Table 2.
Best-fit parameters of the fitted models.
tbabs*Model | NH | NH, pcf | pcf | Γ/kT/M | N1 | Ng1 | Ng2 | χ2/d.o.f. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
×1022 | ×1022 | ×10−6 | ×10−6 | |||||
4XMM J174917.7–283329 | ||||||||
po |
![]() |
0.9 ± 0.2 |
![]() |
152/108 | ||||
po+g1+g2 |
![]() |
1.0 ± 0.2 |
![]() |
2 ± 1 | 4 ± 2 | 130/106 | ||
tbpcf*(po+g1+g2) | 4 ± 1 |
![]() |
![]() |
2.3 ± 0.6 |
![]() |
![]() |
4 ± 3 | 109/104 |
tbpcf*(apec+g1) | 2.9 ± 0.7 |
![]() |
0.6 ± 0.1 |
![]() |
1.2 ± 0.2 × 10−3 | 2 ± 1 | 117/105 | |
tbpcf(mcvspec+g1) |
![]() |
![]() |
0.6 ± 0.1 |
![]() |
![]() |
2 ± 1 | 113/105 | |
4XMM J174954.6–294336 | ||||||||
po |
![]() |
0.4 ± 0.2 |
![]() |
209/149 | ||||
po+g1+g2 |
![]() |
0.6 ± 0.2 | 4 ± 1 × 10−5 | 3 ± 1 | 3 ± 2 | 180/147 | ||
tbpcf*(po+g1+g2) |
![]() |
![]() |
0.6 ± 0.3 |
![]() |
![]() |
4 ± 2 | 3 ± 2 | 173/145 |
tbpcf*(apec+g1) |
![]() |
![]() |
0.7 ± 0.1 | 35 ± 16 |
![]() |
4 ± 2 | 182/146 | |
tbpcf(mcvspec+g1) |
![]() |
![]() |
0.7 ± 0.1 |
![]() |
![]() |
4 ± 2 | 177/146 |
Notes. NH is given in units of 1022 cm−2, kT in keV, and M in M⊙. For the apec and mcvspec models, the metal abundance value is fixed at 1.0. In the mcvspec model, we fixed B and ṁ to 10 MG and 5 gm cm−2 s−1, typical values for low magnetized WDs. Due to a lack of good-quality data, we had to fix the centroid of the Gaussian lines; otherwise, it takes random values while fitting.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.