Open Access

Fig. B.3.

image

Download original image

Reliability of the LAGN,torus estimations using the X-CIGALE mock catalogues for sources with and without MIR bands. Top panel: Measurements of the LAGN,torus(erg s−1) parameter with and without W4 or MIPS data. The two measurements of LAGN,torus(erg s−1) are in good agreement (ρtorus = 0.800). The dashed line presents the 1:1 relation. Middle panel: Estimated versus true values provided by the best-fit model, for LAGN,torus(erg s−1), for the three fields used in our analysis. The filled (open) symbols represent the X-XIGALE runs with (without) MIR data. The errors on the estimated values increase when the analysis lacks MIR data. The mean value of the error on log[LAGN,torus(erg s−1)] is 0.27 dex without MIR, compared to ∼0.15 dex when MIR data are used. Bottom panel: Distributions of the difference between true and estimated values, with and without MIR data. The dispersion increases when W4 or MIPS1 are absent, but the estimated LAGN,torus(erg s−1) values are still consistent with the true values.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.