Table B.1.
Comparison of the masses inferred using ACT data to those from SZ observations with CARMA (Gonzalez et al. 2019a), ACA (Di Mascolo et al. 2020), MUSTANG2 (Dicker et al. 2020), and NIKA2 (Ruppin et al. 2020).
| Cluster ID | M500,ACT | M500,ACA(a) | M500,CARMA(b) | M500, MUSTANG 2(c) | M500, NIKA 2(d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [1014 M⊙] | [1014 M⊙] | [1014 M⊙] | [1014 M⊙] | [1014 M⊙] | |
| MOO J0105+1324 |
 |
 |
 |
||
| MOO J0129−1640 |
 |
 |
|||
| MOO J0319−0025 |
 |
 |
|||
| MOO J1014+0038 |
 |
 |
 |
||
| MOO J1142+1527 |
 |
 |
 |
6.06 ± 3.47 | |
| MOO J1322−0228 |
 |
 |
|||
| MOO J1354+1329 |
 |
 |
|||
| MOO J1414+0227 |
 |
 |
|||
| MOO J1514+1346 |
 |
 |
|||
| MOO J1521+0452 |
 |
 |
|||
| MOO J2146−0320 |
 |
 |
|||
| MOO J2206+0906 |
 |
 |
|||
| MOO J2231+1130 |
 |
 |
Notes.
Dicker et al. 2020. A full treatment of the uncertainty is available in the publication.
The NIKA2 measurement, as reported in Ruppin et al. 2020, relied on a strong, informative prior on the integrated SZ signal from CARMA (Gonzalez et al. 2019a) and hence should likely not be regarded as an independent constraint. We include it for completeness, and note they include a large, 56% systematic uncertainty. All three surveys assumed the Arnaud et al. (2010) scaling relation.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.