Open Access

This article has an erratum: [https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450750e]


Table 6.

Apsidal motion and/or orientation parameters from AME and dynamical fits.

TIC no. Panom a1 e1 ω1 τ1 Papse im i1 i2 ΔΩ Pnode
(days) (R) (deg) (MJD) (years) (deg) (deg) (deg) (deg) (years)
198241524 0.77515141(7) 4.84(5) 0 0 80 80 0 −67
199616648 14.078392(3) 25(5) 0.088(5) 107(1) 58707.87(6) 122 8(2) 89 93 6(4) −98
219771659 14.494829(2) 33.7(2) 0.2716(4) 2(2) 58675.77(8) 902 21(1) 89 89 21(1) −288
219788156 (a) 7.8244736(8) 21(3) 0 0 89(2) 89 0 −6373
219885468 (b) 7.547063(7) 21.8(4) 0.052(6) 266(1) 58686.75(2) 20 0 88 88 0 −14
219892913 3.5445656(4) 11(2) 0.014(1) 205(7) 58679.39(7) 317 2(4) 88 86.8 −1(3) −285
229594479 1.9375300(2) 7.8(7) 0 0 87 87 0 −1831
229785001 (c) 5.28(2) 0.0005(3) 84(60) 58683.0(1) 3(1) 87.7(6) 89.23(4) 3(1)
230012179 8.9235427(4) 25(2) 0.031(5) 91.0(3) 58670.490(9) 5103 0 89 89 0 −3880
233073872 (d) 14.142051(9) 41(1) 0.039(2) 139(3) 58665.5(1) 254 0 89 89 0 −213
233530543 1.6215143(4) 8.3(4) 0 0 86 86 0 −339
233684019 (e) 7.2836669(8) 20.7(9) 0.0074(5) 84.2(4) 58680.575(8) 67 8(2) 92 89 8(2) −41
233729038 (f) 11.404789(1) 31(2) 0.013(2) 72(4) 58706.6(1) 148 18(7) 89 97 16(7) −149
233738966 9.2715706(4) 26.6(8) 0.134(2) 298.9(6) 58677.71(1) 230 8(3) 89 82 2(2) −177
235687051 3.4324994(3) 15.9(9) 0 0 89 89 0 −95
235934882 6.8382380(8) 20.4(5) 0.00250(3) 351(2) 58680.93(3) 29 0 89 89 0 −22
236769201 (g) 6.3781832(6) 20.3(6) 0.009(5) 5(5) 58679.60(8) 42 0 87 87 0 −33
236774836 (h) 15.49633(3) 36(3) 0.194(5) 236(1) 58683.12(4) 9.6 5(2) 89 84 3(2) −8.2
237234024 1.89575417(6) 9.0(6) 0 0 86 86 0 −171
243337122 10.937381(1) 30(2) 0.26(2) 252(2) 58677.21(5) 3861 26(4) 89 69 −17(5) −2969
256514937 5.3294342(2) 19.9(4) 0.0260(8) 56(2) 58682.38(2) 142 23(1) 89 110 −10(1) −52
259004910 (f) 12.607183(2) 27(2) 0.14758(8) 357.5(6) 58678.37(2) −1640 45(4) 93 94 45(4) −1824
259271740 11.751674(1) 36(2) 0.316(8) 230(1) 58674.09(2) 3950 31(5) 92 90 −31(5) −2778
272705788 7.2566190(2) 19.3(2) 0.151(2) 181(1) 58678.68(2) −1468 43(1) 89 96 42(1) −1191
288611133 (f) 16.129992(5) 40(3) 0.21(1) 38(17) 58678.1(9) −1531 37(4) 89 113 −29(5) −651
288611883 1.0104071(4) 4.7(1) 0 0 89 89 0 −625
356014478 (i) 9.524509(6) 20(3) 0 0 89 89 0 −47
356896561 2.25336107(2) 10.5(9) 0 58(7) 85.3 135.7 −33(6) −3825
357686232 7.3089470(3) 20.1(5) 0.0654(6) 333(1) 58680.54(2) 284 3(3) 89.7 87.9 −3(3) −147
376976908 34.77571(3) 55(5) 0.092(4) 107.2(8) 58646.09(9) 886 22(1) 89 111 4(2) −358
389966039 (j) 6.836605(8) 23(1) 0.13(2) 67(3) 58677.43(9) 28 0 88 88 0 −19
392569978 39.44786(2) 80(1) 0.28(1) 228(2) 58662.4(2) 4506 15(2) 89 92 −15(2) −2698
392572173 12.151180(2) 38(2) 0.39(2) 322(6) 58710.1(1) 2680 51(6) 89 52 38(5) −6275
402656423 1.5192070(2) 7.7(7) 0 0 80 80 0 −80
417701432 (f) 9.366882(9) 29(2) 0.22(2) 241(3) 58676.06(6) 312 14(4) 89 78 9(6) −158
420177014 3.25855942(3) 11.0(9) 0 0 0 88 88 0 −1719
420263614 12.010766(4) 37(1) 0.3908(6) 190.5(4) 58732.908(8) 2055 56(4) 86.4 129.4 39(3) −314
423927178 4.79262(2) 17(1) 0 0 88 88 0 −11
441738417 (k) 0.67657755(2) 3.3(1) 0 0 89 89 0 −288
441768471 (f) 27.296093(5) 48(1) 0.0687(3) 46.7(2) 58674.99(2) 492 20.8(2) 89 98.1 −18.8(2) −254
459969365 9.008075(2) 24(5) 0.012(2) 28(17) 58681.1(4) 153 4(5) 88.6 89.5 4(5) −131

Notes.

(a)

Allowing a noncoplanar solution resulted in im = 43° ±10°, but we do not trust in it.

(b)

Adjusted mutual inclination resulted in im = 23° ±7°, which would lead to Δi1 ∼ 27° during TESS observations and hence is certainly overestimated.

(c)

Third-body eclipses; 2 + 1 + 1 configuration; photodynamical solution from Rappaport et al. (2023).

(d)

Adjusted mutual inclination resulted in im = 22° ±7°, which would lead to Δi1 ∼ 4° during TESS observations and hence is certainly overestimated.

(e)

Grazing third-body eclipses + EDV.

(f)

Eclipse depth variation.

(g)

Adjusted mutual inclination resulted in im = 11° ±2°, which would lead to Δi1 ∼ 6° during TESS observations and hence is certainly overestimated.

(h)

Disappearing eclipses.

(i)

Adjusted mutual inclination resulted in im = 13° ±7°, which would lead to Δi1 ∼ 9° during TESS observations and hence is certainly overestimated.

(j)

No secondary ETV curve.

(k)

Third-body eclipses.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.