Open Access
Table 1.
Comparison of ESTER with the observations.
| Parameter | Burssens et al. (2023) | 2D model |
|---|---|---|
| M⋆ | 12 ± 1.5 M⊙ | 12 M⊙ |
| Z |
 |
0.012 |
| X | 0.71 | 0.71 |
| Xc |
 |
0.168 |
| fCBM |
 |
– |
| τ |
 Myr |
14.75 Myr |
| mcc |
 M⊙ |
2.59 M⊙ |
| log(L/L⊙) | 4.30 ± 0.07 | 4.36 |
| Teff, p | 23 900 ± 900 K | 25 892 K |
| Teff, e | 25 604 K | |
| Ωcore/(2π) |
 |
0.40 d−1 |
| Ωsurf/(2π) | 0.20 ± 0.01 d−1 | 0.20 d−1 |
| (Ω/Ωc)ini | – | 0.15 |
| R⋆, p |
 |
7.57 R⊙ |
| R⋆, e | 7.64 R⊙ | |
Notes. Stellar parameters of HD 192575 derived by Burssens et al. (2023) and those of the ESTER model for this same star. The parameters above the horizontal line are input for the model, while those below are output.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.