Fig. B.2

Download original image
Top: Teff obtained with isochrone best-fitting method (from PARSEC isochrones, Bressan et al. 2012) compared against Teff obtained via IRFM (color-temperature relations, González Hernández & Bonifacio 2009, upper panel) and XPP (Zhang et al. 2023, lower panel). Bottom: Teff obtained with XPP vs. Teff obtained with IRFM. The 1 -to- 1 relation is shown as a gray dashed line, whereas the best fit (considering GC and OC stars) is shown as a dot-dashed green line. BSSs from GCs are displayed as red stars and BSSs from OCs as blue squares. The figure only displays BSSs whose error in both components is less than 300 K.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.