Open Access

Table 3.

Timing parameters from the NICER and XMM-Newton observation.

NICER XMM-Newton
Nphoton 55 375 10 374
Energy range [keV] 0.3–2.0 0.2–2.0
ΔT(a) [s] 246 057 36 349
νLS, minνLS, max [Hz] 0.0167–100 0.0167–3.33
LS significance (b) 5.4σ 6.7σ
ΔνGL [μHz] 20 20
5 × 1031 5 × 1048
pν1, ν2 [%] (c) ≈100 ≈100
Frequency [Hz] 0.07838754(10) 0.0783879(5)
Period [s] 12.757129(16) 12.75707(7)
Pulsed-fraction (d) [%] 10.7 ± 1.2 29.1 ± 2.6
Time-of-phase zero (e) 60 032.590341 60 133.582978

Notes.

(a)

Time between first and last photon.

(b)

For the fundamental peak, we show the significance that the observed Lomb-Scargle power is not due to white noise. The chance that the observed peak is due to noise was computed from the false-alarm probability (Baluev 2008).

(c)

Probability of detection of a periodic signal in the frequency interval we probed. Computed via , with (see Zavlin et al. 2000, for more details).

(d)

Computed from the maximum and minimum light-curve count-rate values (R) via (Fig. 3).

(e)

Reference time in MJD used to align the NICER and XMM-Newton pulse profiles.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.