Issue |
A&A
Volume 652, August 2021
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | C6 | |
Number of page(s) | 3 | |
Section | Extragalactic astronomy | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937173e | |
Published online | 24 August 2021 |
Studying the ISM at ∼10 pc scale in NGC 7793 with MUSE
I. Data description and properties of the ionised gas (Corrigendum)
1
Department of Astronomy, Oskar Klein Centre, Stockholm University, AlbaNova University Centre, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
e-mail: lorenza.dellabruna@astro.su.se
2
Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
3
Centre for Extragalactic Astronomy, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
4
Dipartimento di Fisica G. Occhialini, Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 3, 20126 Milano, Italy
5
Department of Astronomy, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88001, USA
6
Instituto de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica, UNAM, Campus Morelia, Michoacan CP 58089, Mexico
7
Department of Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
8
Sorbonne Université, CNRS, UMR 7095, Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, 75014 Paris, France
9
Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2611, Australia
10
Space Telescope Science Institute and European Space Agency, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 2121, USA
11
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
12
Instituto de Astronomía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Unidad Académica en Ensenada, Km 103 Carr. Tijuana–Ensenada, Ensenada 22860, Mexico
Key words: galaxies: ISM / HII regions / galaxies: individual: NGC 7793 / ISM: structure / errata, addenda
The parametrisation of the MUSE line spread function (LSF) provided in the original paper refers to the instrumental full width at half maximum (FWHM) and not to σ, as mentioned in the text and erroneously assumed when fitting the Hα line. Figure 1 shows the revised Hα velocity dispersion map. Figures 2 and 3 illustrate the updated ‘BPT-σ’ line ratio diagram and σHα distribution. For the latter distribution, we now recover median values (±first, third quartiles) of km s−1 and
km s−1. The general trends stated in the original paper remain unchanged.
![]() |
Fig. 1. Revised version of Fig. 3 from the original paper. |
![]() |
Fig. 2. Revised version of Fig. 18 from the original paper. |
![]() |
Fig. 3. Revised version of Fig. 19 from the original paper. |
In the original manuscript there has also been a mistake in the computation of the fraction of diffuse ionised gas (fDIG). The corrected fractions are the following: fDIG ∼ 15% (21%) for the Hα sample and fDIG ∼ 21% (27%) for the Hα/[S II] sample, where we have indicated the values prior to reddening correction in parenthesis.
© ESO 2021
All Figures
![]() |
Fig. 1. Revised version of Fig. 3 from the original paper. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 2. Revised version of Fig. 18 from the original paper. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 3. Revised version of Fig. 19 from the original paper. |
In the text |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.