Table A.1
Some of the disk population studies done with ALMA. The approximate ages and mean distances are shown together with the total number of targets and the number of these targets that are Herbigs in each survey.
Region | Age (Myr) | Distance (pc) | N | Herbigs | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Taurus | 2 | 140 | 210 | 3 | 1 |
Lupus | 1–3 | 150 | 93 | 1 | 2 |
σ Orionis | 3–5 | 385 | 92 | 0 | 3 |
λ Orionis | 5 | 400 | 44 | 1 | 4 |
Upper Scorpius | 5–11 | 145 | 106 | 0 | 5 |
Corona Australis | 1–3 | 154 | 41 | 2 | 6 |
Ophiuchus | 1 | 140 | 147 | 0 | 7, 8 |
OMC1 | 1 | 400 | 49 | 0 | 9 |
ONC | 1 | 400 | 104 | 0 | 10 |
Lynds 1641 | 1.5 | 428 | 101 | 0 | 11 |
Chamaeleon I | 2 | 160 | 93 | 0 | 12 |
IC 348 | 2–3 | 310 | 136 | 0 | 13 |
OMC 2 | 1 | 414 | 132 | 0 | 14 |
NGC 2024 | 0.5 | 414 | 179 | 0 | 15 |
This work | 6.2±3.5 | 201±111 | 36 | 36 |
Notes: An object is counted as an Herbig star if listed by Vioque et al. (2018). The given age and distance for this work are the mean ± standard deviation of the values given by Vioque et al. (2018). References: (1) Andrews et al. (2013), (2) Ansdell et al. (2016), (3) Ansdell et al. (2017), (4) Ansdell et al. (2020), (5) Barenfeld et al. (2016), (6) Cazzoletti et al. (2019), (7) Cieza et al. (2019), (8) Williams et al. (2019), (9) Eisner et al. (2016), (10) Eisner et al. (2018), (11) Grant et al. (2021), (12) Pascucci et al. (2016), (13) Ruíz-Rodríguez et al. (2018), (14) van Terwisga et al. (2019), (15) van Terwisga et al. (2020).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.