Open Access

Table E.3.

Comparing the SigMA clusters with Kerr et al. (2021) clusters toward Sco-Cen.

SigMA Name (SigMA) Nra TLCb EOMc LEAFd Name (KRK21)e
1 rho Oph/L1688 535 22(308) 17(272) I(109) US-I-rho Oph
2 nu Sco 150 22(91) 17(90) E(54) US-E
3 delta Sco 691 22(414) 17(378) F(1)H(102)I(1) US-H
4 beta Sco 285 22(167) 17(137) G(29) US-G
5 sigma Sco 544 22(296) 17(248) A(1)C(17)D(22) US-C/D
6 Antares 502 22(292) 17(239) A(1)B(11)C(1)F(24) US-B/F
7 rho Sco 240 22(128) 17(64) A(9) US-A
8 Scorpio-Body 373 22(193) 16(12)17(45) EOM-16/US
9 US-foreground 276 22(111) 13(30) EOM-13

10 V1062-Sco 1029 22(503) 14(20)15(347) LowerSco/EOM-14
11 mu Sco 54 22(28) 15(23) LowerSco
12 Libra-South 71 22(23)
13 Lupus-1-4 226 22(143) 12(102) A(46)B(14) Lupus-IV/III
14 eta Lup 769 22(411) 9(15)22(102)23(6) EOM-9/22/23
15 phi Lup 1114 22(391) 17(4)19(10)23(6) EOM-19/23
16 Norma-North 42 22(4)
17 e Lup 516 22(257) 11(1)20(76)21(8) EOM-20
18 UPK606 131 21(1)22(53) 11(32) UPK606
19 rho Lup 246 22(123) 21(2)25(10) EOM-25
20 nu Cen 1737 22(573) 11(3)21(2)24(108)26(14)27(2) EOM-24

21 sig Cen 1805 22(987) 25(1)26(26)27(421) C(4)D(12)E(48) EOM-26/LCC-D/E
22 Acrux 394 22(258) 27(208) B(1)C(96) LCC-C-Crux S
23 Musca-foreground 95 22(65) 27(46) B(16) LCC-B
24 eps Cham 39 22(23) 27(20) A(17) LCC-A-eps Cha
25 eta Cham 30 22(18) 18(17) eta Cha

26 B59 32 22(14) 6(13) Pipe
27 Pipe-North 42 22(19)
28 tet Oph 98 22(49) 10(28) Theia67

29 CrA-Main 96 22(53) 8(52) CrA
30 CrA-North 351 22(207) 7(1)8(195) CrA
31 Scorpio-Sting 132 22(62) 7(11) EOM-7

32 Centaurus-Far 99 21(36) 3(30) Cen-South
33 Chamaeleon-1 192 21(101) 1(101) Cha-1
34 Chamaeleon-2 54 21(30) 2(30) Cha-2

35 L134/L183 24 22(6)
36 Oph Southeast 61 4(20) Oph Southeast

Notes. Only those SigMA groups that have matches with KRK21 are given here, while Oph-North-Far is the only SigMA cluster without matches.

a

Number of sources from this work, for a direct comparison with the number of cross-matches as given in brackets in Cols. 4–6.

b

Col. 4 lists the TLC group labels if there are matches with SigMA, with the number of cross-matches in brackets. There have been only matches with the TLC groups 4, 21, and 22.

c

Col. 5 lists the EOM group labels if there are matches with SigMA, with the number of cross-matches in brackets, while each EOM represents a subclustering within a lower level TLC group.

d

The letters in Col. 6 correspond to LEAF subgroups, with the number of cross-matches in brackets, while a LEAF group represents a subclustering within a lower-level EOM group. Leaves only exist for the EOM groups 12 (Lupus), 17 (US), and 27 (LCC).

e

Group names from KRK21, if there is a significant overlap with SigMA. Only the (sub)group with the most significant number of cross-matches is given (in a few cases more than one), as apparent from the numbers in brackets in Cols. 5 & 6. See more details in Sect. 5.2.2.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.