Table 2
Significance results for comparing models.
| Method | UNet++ | SwinUNet | PE-UNet-D | PE-UNet-I | PE-UNet-L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNet | 0.2881 | 0.0792 | 0.7464 | 0.9803 | 0.0175 |
| UNet++ | 0.0060 | 0.8168 | 0.7948 | 0.0061 | |
| SwinUNet | 0.0585 | 0.3305 | 0.0031 | ||
| PE-UNet-D | 0.8430 | 0.0006 | |||
| PE-UNet-I | 0.1676 |
Notes. The table reports p-values obtained from paired t-tests on the DSC metric. A test is run to compare every pair of models. A p-value below 0.05 suggests that the difference in DSC between the two studied architectures is significant with a confidence of 95%. Values in bold are p-values lower than 0.05.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.