Table 2.
Properties of our imaged dataset.
| Galaxy | Beam | Δνchan | rms | P.c. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [″] | [kpc] | [km s−1] | [mJy/beam] | ||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | |
| IC 1954 | 15.2 | 0.94 | 1.4 | 0.51 | M |
| NGC 1512 | 15 | 1.36 | 5.5 | 0.22 | P-M |
| NGC 1566 | 12.7 | 1.08 | 1.4 | 0.18 | M |
| NGC 1672 | 15.4 | 1.44 | 1.4 | 0.50 | M |
| NGC 3511 | 14.3 | 1.30 | 1.4 | 0.58 | M |
| NGC 4535 | 15 | 1.14 | 5.5 | 0.28 | P-M |
| NGC 5068 | 13.4 | 0.34 | 1.4 | 0.17 | M |
| NGC 7496 | 15 | 1.35 | 5.5 | 0.20 | P-M |
Notes. (1–2): The size of the beam in angular and linear scales (adopting distances from Table 1). We used a robust = 0.5 for the P-M galaxies, and robust = 1.5 for the M galaxies. (3): The channel width, i.e. spectral resolution. (4): Root mean square (rms) noise. (5): Project codes: P-M = PHANGS-MeerKAT (cycle 0 observation, MKT-20163); this work. M = MHONGOOSE (MKT-SCI-20180515-EB-01) (de Blok et al. 2016). To be able to compare these galaxies, we sample all of them on a hexagonal sampling grid with 1.5 kpc sized apertures (driven by the worst linear resolution in our sample, NGC 1672).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.