Fig. F.1.

Download original image
Posterior distributions for some analytical model parameters (smooth potential and smooth source), based on parameter covariance matrices computed either from the FIM or via HMC sampling (see Sect. 2.6). The three colors correspond to the three mocks of Fig. 3: localized subhalo (LS), popluation of subhalos (PS) and high-order moments (HM). Dot-dashed distributions in the upper right triangle correspond to fully smooth models, while distributions in the lower left triangle correspond to models including a pixelated component to account for perturbations of the smooth potential. Parameters are, from left to right: Einstein radius of the lens θE, ellipticity of the smooth lens potential {e1, ψ, e2, ψ}, external shear components {γ1, ext, γ2, ext}, central intensity of the source ISersic, half-light radius reff, Sérsic index of the source nSersic, ellipticity of the source {e1, s, e2, s}, position of the source {xs, ys}. Overall, parameter biases are reduced after including a pixelated component in the potential to model deviations from smoothness; however, some still remain, in particular for lens LS, for which turning to an analytical model informed by the pixelated model is warranted.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.