Table D.3
Posterior of the light curve fits of CHEOPS and TESS with the Cos+Kelp,refl model
| Dataset | ||
|---|---|---|
| Parameter | CHEOPS (Cos+Kelp,refl) | TESS (Cos+Κelp,refl) |
| Orbital model | ||
| ρ*[ρ⊙] | 0.239 ± 0.013 | 0.271 ± 0.015 |
| P [days] | 1.80988142 ± 2.110−7 | 1.80988130 ± 3.0 10−7 |
| tic [TBJD] | 2371.070518 ± 3.5 10−5 |  |
| cos i | (6.64 ± 0.60) 10−3 | (6.56 ± 0.61) 10−3 |
| a/R* | 3.998 ± 0.035 | 4.083 ± 0.038 |
| e cos ω | 0.0021 ± 0.0015 | 0.0000 ± 0.0015 |
| e sin ω | 0.0299 ± 0.0090 |  |
| e | 0.0301 ± 0.0089 |  |
| ω [deg] |  |
 |
| Transit model | ||
| Rp/R* | 0.10920 ± 0.00010 | 0.10885 ± 0.00014 |
| u1 | _0.020 ± 0.012 | −0.011 ± 0.013 |
| u2 | 0.821 ± 0.010 | 0.9408 ± 0.0080 |
| u3 |  |
−0.465 ± 0.011 |
| u4 | −0.1146 ± 0.0026 | 0.0359 ± 0.0074 |
| Phase curve model: Cos | ||
| A0 [ppm] | 111 ± 22 | 224 ± 19 |
| Fn [ppm] | <42 | <36 |
| ϕ0 [deg] |  |
 |
| Phase curve model: Kelp,refl | ||
 |
 |
|
| g |  |
 |
| ω0 |  |
 |
| ω′ |  |
 |
| ω0 + ω′ |  |
 |
| x1 [ο] |  |
 |
| x2 [ο] |  |
 |
| Instrumental model | ||
| c | 0.02801 ± 0.00023 | 0.0371 ± 0.0016 |
| σinst [ppm] | 236 ± 3.1 |  |
As mentioned in Section 4.2, when an estimate and uncertainty are provided, it corresponds to the median and the 68% confidence interval estimated with the 16th and 84th percentiles of the posterior probability density function. When an upper limit is provided, it corresponds to the 99.7th percentile, except for the parameters of the Kelp,refl PC model for with we use 68th percentile (see footnote b).
We chose not to provide the instrumental offset (ΔF/F)* in this table. There is one such offset for each dataset. This corresponds to 29 offsets for CHEOPS, 3 for TESS, 7 for IRAC1 and 3 for IRAC2. This will overcrowd the table. Furthermore, the value of these parameters doesn’t carry a lot of information.
(a) The posterior distribution of the eccentricity peaks slightly before 0. For this reason, we provide both the estimate with its 68% confidence interval and the upper limit at 99.7% confidence.
(b)For the parameters of the Kelp,refl model the uncertainties are large and using the 99.7th percentile as upper limit and the 0.3th percentile as lower limit would be informative. As such we decided to provide the 68th percentile as upper limit and the 32nd percentile as lower limit in these cases.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.