Table 3
Results of the accretion disk model comparison.
| Model | log ![$\[\mathcal{L}\]$](/articles/aa/full_html/2024/08/aa49329-24/aa49329-24-eq25.png){kind=small} |
log Z | log P(M|D) | AIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R06 | −34.70 | −81.06 | 48.27% | 197.81 |
| THB21 | −26.14 | −75.96 | 48.73% | 158.4 |
| SN12 | −34.21 | −80.82 | 45.62% | 197.54 |
| KD18 | −48.99 | −100.49 | 47.66% | 265.61 |
Notes. Results of the accretion disk model comparison based on the median values of different criteria: The maximum logarithm of the likelihood, the logarithm of the evidence, the posterior probability and the Akaike information criterion (AIC), computed by assuming all models have the same prior probability.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.