Free Access

Table 5.

Average offsets and standard deviation obtained for each galaxy subsample of size N where the chemical abundances could be compared (ΔO/H) between the various optical-based determinations and the HCM-IR estimates.

ΔO/H HCm DM PG16-R PG-16-S

Input lines in HCM-IR Mean σ N Mean σ N Mean σ N Mean σ N
All lines +0.02 0.10 5 +0.02 2 +0.05 0.14 4 +0.09 0.11 5
[Ne II]12.8, [Ne III]15.6, [S III]18.7, 33.5, [S IV]10.5, [O III]52, 88, [N II]122, [N III]57 +0.06 0.14 6 +0.01 0.10 6 +0.07 0.13 5 +0.10 0.10 6
[O III]52, 88, [N II]122, [N III]57 −0.07 0.19 12 +0.05 0.17 7 +0.11 0.13 7 +0.12 0.09 12
H I, [S III]18.7, 33.5, [S IV]10.5, [Ne II]12.8, [Ne III]15.6 +0.02 0.15 21 +0.08 0.14 11 0.00 0.17 18 0.00 0.17 20
[S III]18.7, 33.5, [S IV]10.5, [Ne II]12.8, [Ne III]15.6 +0.02 0.21 32 +0.03 0.24 22 −0.02 0.21 26 −0.03 0.23 30
[S III]18.7, 33.5, [S IV]10.5 +0.09 0.24 37 +0.11 0.27 27 −0.02 0.21 30 −0.03 0.22 34
[Ne II]12.8, [Ne III]15.6 −0.17 0.18 43 −0.18 0.25 22 −0.04 0.23 31 −0.04 0.23 40
[N II]122, [N III]57 −0.17 0.12 12 −40.14 2 +0.11 0.13 7 +0.12 0.09 12

Notes. The optical methods used are HCM from Pérez-Montero (2014), the direct method (DM) values provided by Madden et al. (2013), and the strong-line calibrations from Pilyugin & Grebel (2016), namely the R and S calibrations. The differences reported for the DM are estimated using only the sample of dwarf galaxies, where DM abundances are available (Madden et al. 2013).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.