Table 3
Comparison of linear, quadratic, and cubic ephemeris model for WASP-19b.
| Quantity | Linear ephemeris | Quadratic ephemeris | Cubic ephemeris |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reference time (T0; BJD(TDB)-2 400 000) |
55183.167643±0.000061 | 55183.167527±0.000074 | 55183.167368±0.000080 |
| Period (Pb; days) | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Quadratic term (p 1) | ![]() |
![]() |
|
| Cubic term (p2) | ![]() |
||
| χ2 | 547.02 | 516.29 | 468.47 |
![]() |
4.84 | 4.61 | 4.22 |
| AIC | 551.02 | 522.29 | 476.47 |
| BIC | 556.51 | 530.53 | 487.45 |
| r.m.s. of residuals (s) | 48.54 | 47.51 | 46.31 |
Notes. The models are fitted to the full set of mid-transit times spanning 2008-2025 (Table A.2). The table lists the raw χ2, reduced
, Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) values computed directly from the measured timing uncertainties. While none of the models fully reproduces the observed scatter in the timing residuals, the cubic ephemeris yields the lowest information-criterion values among the tested models.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.






