Fig. 2
Comparison between the sample of IMTT stars in this paper with the HAeBe star sample from Vioque et al. (2018). Only stars up to 5 M⊙ are shown for the HAeBe stars in these panels. Upper panel: age-mass relation among the IMTT star sample in comparison with the Herbig star sample. The IMTT star sample is on average younger than the HAeBe stars with each mass bin. Lower panel: mass distribution in the IMTT star sample compared to the mass distribution among the HAeBe stars.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.