Open Access

Table I.1.

Spectroscopic parameters (from NIST5 and Haris & Kramida 2017) of the neutral carbon lines discussed in the text, intensities of the lines detected by JWST and ALMA in d203-506, and model predictions.

λa (μm) Transition (u−l) Eu/kB (cm−1) Aul (s−1) I obs , b ON OFF $ I_\mathrm{obs\,,\,\it{b}}^{\mathrm{ON-OFF}} $ (1σ error) I corr b , c ON OFF $ I^{\mathrm{ON-OFF}}_\mathrm{corr\,\it{b,\,c}} $ IPDR model, b, d IPDR model, b, e
609.1354 (2p2) 3P1 – (2p2) 3P0 16.4 7.93E-08 1.62E-06 (9.77E-8) 1.62E-06 (1.60–1.64)E-06 (1.60–1.64)E-06
370.4151 (2p2) 3P2 – (2p2) 3P1 43.4 2.65E-07 (0.95–1.03)E-05 (0.95–1.03)E-05

0.982682 (2p2) 1D2 – (2p2) 3P1 10192.6 7.30E-05
0.985296 (2p2) 1D2 – (2p2) 3P2 10192.6 2.20E-04

0.984 (sum) (2p2) 1D2 – (2p2) 3P2 4.18E-04 (1.81E-05) 8.51E-04 (2.14–4.90)E-04 (1.07–2.04)E-05

0.872953 (2p2) 1S0–(2p2) 1D2 21648.0 6.00E-01 (3.49–6.84)E-05 (0.90–1.07)E-06

1.068601 (3p) 3D2 – (3s) 3P 1 o $ ^{\mathrm{o}}_{1} $ 69710.6 1.40E+07
1.068827 (3p) 3D1 – (3s) 3P 0 o $ ^{\mathrm{o}}_{0} $ 69744.1 1.04E+07
1.069417 (3p) 3D3 – (3s) 3P 2 o $ ^{\mathrm{o}}_{2} $ 69744.1 1.84E+07
1.071027 (3p) 3D1 – (3s) 3P 1 o $ ^{\mathrm{o}}_{1} $ 69689.5 7.50E+06
1.073247 (3p) 3D2 – (3s) 3P 2 o $ ^{\mathrm{o}}_{2} $ 69710.6 4.40E+06
1.075692 (3p) 3D1 – (3s) 3P 2 o $ ^{\mathrm{o}}_{2} $ 69689.5 4.80E+05

1.069 (sum) (3p) 3D – 3P0 1.67E-04 (3.67E-05) 3.23E-04 (1.60–2.92)E-04 (2.36–2.51)E-06

1.175145 (3d) 3F 2 o $ ^{\mathrm{o}}_{2} $ – (3p) 3D1 78199.1 2.29E+07
1.175653 (3d) 3F 4 o $ ^{\mathrm{o}}_{4} $ – (3p) 3D3 78249.9 2.60E+07
1.175800 (3d) 3F 3 o $ ^{\mathrm{o}}_{3} $ – (3p) 3D2 78215.5 2.40E+07
1.178077 (3d) 3F 2 o $ ^{\mathrm{o}}_{2} $ – (3p) 3D2 78199.1 2.90E+06
1.180431 (3d) 3F 3 o $ ^{\mathrm{o}}_{3} $ – (3p) 3D3 78215.5 1.26E+06
1.182727 (3d) 3F 2 o $ ^{\mathrm{o}}_{2} $ – (3p) 3D3 78199.1 2.90E+03

1.176 (sum) (3d) 3Fo3D 1.71E-05 (9.87E-06) 3.08E-05 (3.61–5.96)E-05 (1.05–1.14)E-06

1.350596 (4s) 3P 2 o $ ^{\mathrm{o}}_{2} $ – (3p) 3S1 78148.1 6.60E+06
1.356337 (4s) 3P 1 o $ ^{\mathrm{o}}_{1} $ – (3p) 3S1 78116.7 6.50E+06
1.358506 (4s) 3P 0 o $ ^{\mathrm{o}}_{0} $ – (3p) 3S1 78105.0 6.60E+06

1.355 (sum) (4s) 3Po – (3p) 3S 2.82E-05 (5.75E-06) 4.55E-05 (2.55–4.75)E-05 (1.71–1.60)E-07

Notes. aWavelengths in a vacuum. †Observed with MUSE (Haworth et al. 2023) and quoted also as the [C I] 8729 Å line. bIn units of erg cm−2 s−1 sr−1. cAdopting AV = 1.5 mag of foreground extinction (see text). dLine intensity predicted by the reference PDR model (including C0 FUV-pumping and C+ recombination cascades) with G0 ≃ (1–2)×104, nH = 107 cm−3, and xC = 1.4×10−4. e Same but neglecting FUV-pumping of C0 lines.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.