Radial profiles of the Σ_M⋆ (top), Σ_SFR (middle), and sSFR (bottom) of AGN and the mass-matched SF sample. We can see that the mass profiles show similar characteristics. In other words, we can see that the AGN are still slightly more compact than the SF sample, but consistent within the errors. AGN display a higher Σ_SFR profile compared to that of the SF sample. Their sSFR profiles seem to suggest that X-ray AGN enhance star formation in the outer regions of their host galaxies and quench the center, whereas we find the exact opposite scenario for the SF sample. Error bars represent the 3σ confidence intervals.