Table 4.
Polarization degree and angle for different scenarios, applying polconst to each component.
Component | PD (%) | PA (deg) |
---|---|---|
Disk | < 5.4 | Unconstrained |
Compton+PL | [0] | – |
Reflection | [0] | – |
Disk | [0] | – |
Compton+PL | < 1.2 | Unconstrained |
Reflection | [0] | – |
Disk | [0] | – |
Compton+PL | [0] | – |
Reflection | 8.9 ± 6.8 | 107 ± 33 |
Disk | 8.7 ± 4.1 | 34 ± 14 |
Compton+PL | [1] | 120 ± 13 |
Reflection | 16.4 ± 13.2 | =PA Compton+PL |
Disk | 7.6 ± 3.6 | 34 ± 15 |
Compton+PL | 1.1 ± 0.7 | 120 ± 14 |
Reflection | [10] | =PA Compton+PL |
Notes. The errors are at the 90% confidence level, while upper limits are reported at the 99% confidence level. Parameters in square brackets are frozen. When only one component is polarized, the three best fits are statistically equivalent (χ2/d.o.f. = 1407.9/1337), while the fit improves in the last two cases (χ2/d.o.f. = 1396.1/1335).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.