Open Access
Table 4
Comparison of stellar mass estimates between our catalog and reference catalogs.
| catalog | N | Δ | NMAD | r | err |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COSMOS2020(FARMER) | 1899 | 0.001 | 0.176 | 0.96 | 0.132 |
| COSMOS2020(CLASSIC) | 2485 | −0.014 | 0.156 | 0.97 | 0.125 |
| DEVILS | 5080 | −0.100 | 0.207 | 0.82 | 0.142 |
| SDSS(Firefly) | 24 947 | 0.060 | 0.321 | 0.85 | 0.097 |
| SDSS(MPA-JHU) | 18 778 | −0.071 | 0.126 | 0.98 | 0.100 |
| GSWLC | 17 902 | −0.191 | 0.284 | 0.97 | 0.100 |
| Zou et al. (2024) | 761 096 | −0.105 | 0.173 | 0.98 | 0.120 |
| FastSpecFit 3.2 | 1 121 332 | −0.318 | 0.503 | 0.85 | 0.156 |
| PROVABGS | 215 123 | −0.393 | 0.582 | 0.89 | 0.116 |
Notes. The median difference (Δ), NMAD and Pearson coefficient (r; see Sect. 5.1 for definitions), and the median error of stellar masses (err) for the given sample (with a N number of sources) are provided.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.