetary encounters generally preserve or increase inclination unless specific close-approach geometries occur (Morbidelli et al. 2002; Bottke et al. 2015).

This strongly suggests that 1998 KY26 is more likely to originate from the IMB rather than the Hungarias, even though both reservoirs are known sources of high-albedo E-type asteroids. The ν6 resonance provides an efficient transport pathway from the vicinity of the Nysa family into Earth-crossing orbits on relatively short timescales (≤107 yr) (Scholl & Froeschle 1991). Such timescales are compatible with both the collisional lifetimes of small fragments in the main belt and the dynamical lifetime of NEAs (Morbidelli et al. 2002).

Thumbnail: Fig. 5 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 5

Distribution of candidate E-type asteroids in the a–(ug) plane. The blue symbols represent the main E-type population (E); the orange symbols show the IMB low-inclination group (E (IMB, low i)); and the green symbols correspond to the Hungaria group (E (Hungaria)). The marker shapes indicate geometric albedo: crosses for pV < 0.5 and circles for pV ≥ 0.5. A horizontal shaded band indicates the a ± 1σ range for 1998 KY26, with the mean a shown as a dashed line. The two clusters, “Linear” (lower a) and “Convex” (higher a), are separated in this space.

5.2 Spectral diversity and the bimodality of E-type asteroids

The diversity within the E-type population has been well established by previous spectroscopic studies. Based on visible and near-infrared observations, Clark et al. (2004) proposed three subgroups: E(I), characterized by featureless spectra consistent with nearly pure enstatite and represented by objects such as (64) Angelina and (434) Hungaria; E(II), showing a 0.49 µm absorption attributed to oldhamite (CaS), as seen in (2867) Steins and (3103) Eger; and E(III), exhibiting a 0.9 µm band due to Fe-bearing enstatite, with examples including (44) Nysa and (1251) Hedera. Gaffey & Kelley (2004) emphasized that these subgroups reflect different reducing formation environments, while Fornasier et al. (2008) argued that E-type spectra form a continuous sequence rather than three sharply separated classes.

To explore the diversity within E-type asteroids, we analyzed the objects identified as E-types in the SDSS sample. Figure 5 shows their distribution in the a versus ug plane, where a=0.89(gr)obj+0.45(ri)obj0.57,Mathematical equation: ${a^ * } = 0.89{(g - r)_{{\rm{obj}}}} + 0.45{(r - i)_{{\rm{obj}}}} - 0.57,$(2)

following Ivezić et al. (2001). Larger a values indicate a stronger ∼0.9 µm absorption band (i.e., more E(III)-like spectra), because the increased depression toward the iz region reddens ri and thus raises a. The horizontal axis ug primarily traces the near-UV drop. The distribution is distinctly bimodal: one cluster, the “Convex” group, exhibits a convex continuum with the 0.9 µm absorption, consistent with the E(III) subtype, whereas the other, the “Linear” group, displays an approximately linear, featureless slope characteristic of E(I) (Fig. 6). We note that the narrow ∼0.49 µm absorption diagnostic of E(II) is not reliably constrained by SDSS broadbands, and thus E(II) cannot be robustly separated in this dataset.

We derived the SDSS band reflectances Rb (b ∈ {g, r, i}) from the GTC reflectance spectrum R(λ) using a synthetic photometry approach. Instead of a local linear approximation, we computed the integrated reflectance for each band by convolving the spectrum with the SDSS filter transmission functions Tb(λ)3: Rb=R(λ)Tb(λ)dλTb(λ)dλ.Mathematical equation: ${R_b} = {{\mathop \smallint \nolimits^ R(\lambda ){T_b}(\lambda ){\rm{d}}\lambda } \over {\mathop \smallint \nolimits^ {T_b}(\lambda ){\rm{d}}\lambda }}.$(3)

To account for the limited wavelength coverage at the blue end of the g band, the spectrum was extrapolated using a second-order polynomial fit to the observed data.

Object colors follow from band-reflectance ratios, (gr)KY26=(gr)2.5log10RgRr,Mathematical equation: ${(g - r)_{{\rm{K}}{{\rm{Y}}_{26}}}} = {(g - r)_ \odot } - 2.5{\log _{10}}{{{R_g}} \over {{R_r}}},$(4) (ri)KY26=(ri)2.5log10RrRi,Mathematical equation: ${(r - i)_{{\rm{K}}{{\rm{Y}}_{26}}}} = {(r - i)_ \odot } - 2.5{\log _{10}}{{{R_r}} \over {{R_i}}},$(5)

where we correct for the contribution of the solar colors (Holmberg et al. 2006). Uncertainties on a were obtained by a Monte Carlo-like analysis: we drew (Rg, Rr, Ri) ∼ (Rb, σb) (independent) and recomputed a for 10 000 realizations; the reported value is the sample mean and its 1σ scatter. Finally, we calculated a = 0.10 ± 0.03, shown as a gray hatch in Fig. 5. We could not calculate ug because the GTC spectrum lacks coverage at the wavelength in the u filter. The range of a suggests 1998 KY26 might belong to the “Convex” group.

Figure 5 further separates the SDSS E-type sample into dynamical subpopulations. We classified the sample using dynamical cuts: the Hungaria population defined by 1.8 ≤ a ≤ 2.0 au and 0.25 ≤ sin i ≤ 0.5, and the low-inclination IMB group defined by 2.0 ≤ a ≤ 2.52 au and 0 ≤ sin i ≤ 0.2. Most of the Hungaria population (green) has high geometric albedo (pV > 0.5) and falls in the “Linear” cluster, consistent with the classification of (434) Hungaria as E(I). By contrast, the IMB, low-inclination E types (likely related to the Nysa complex; orange) populate both clusters: their pV > 0.5 subset overlaps the Hungaria members in the “Linear” cluster; nevertheless, several IMB objects with only moderate albedo still belong to the “Linear” group as well.

Given this context, 1998 KY26 shows a convex continuum across the visible and hints at a ∼0.9 µm absorption, placing it in our “Convex” cluster and making it more akin to E(III) exemplars such as (44) Nysa than to the “Linear”, E(I)-like Hungarias. Although the ∼0.9 µm feature is not unambiguously detected in KY26 due to observational limitations, the overall curvature argues for a closer affinity with the Nysa-like E(III) population than with the Hungaria E(I) group, supporting an IMB origin.

Thumbnail: Fig. 6 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 6

Reflectance spectra for the SDSS E-type sample by cluster. Each thin curve shows an individual object’s reflectance spectra normalized at the g band (0.48 µm). The thick colored curves represent the cluster means (“Linear” and “Convex”). The clusters are defined in the a–(ug) plane (Fig. 5).

5.3 Nysa family and its parent body

The Nysa region of the IMB (a ≃ 2.41−2.50 au, e ≃ 0.12−0.21, i ≃ 1−10) represents one of the most compositionally complex zones in the asteroid belt, characterized by the coexistence of diverse taxonomic groups including C, S, and X (E/M). What has historically been referred to as the “Nysa-Polana family” is now understood to be a superposition of several overlapping clusters with distinct spectral properties. Earlier work emphasized this complexity: Cellino et al. (2001) argued that the Nysa–Polana clan is a superposition of distinct families and that high-albedo asteroids possibly associated with (44) Nysa coexist with the low-albedo C-type population of the Polana–Eulalia families. Walsh et al. (2013) identified Eulalia and redefined Polana as two separate low-albedo families, while in later work by de León et al. (2016) in the visible and Pinilla-Alonso et al. (2016) in the near-infrared showed that these two families had identical spectra. Moreover, an additional group of M- and S-type objects, possibly related to (135) Hertha, were found (e.g., Cellino et al. 2001; Fornasier et al. 2008). Dykhuis & Greenberg (2015) further subdivided the region into Hertha 1 (S-type), Hertha 2 (X-type), Polana, and two Eulalia families, concluding that (44) Nysa is likely an isolated E-type interloper.

Note that both (44) Nysa and (135) Hertha exhibit spectral shapes that can be broadly associated with the X-complex. However, their physical properties diverge significantly. Nysa is a high-albedo object (pV ∼ 0.48) and is spectrally classified as an E(III)-type, exhibiting the 0.9 µm absorption band characteristic of Fe-bearing enstatite. In contrast, Hertha has a much lower albedo (pV ∼ 0.14) despite its X-type-like spectral continuum, placing it closer to the M- or even low-end S-type regime. The coexistence of E- and M-type objects within the same dynamical region further underscores the compositional complexity of the Nysa–Polana–Hertha complex.

To investigate the albedo distribution of the Nysa–Polana complex, we cross–matched the Nysa–Polana family membership list by Nesvorný et al. (2015) with the NEOWISE catalog (Mainzer et al. 2019) and extracted the geometric albedo pV. The resulting distribution exhibits a prominent bimodal structure, though the high-albedo group shows a broad and asymmetric spread. This comprises a group of low–albedo asteroids (Polana-like) and a distinct group of high–albedo asteroids (Nysa and Hertha-like). To quantitatively characterize this complex structure and account for the observed asymmetry, we fitted the geometric albedo histogram using a Gaussian mixture model (GMM) with three components (Fig. 7). The model was optimized with the expectation–maximization algorithm, assuming full covariance matrices.

The fitted model converged to three distinct Gaussian components with mean albedos of approximately 0.06, 0.23, and 0.35, possibly corresponding to the dark Polana–Eulalia complex, an intermediate Hertha cluster, and the bright Nysa group, respectively. This analysis shows significant high-albedo members in this dynamical region, suggesting the coexistence of at least four independent families: Nysa, Hertha, Polana, and Eulalia.

Our identification of a statistically significant cluster of high-albedo objects indicates that Nysa is not simply an isolated body but the largest member of a distinct Nysa family. This finding highlights an overlooked E-type reservoir in the IMB, which could serve as an additional source of high-albedo near-Earth asteroids such as 1998 KY26.

This albedo distribution provides a key link to meteorite analogs. The intermediate albedo component (pV ∼ 0.23) is consistent with enstatite chondrites. For instance, the <25µm sample of EL6 chondrite ALH 81021 has a reflectance of 18%, converted to an equivalent geometric albedo of 21%. While this matches the Hertha-like component, it is significantly lower than the pV ∼ 0.52 estimated for 1998 KY26 (Santana-Ros et al. 2025). In contrast, aubrites (enstatite achondrites) typically exhibit equivalent geometric albedos exceeding 0.4. As shown by Clark et al. (2004), the high albedo of E(III) objects is best reproduced by differentiated aubritic material. The high albedo of 1998 KY26 therefore strongly suggests it is a fragment of a differentiated E-type crust, akin to (44) Nysa, rather than an undifferentiated enstatite chondritic body.

Moreover, the reflectance spectrum of 1998 KY26 provides an intriguing link between Nysa and Hertha. While its high geometric albedo (pV ∼ 0.52) is fully consistent with an E-type classification and hence with Nysa (pV ∼ 0.48), its spectral shape more closely resembles that of Hertha, showing a similar convex continuum in the visible range (see Fig. 8). The coexistence of Nysa-like albedo and Hertha-like spectral morphology in 1998 KY26 suggests that these two large bodies may share a deeper genetic connection. One possible interpretation is that Nysa and Hertha could be remnants of a common differentiated parent body (Tedesco et al. 1982), with 1998 KY26 representing a small fragment sampling both the high-albedo enstatite-rich component (as seen in Nysa) and the spectral slope characteristics typical of Hertha.

In this view, 1998 KY26, representing a “hybrid” fragment – a polymict rock sampled from the boundary between the high-albedo crust and the deeper, more iron-rich layers – serves as direct evidence linking these two populations resulting from the large-scale disruption of their common progenitor. Importantly, the forthcoming Hayabusa2 rendezvous with 1998 KY26 will provide the first opportunity to directly examine such a fragment in situ. By characterizing its surface composition and physical properties at close range, the mission may resolve the longstanding puzzle of whether E-type Nysa and M-type Hertha share a common parent body and thereby shed new light on the collisional and differentiation history of the IMB.

Thumbnail: Fig. 7 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 7

Distribution of the geometric albedo (pV) for members of the Nysa-Polana complex, cross-matched with NEOWISE. The histogram is fitted with a three-component GMM. The color curves represent the individual fitted components, defined by their mean albedo (µ), standard deviation (σ), and mixing weight (w), corresponding to the dark Polana-Eulalia complex (pV ∼ 0.06), an intermediate Hertha group (pV ∼ 0.23), and the bright Nysa group (pV ∼ 0.35).

Thumbnail: Fig. 8 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 8

GTC visible reflectance spectrum of 1998 KY26 (red) compared with the visible spectra of (44) Nysa from Bus & Binzel (2002b) (gray), its near-infrared spectrum from Clark et al. (2004) (black), joined using their common wavelength interval of 0.8–0.9 µm, and the spectrum of (135) Hertha from Fornasier et al. (2010) (blue).

6 Conclusions

We presented new GTC spectroscopic observations and a reanalysis of albedo distributions in the Nysa–Polana complex to investigate the nature and origin of the Hayabusa2# target, 1998 KY26. The GTC spectrum indicates an X-type in Tholen’s taxonomy and Xe-type in Bus-DeMeo’s taxonomy. When combined with independent albedo constraints (pV ∼ 0.52), 1998 KY26 is best interpreted as an E-type asteroid.

In the a–(ug) plane, SDSS E-types separate into a featureless “Linear” cluster (E[I]) and a “Convex” cluster with stronger ∼0.9 µm absorption (E[III]); the narrow ∼0.49 µm E(II) band cannot be isolated with SDSS broadbands. Most of the Hungaria population has pV > 0.5 and lies in the “Linear” cluster, while the low-inclination IMB E-types (Nysa-related) populate both clusters, including “Linear” members with only moderate albedo. For 1998 KY26, we estimate a = 0.11 ± 0.08. Its convex continuum and permitted a range favor the “Convex”/E(III) group and an IMB (Nysa) origin over Hungaria.

Our GMM analysis of NEOWISE albedos confirms that the Nysa-Polana region hosts multiple overlapping families, including low-albedo Polana and Eulalia groups, an intermediate-albedo Hertha cluster, and a distinct high-albedo population associated with (44) Nysa. While previous work from Dykhuis & Greenberg (2015) considered Nysa to be an isolated E-type object, our results identify a statistically significant cluster of high-albedo asteroids in this region, supporting the existence of a previously unrecognized Nysa family.

The spectrum of 1998 KY26 resembles that of Hertha in its overall convex continuum while maintaining the high albedo typical of Nysa, suggesting a possible genetic link between the two large bodies. This hybrid nature supports the classical model of Tedesco et al. (1982), wherein Nysa and Hertha represent different layers of a single differentiated parent body. In particular, 1998 KY26 displays a convex spectral morphology closer to the E(III)-type Nysa than to the nearly linear E(I or II)-type Hungarias, and dynamical models indicate that KY26-like orbits are most likely supplied through ν6 resonance (Bolin et al. 2025). Taken together, these results strongly suggest that 1998 KY26 originated from the Nysa family rather than the Hungaria region.

The upcoming Hayabusa2 rendezvous with 1998 KY26 in 2031 offers a unique opportunity to test these hypotheses. In situ measurements of this small, optically bright, rapidly rotating asteroid will directly constrain its composition and surface properties, potentially resolving whether Nysa and Hertha share a common parent body and shedding new light on the collisional and differentiation history of the IMB.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the anonymous referee for the insightful comments. This work is supported by JAXA Hayabusa2# International Visibility Enhancement Project. E.T. acknowledges support from Spanish government – Ayuda Ramón y Cajal 2023 (RYC2023-043483-I). J.d.L. acknowledges support from the Agencia Estatal de Investigacion del Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (AEI-MCINN) under grant “Hydrated Minerals and Organic Compounds in Primitive Asteroids” with reference PID2020-120464GB-100. Based on observations made with the Gran Telescopio Canarias (GTC), installed at the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, on the island of La Palma. This research utilizes spectra with the NASA RELAB facility at Brown University.

References

  1. Barucci, M. A., Fulchignoni, M., Fornasier, S., et al. 2005, A&A, 430, 313 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beck, P., Schmitt, B., Potin, S., Pommerol, A., & Brissaud, O. 2021, Icarus, 354, 114066 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bell, J. F., Davis, D. R., Hartmann, W. K., & Gaffey, M. J. 1989, in Asteroids II, eds. R. P. Binzel, T. Gehrels, & M. S. Matthews (Tucson: University of Arizona Press), 921 [Google Scholar]
  4. Beniyama, J., Sako, S., Ohtsuka, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 955, 143 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beniyama, J., Müller, T. G., Delbo, M., et al. 2025, AJ, 169, 264 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bolin, B. T., Fremling, C., Belyakov, M., et al. 2025, AJ, 169, 303 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bottke, W. F., Vokrouhlickỳ, D., Walsh, K. J., et al. 2015, Icarus, 247, 191 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, P. G., Assink, J. D., Astiz, L., et al. 2013, Nature, 503, 238 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bus, S. J., & Binzel, R. P. 2002a, Icarus, 158, 146 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bus, S. J., & Binzel, R. P. 2002b, Icarus, 158, 106 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cellino, A., Zappalà, V., Doressoundiram, A., et al. 2001, Icarus, 152, 225 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cepa, J. 2010, Highlights of Spanish Astrophysics V, Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings (Berlin: Springer), 14, 15 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cepa, J., Aguiar, M., Escalera, V. G., et al. 2000, SPIE Conf. Ser., 4008, 623 [Google Scholar]
  14. Clark, B. E., Bus, S. J., Rivkin, A. S., Shepard, M. K., & Shah, S. 2004, J. Geophys. Res. Planets, 109, E02001 [Google Scholar]
  15. de León, J., Pinilla-Alonso, N., Delbo, M., et al. 2016, Icarus, 266, 57 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. DeMeo, F., & Binzel, R. P. 2008, Icarus, 194, 436 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. DeMeo, F., & Carry, B. 2013, Icarus, 226, 723 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. DeMeo, F. E., Binzel, R. P., Slivan, S. M., & Bus, S. J. 2009, Icarus, 202, 160 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dykhuis, M. J., & Greenberg, R. 2015, Icarus, 252, 199 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fornasier, S., Migliorini, A., Dotto, E., & Barucci, M. A. 2008, Icarus, 196, 119 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fornasier, S., Clark, B. E., Dotto, E., et al. 2010, Icarus, 210, 655 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gaffey, M. J., & Kelley, M. S. 2004, in Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 1812 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gaffey, M. J., Reed, K. L., & Kelley, M. S. 1992, Icarus, 100, 95 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Granvik, M., Morbidelli, A., Jedicke, R., et al. 2018, Icarus, 312, 181 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Grossman, J. N. 1994, Meteoritics, 29, 100 [Google Scholar]
  26. Harris, A. W., Mueller, M., Delbó, M., & Bus, S. J. 2007, Icarus, 188, 414 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hirabayashi, M., Mimasu, Y., Sakatani, N., et al. 2021, Adv. Space Res., 68, 1533 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Holmberg, J., Flynn, C., & Portinari, L. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 449 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ivezić, Ž., Tabachnik, S., Rafikov, R., et al. 2001, AJ, 122, 2749 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kikuchi, S., Mimasu, Y., Takei, Y., et al. 2023, Acta Astronautica, 211, 295 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lazzaro, D., Angeli, C. A., Carvano, J. M., et al. 2004, Icarus, 172, 179 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mahlke, M., Carry, B., & Mattei, P.-A. 2022, A&A, 665, A26 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mainzer, A., Bauer, J., Cutri, R., et al. 2019, NASA Planetary Data System (USA: NASA) [Google Scholar]
  34. Masiero, J. R., Nugent, C., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 168 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Morbidelli, A., Bottke, W., Froeschlé, C., et al. 2002, Asteroids III (Tucson: University of Arizona Press), 409 [Google Scholar]
  36. Morbidelli, A., Delbo, M., Granvik, M., et al. 2020, Icarus, 340, 113631 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nesvorný, D., Brož, M., & Carruba, V. 2015, in Asteroids IV (Tucson: University of Arizona Press), 297 [Google Scholar]
  38. Nesvorný, D., Deienno, R., Bottke, W. F., et al. 2023, AJ, 166, 55 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ostro, S. J., Pravec, P., Benner, L. A. M., et al. 1999, Science, 285, 557 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pieters, C. M., & Hiroi, T. 2004, in Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, 1720 [Google Scholar]
  41. Pinilla-Alonso, N., de León, J., Walsh, K., et al. 2016, Icarus, 274, 231 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Popescu, M., Birlan, M., & Nedelcu, D. A. 2012, A&A, 544, A130 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  43. Popescu, M. M., Văduvescu, O., de León, J., et al. 2023, A&A, 676, A126 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  44. Reddy, V., Kelley, M. S., Benner, L., et al. 2024, The Planetary Science Journal, 5, 141 [Google Scholar]
  45. Rivkin, A. S., Mueller, T., MacLennan, E., et al. 2025, Res. Notes Am. Astron. Soc., 9, 70 [Google Scholar]
  46. Santana-Ros, T., Bartczak, P., Muinonen, K., et al. 2025, Nat. Commun., 16, 8275 [Google Scholar]
  47. Scholl, H., & Froeschle, C. 1991, A&A, 245, 316 [Google Scholar]
  48. Sergeyev, A. V., & Carry, B. 2021, A&A, 652, A59 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tatsumi, E., Vilas, F., de León, J., et al. 2023, A&A, 672, A189 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tatsumi, E., Vilas, F., de León, J., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A140 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tedesco, E. F., Tholen, D. J., & Zellner, B. 1982, AJ, 87, 1585 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Tholen, D. J. 1984, PhD thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA [Google Scholar]
  53. Walsh, K. J., Delbó, M., Bottke, W. F., Vokrouhlickỳ, D., & Lauretta, D. S. 2013, Icarus, 225, 283 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Xu, S., Binzel, R. P., Burbine, T. H., & Bus, S. J. 1995, Icarus, 115, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Appendix A E type asteroids from the literature

We cataloged E-type asteroids identified in earlier work in Table A.1. X/Xe-class objects were considered E type if their geometric albedo was greater than 0.3 (pV > 0.3).

Table A.1

E-type asteroids from the literature.

All Tables

Table A.1

E-type asteroids from the literature.

All Figures

Thumbnail: Fig. 1 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 1

Visible reflectance spectrum of 1998 KY26 observed with OSIRIS+ at the 10.4 m GTC on May 21, 2024. The averaged spectrum is shown in black, with the associated 1σ error of the average in gray.

In the text
Thumbnail: Fig. 2 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 2

Reflectance spectrum of 1998 KY26 (black) compared with the three best-matching taxonomic reference spectra from DeMeo et al. (2009) and Mahlke et al. (2022). The spectrum obtained by Bolin et al. (2025) is also depicted in red.

In the text
Thumbnail: Fig. 3 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 3

Mean normalized reflectance spectra and standard deviation (shaded areas) for aubrites (dot-dashed green line), EH chondrites (solid blue line), and EL chondrites (dashed orange line) from the RELAB database, measured at a 30 phase angle. This highlights the flatter profile of aubrites versus the steeper slopes of enstatite chondrites. The spectrum of 1998 KY26 exhibits a shape consistent with EL/EH chondrites but a higher absolute reflectance typical of the aubrite group.

In the text
Thumbnail: Fig. 4 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 4

Distribution of E-type candidates in the a − sin(i) plane. The gray crosses denote the SDSS E-type candidates with 0.3 ≤ pV ≤ 0.5. The blue circles denote the same candidates as the crosses but with pV > 0.5. The black pluses represent the E-types reported in the literature with 0.3 ≤ pV ≤ 0.5. The red triangles represent the same candidates as the black pluses but with pV > 0.5 (Appendix A). The gray hatched area indicates the Hungaria region, and the dashed lines represent the ν6 secular and the mean motion resonances.

In the text
Thumbnail: Fig. 5 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 5

Distribution of candidate E-type asteroids in the a–(ug) plane. The blue symbols represent the main E-type population (E); the orange symbols show the IMB low-inclination group (E (IMB, low i)); and the green symbols correspond to the Hungaria group (E (Hungaria)). The marker shapes indicate geometric albedo: crosses for pV < 0.5 and circles for pV ≥ 0.5. A horizontal shaded band indicates the a ± 1σ range for 1998 KY26, with the mean a shown as a dashed line. The two clusters, “Linear” (lower a) and “Convex” (higher a), are separated in this space.

In the text
Thumbnail: Fig. 6 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 6

Reflectance spectra for the SDSS E-type sample by cluster. Each thin curve shows an individual object’s reflectance spectra normalized at the g band (0.48 µm). The thick colored curves represent the cluster means (“Linear” and “Convex”). The clusters are defined in the a–(ug) plane (Fig. 5).

In the text
Thumbnail: Fig. 7 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 7

Distribution of the geometric albedo (pV) for members of the Nysa-Polana complex, cross-matched with NEOWISE. The histogram is fitted with a three-component GMM. The color curves represent the individual fitted components, defined by their mean albedo (µ), standard deviation (σ), and mixing weight (w), corresponding to the dark Polana-Eulalia complex (pV ∼ 0.06), an intermediate Hertha group (pV ∼ 0.23), and the bright Nysa group (pV ∼ 0.35).

In the text
Thumbnail: Fig. 8 Refer to the following caption and surrounding text. Fig. 8

GTC visible reflectance spectrum of 1998 KY26 (red) compared with the visible spectra of (44) Nysa from Bus & Binzel (2002b) (gray), its near-infrared spectrum from Clark et al. (2004) (black), joined using their common wavelength interval of 0.8–0.9 µm, and the spectrum of (135) Hertha from Fornasier et al. (2010) (blue).

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.