Table 1
Comparison of Pearson correlation coefficients and ConTEST results for ASID-FE models applied to real MeerLICHT images.
| Method | x | y | Flux | Consistency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | 0.896 | 0.913 | 0.998 | Rejected |
| Scratch | 0.956 | 0.952 | 0.999 | Not rejected |
Notes. The Direct model was trained on synthetic images, while the Scratch model was retrained using SourceExtractor’s predictions. Correlation coefficients assess the alignment of predicted x and y source positions and flux values between ASID-FE and SourceExtractor. The ConTEST analysis evaluates the consistency between the two methods’ predictions.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.