Open Access

Table 1.

Summary of the percentage of absorption lines with a discrepancy between true physical parameters and CNN predictions exceeding σ90 (90% percentile derived from simulated test data).

Sno. Lines Data Δb > σ90b[median N] ΔN > σ90N[median b] Δb > σ90b & ΔN > σ90N

S/N < 20 S/N > 20 S/N < 20 S/N > 20 S/N < 20 S/N > 20
1 Single D16 12.8% [13.35] 14.8% [12.70] 9.4% [32.50] 2.4% [34.60] 5.0% 0.3%
2 Single D16 mock 6.2% [13.24] 7.5% [12.77] 2.8% [28.70] 0.5% [18.80] 0.4% 0.0%
3 Single VIPER 14.1% [13.22] 13.0% [12.74] 7.6% [29.17] 2.7% [34.71] 3.5% 0.4%
4 Single VIPER mock 6.6% [13.16] 5.2% [12.64] 5.2% [24.32] 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
5 Double C1 D16 33.8% [13.34] 25.0% [12.84] 11.0% [35.90] 5.3% [29.80] 4.4% 2.6%
6 Double C1 D16 mock 8.0% [13.16] 8.0% [12.82] 4.0% [24.80] 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
7 Double C1 VIPER 25.5% [13.23] 23.5% [12.76] 11.5% [25.20] 8.6% [27.34] 4.5% 4.9%
8 Double C1 VIPER mock 11.5% [13.28] 9.3% [12.55] 4.1% [26.21] 2.7% [38.12] 0.0% 1.3%
9 Double C2 D16 19.9% [13.32] 26.3% [12.78] 14.0% [32.70] 6.6% [38.40] 5.1% 3.9%
10 Double C2 D16 mock 5.6% [13.18] 4.0% [12.71] 7.2% [22.50] 1.3% [36.40] 0.0% 0.0%
11 Double C2 VIPER 26.1% [13.08] 29.6% [12.54] 12.7% [30.49] 11.1% [27.78] 3.8% 4.9%
12 Double C2 VIPER mock 15.5% [12.98] 16.0% [12.99] 5.4% [27.36] 4.0% [20.10] 0.7% 2.7%

Notes. σ90b and σ90N for single line is taken from Fig. 8 and for double line from Fig. 10. Single-line data are shown in rows 1–4, double-line component 1 (C1) in rows 5–8, and double-line component 2 (C2) in rows 9–12.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.