Open Access
Table 11.
Comparison of the present results with literature values for the PLC relations.
Relation | Galaxy | Sample | α | σα | β | σβ | γ | σγ | RMS | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(mag) | (mag) | (mag dex−1) | (mag dex−1) | (mag) | ||||||
PLCVK | LMC | BLHer+WVir | 17.33 | 0.05 | −2.48 | 0.04 | 0.125 | 0.04 | 0.09 | R15 |
PLCVK | LMC | BLHer+WVir | 17.30 | 0.01 | −2.45 | 0.03 | 0.118 | 0.03 | 0.09 | TW |
PLCJK | LMC | BLHer+WVir | 17.39 | 0.04 | −2.45 | 0.04 | 0.35 | 0.14 | 0.09 | R15 |
PLCJK | LMC | BLHer+WVir | 17.25 | 0.01 | −2.49 | 0.03 | 0.69 | 0.10 | 0.08 | TW |
Notes. The form of the PLC relations is: . “R15” refers to Ripepi et al. (2015), “TW” (grey line) refers to this work.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.