Table A.1
Most extreme outliers: sources with largest estimation errors in flux by DDPM
| Data Type | Ra | Dec | Flux (µJy) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Real | 150.192944 | 3.995500 | 309 |
| Real | 150.192944 | 3.995500 | 429 |
| Predicted | 150.192945 | 3.995501 | 738 |
| Real | 149.655167 | 3.643278 | 238 |
| Real | 149.655167 | 3.643278 | 113 |
| Predicted | 149.655165 | 3.643277 | 346 |
| Real | 148.163222 | 1.370722 | 126 |
| Real | 148.163222 | 1.370444 | 400 |
| Predicted | 148.163220 | 1.370729 | 399 |
| Predicted | 148.163223 | 1.370444 | 436 |
Note: These outliers are from the Figures 14 and 15. The proposed algorithm fails when sources are overlapping each other. When there is exact overlap, the prediction is a source with a flux that is approximately equal to the sum of the fluxes of the overlapping true sources (first two sections).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.