Open Access

Fig. A.1.

image

Download original image

Comparison of HSE and lensing mass estimates from the homogeneous samples in this work (XMM-Newton and CoMaLit) with respect to other estimates from the literature (comparison sample). Top: Relation between X-ray masses from literature and from the XMM-Newton reference pipeline without accounting for . In the left (right) the clusters with very large uncertainties and with very different XMM-Newton and CoMaLit centres are considered (not considered). Bottom: Same figure as Fig. 1, but not accounting for clusters with very large uncertainties and with very different XMM-Newton and CoMaLit centres. The dashed lines show the 1:1 relation. We give the statistical, systematic, and raw variances in units of 1028 corresponding to the data points in each figure.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.