Table 5.
Results of the fit for cases 1, 3, and 6 of the frequency variation (freq.) and the second differences (diff.).
| Xc |
 [μHz] |
 [μHz] |
Fit | Amax [μHz] | td ( * ) [s] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.25 | 1232.6 | 65.1 | Th. | 0.232 | 3931 |
| Freq. |
 |
 |
|||
| Diff. |
 (a) |
 |
|||
| 0.15 | 1091.4 | 59.8 | Th. | 0.204 | 3757 |
| Freq. |
 |
 |
|||
| Diff. |
 (a) |
 |
|||
| 0.05 | 982.2 | 55.5 | Th. | 0.190 | 3575 |
| Freq. |
 |
 |
|||
| Diff. |
 (a) |
 |
|||
Notes. ( * )Because both methods provide the acoustic depth τd of the glitch, the acoustic radius td is calculated from td = t0 − τd, with t0 = 1/(2Δν).
The amplitudes are obtained by dividing 
by ff21(νmax obtained for the second differences (see Appendix C).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.