Table 2.
Results from the analysis of the duplicated sources.
| Survey | Known | Possible | True duplicates | True duplicates | True duplicates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| duplicates | duplicates | q = 99% | q = 97.5% | 3σ | |
| APOGEE | 64 398 | 476 | 464 | 464 | 381 |
| GALAH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GES | 0 | 68 | 64 | 62 | 58 |
| LAMOST | 1 751 152 | 529 059 | 520 310 | 518 142 | 469 008 |
| RAVE | 113 964 | 14 461 | 14 371 | 14 367 | 14 105 |
Notes. The known duplicates are the stars with the same identification name provided from each survey. The possible duplicates are defined from the XM process. True duplicates are confirmed to be below the cut-off with 3 different criteria (q = 99%, q = 97.5%, 3σ). These stars are now treated as duplicated sources assigned with a new identification.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.