Open Access

Table 1.

Summary of the amount of clusters in the each of the comparison samples and their overlap with the homogeneous XMM-Newton and CoMaLit clusters.

Sample Redshift Type of mass # of clusters # of clusters in common # of clusters in common
with the XMM-Newton sample with the CoMaLit sample
Ettori+2010 0.092 < z < 0.307 HSE 44 24
Landry+2013 0.152 < z < 0.3017 HSE 35 19
LoCuSS 0.152 < z < 0.3 HSE and lensing 50 22 45
Mahdavi+2013 0.152 < z < 0.55 HSE and lensing 50 18 44
Mahdavi+2008 0.170 < z < 0.547 HSE and lensing 18 11 17
Israel+2014 0.35 < z < 0.80 HSE and lensing 8 0 8
LPSZ+CLASH 0.55 < z < 0.89 Lensing 3 3
Bartalucci+2018 0.933 < z < 1.066 Lensing 4 3

All 94 120
All without repetition 36 82

Notes. We also report the total amount of matches, that is, the data points in Fig. 1 and the number of different objects.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.