Table 3
Comparison between the observed and CLOUDY model predicted line fluxes.
Lines | Rest wavelength (μm) | Observed line flux (10−18 Wm−2) | Predicted line flux (10−18 W m−2) | Ratio (Observed / Predicted) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This work(*) | Neufeld et al. (2020) | This work | Neufeld et al. (2020) | |||
HeH+ (υ, J) = (0,1 → 0,0) | 149.091 | 163 ± 32 | 47.35 | 56 | 3.44 ± 0.68 | 2.86 ± 0.56 |
HeH+ (υ, J) = (1,0 → 0,1) [P(1)] | 3.51532 | 1.55 ± 0.16 | 0.81 | 1.68 | 1.91 ± 0.20 | 0.92 ± 0.095 |
HeH+ (υ, J) = (1,1 → 0,2) [P(2)] | 3.60677 | 2.08 ± 0.31 | 0.91 | 0.89 | 2.29 ± 0.34 | 2.33 ± 0.35 |
H I 19 − 6 | 3.64493 | 23.9 ± 0.22 | 20.44 | 34.6 | 1.17 ± 0.011 | 0.69 ± 0.006 |
He II 13 − 9 | 3.54328 | 53.7 ± 0.21 | 44.20 | 108 | 1 .22 ± 0.005 | 0.50 ± 0.002 |
He I 53 D − 43P0 | 3.70256 | 8.44 ± 0.48 | 11.35 | 12.8 | 0.74 ± 0.042 | 0.66 ± 0.038 |
Notes. (*)The line fluxes in CLOUDY are given in units of erg s−1 cm−2. To compare with the observations, we converted them to W m−2, accounting for the observational angular sizes tabulated in Table 4 (see notes) of Neufeld et al. (2020). The conversion formula used are: Predicted flux (W m−2) for . Predicted flux (W m−2) for HeH+ υ = 1 → 0 P(1), P(2), H i, He ii, and
.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.