Table 1.
Percentage impact of different sources of uncertainty on FORESTFLOW predictions and overall accuracy.
| Type | P3D | P1D | bδ | bη | P3D, ⊥lin | P3D, ∥lin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C. var. fit (a) | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| C. var. data (b) | 1.3 | 0.5 | – | – | – | – |
| C. var. & fit (c) | 2.4 | 0.6 | – | – | – | – |
| Emu. center (d) | 2.6 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Emu. overall (e) | 3.4 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 2.9 |
Notes. The second and third columns show the results for P3D and P1D over the intervals 0.5 < k [Mpc−1]< 5 and 0.09 < k‖ [Mpc−1] < 4 intervals, respectively, while the last two columns do so for perpendicular and parallel P3D linear modes.
Impact of cosmic variance on the best-fitting P3D model to simulation measurements (see Appendix A).
Impact of cosmic variance on simulation measurements (see Appendix A).
Joint impact of cosmic variance and the limited flexibility of the P3D model (see Sect. 3.4).
Performance of FORESTFLOW at the center of the parameter space, estimated using the CENTRAL simulation (see Sect. 5.1).
Accuracy of FORESTFLOW across the parameter space, estimated via leave-simulation-out tests (see Sect. 5.1).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.