Open Access
Table D.1
Differences in optimal frequencies.
| Target | ∆ Lomb-Scargle | ∆ Kernel regression | Sample size |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRTS (1) | 3.9 10−5 | 2.0 10−6 | 1414 |
| CRTS (2) | 8.2 10−5 | 2.0 10−6 | 1534 |
| MLT (1) | 2.638773 | 1.0 10−6 | 1350 |
| MLT (2) | 1.877300 | 1.877288 | 808 |
| ZTF (1) | 1.8 10−5 | 1.2 10−5 | 352 |
| ZTF (2) | 2.5 10−5 | 2.6 10−5 | 138 |
| ZTF (3) | 7.8 10−5 | 3.0 10−6 | 735 |
| ZTF (4) | 6.979322 | 1.3 10−5 | 366 |
| HD (1) | 2.6 10−5 | 1.7 10−5 | 95 |
| V772 (1) | 3.5 10−4 | 1.1 10−2 | 10 |
| HD (2) | 0.998183 | 1.0 10−6 | 71 |
Notes. Absolute differences between the frequencies identified by the Lomb-Scargle and kernel regression periodograms compared to literature values for the same sources as Table 1.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.