Table 3.
First part of the first ten entries in the RXGCC catalog.
| RXGCC | RA | Dec | Extent | Ext,ml | z | z,err | z,src ( * *) | C (†) | GC(XSZ,Δz < 0.01) (+) | GC(OPT,Δz < 0.01) (−) | GC (⋆) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J2000 [°] | J2000 [°] | [arcmin] | |||||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (11) | (12) |
| 1 | 0.026 | 8.279 | 2.13 | 56.61 | 0.0364 | 0.005 | z1, z_xsz | B | MCXC | N | C, F20, MCXC, N, SPI, W |
| 2 | 0.641 | 8.451 | 6.41 | 42.14 | 0.0961 | 0.005 | z1, z_xsz | B | F20, SPI | A, W | A, C, F20, N, SPI, W |
| 3 | 0.797 | −35.946 | 3.04 | 128.14 | 0.0493 | 0.005 | z1, z_xsz | B | MCXC, Tar, XB | A, N | A, MCXC, N, Tar, W, XB |
| 4 | 1.339 | 16.223 | 3.36 | 85.08 | 0.1154 | 0.005 | z1, z_xsz | B | F20, MCXC | C, N, RM, W | A, C, F20, MCXC, N, W |
| 5 | 1.497 | −34.702 | 2.12 | 55.62 | 0.1145 | 0.005 | z1, z_xsz | B | MCXC, PSZ2, Tar, XB | A, W | A, MCXC, N, PSZ2, Tar, W, XB |
| 6 | 1.585 | 10.866 | 1.73 | 28.41 | 0.1666 | 0.005 | z1, z_xsz | B | F20, MCXC, PSZ2, SPI, Tar | C, N, RM, W, Zw | C, F20, MCXC, N, PSZ2, SPI, Tar, W |
| 7 | 2.556 | 2.093 | 8.87 | 25.46 | 0.1577 | 0.005 | z1 | G | – | – | C, N, W |
| 8 | 2.700 | −81.160 | 6.66 | 26.49 | 0.1246 | 0.005 | z1, z_opt | S | – | W | W |
| 9 | 2.823 | −28.848 | 2.07 | 136.69 | 0.0616 | 0.005 | z1, z_xsz | B | MCXC, PSZ2, Tar, XB | A, W | A, MCXC, N, PSZ2, Tar, W, XB |
| 10 | 2.935 | 32.415 | 1.32 | 61.24 | 0.1036 | 0.005 | z1, z_xsz | B | F20, MCXC, PSZ2, SPI, Tar, XB | A, C, RM, W | A, C, F20, MCXC, PSZ2, SPI, Tar, W, XB |
Notes. (†)For simplicity, we use ‘G’, ‘S’, and ‘B’ for short for the Gold, Silver, and Bronze classes. (* *)The source of the redshift. ‘z1’ means the redshift comes from the highest peak of the redshift histogram of galaxies, while ‘z2’ for the second highest peak. ‘z_opt’ and ‘z_xsz’ shows the redshift of candidate matches with or comes from (when no ‘z1’ nor ‘z2’ available) the previous identified optical clusters or ICM-detected clusters. (+)Previously ICM-identified clusters within 0.5 Mpc, 15′ and Δz < 0.01: F20 (Finoguenov et al. 2020), Tak (Takey et al. 2011, 2013, 2014; Takey et al. 2016), SPI (Clerc et al. 2012, 2016, 2020; Kirkpatrick et al. 2021), XLSSC (Pacaud et al. 2016), SWXCS (Liu et al. 2015), XCS (Mehrtens et al. 2012), MCXC (Piffaretti et al. 2011), L03 (Ledlow et al. 2003), XB (XBACs, Ebeling et al. 1996), Tar (Tarrío et al. 2018, 2019), H18 (Hilton et al. 2018), PSZ2 (Planck Collaboration XXVII 2016), B15 (Bleem et al. 2015), H13 (Hasselfield et al. 2013), M11 (Marriage et al. 2011). (−)Clusters detected in optical or infrared band within 0.5 Mpc, 15′ and Δz < 0.01: C (CAMIRA, Oguri 2014; Oguri et al. 2018), Zw (Zwicky & Kowal 1968), RM (redMaPPer, Rykoff et al. 2014, 2016), W (Wen et al. 2012; Wen & Han 2015; Wen et al. 2018), A (Abell 1958; Abell et al. 1989), N for clusters from NED database. (⋆)The Abell clusters and ICM-detected clusters within 0.5 Mpc and 15′, regardless of their redshifts. (This table is available at the CDS. The first ten entries are shown here for its form and content).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.