Open Access

Table 4.

Best-fit values for the size-mass and MS relations fitted on the MS sample.

Sub-sample Scaling relation Selection Nb. Prop. (%) α β
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Field Size-Mass 250 (6) 57 0.33 0.23 ± 0.02
Small 54 (2) 13 0.22 ± 0.03
Large 133 (2) 30 0.19 ± 0.02

Field Size-Mass (vi) 237 (3) 63 0.41 0.26 ± 0.02
Small 48 (2) 13 0.24 ± 0.04
Large 93 (3) 24 0.24 ± 0.02
Field Size-Mass (vi), (vii) 77 (1) 45 0.34 0.26 ± 0.03
Large 84 (2) 49 0.23 ± 0.02

Field MS 251 (5) 58 0.61 −0.19 ± 0.02
Small 55 (1) 13 −0.22 ± 0.05
Large 126 (9) 29 −0.36 ± 0.03

Field MS (vi) 239 (1) 63 0.78 −0.18 ± 0.02
Small 47 (3) 13 −0.15 ± 0.06
Large 91 (5) 24 −0.29 ± 0.04
Field MS (vi), (vii) 78 (0) 45 0.72 0.22±0.04
Large 83 (3) 48 0.32±0.04

Notes. Optionally, we apply a mass cut M ≤ 1010 M (vi) and a redshift cut 0.5 ≤ z ≤ 0.9 (vii). For each fit, the slope is fixed to the one from LTSFIT on the entire MS sample using the same selection criteria. We do not show the small structure sub-sample when applying the redshift cut since there remain too few galaxies to reliably constrain its zero point. Bold values correspond to those shown in Figs. 11 and 12 (full lines). (1) Sub-sample name, (2) scaling relation fitted, (3) selection criteria applied, (4) number of galaxies in each sub-sample, with outliers shown in parentheses, (5) proportion of galaxies in each sub-sample (after removing outliers), (6) fixed slope, and (7) best-fit zero point. Errors on fit parameters correspond to 1σ uncertainties.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.