Free Access

Table 3

Model comparison for RVs based on Bayesian log evidence.

Model
No planet
0P –213.3 –6.0
Two-signal models (without activity modelling)
2P(2.6 d, 14.3 d) –211.2 –3.9
2P(2.6 d-ecc, 14.3 d) –211.8 –4.5
2P2.6 d, 14.3 d-ecc) –211.2 –3.9
2P(2.6 d-ecc, 14.3 d-ecc) –212.1 –4.8
Three-signal models (with activity modelling)
2P(2.6 d, 14.3 d) + dSHO-GP(120 d) -207.3 0.0
2P(2.6 d-ecc, 14.3 d) + dSHO-GP(120 d) –207.7 –0.4
2P(2.6 d, 14.3 d-ecc) + dSHO-GP(120 d) –208.0 –0.7
2P(2.6 d-ecc, 14.3 d-ecc) + dSHO-GP(120 d) –208.7 –1.4

Notes. The bold font denotes the model that was used in the joint fit.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.