Free Access

Table 1.

Estimated radial velocity (vr) of the CME ejecta leading edge on 3 April 2010.

Method (a) Spacecraft Imager λ(b) [°] Φ(b) [°] vr [km s−1]
at 15:29 UT (D(b)≈30 R) at 22:49 UT (D(b)≈60 R) Mean vr(c)
MCT STEREO-A/B HI1 ≈0 7 877 ± 33 834 ± 29 855 ± 33

Results of other methods in other publications
FP(1) STEREO-A HI1 0 9 950 ± 150 (d) 950 ± 150 (d)
FP(2) STEREO-A HI1/HI2 0 3 ± 4 800 ± 100 (d) 850 ± 100 (d) 829 ± 122
FP(3) STEREO-A HI1 0 5 ± 2 ≈800 (d) ≈700 (d)
HM(1) STEREO-A HI1 0 −5 950 ± 150 (d) 950 ± 150 (d)
HM(2) STEREO-A HI1/HI2 0 −25 ± 10 750 ± 100 (d) 950 ± 100 (d) 854 ± 100
HM(3) STEREO-A HI1 0 6 ± 2 ≈800 (d) ≈900 (d)
FP/HM(4) STEREO-A HI1 0 −8 1100 ± 100 (d) 950 ± 100 (d)
GT(5) STEREO-A/B HI1 0 10 900 ± 150 (d) 750 ± 200 (d)
SSEF(6) STEREO-A HI1/HI2 0 −19 915

Results of HELCATS((e), 7, 8)
FP STEREO-A HI1/HI2 −2 0 889 ± 17
FP STEREO-B HI1/HI2 −5 34 1149 ± 106
HM STEREO-A HI1/HI2 −2 −20 962 ± 24
HM STEREO-B HI1/HI2 −3 69 1368 ± 213
SSEF STEREO-A HI1/HI2 −2 −10 927 ± 20
SSEF STEREO-B HI1/HI2 −5 51 1248 ± 150

Notes.

(a)

The full names of the abbreviations of the methods are listed below, MCT: maximum correlation-coefficient localization and cross-correlation tracking technique, FP: fixed-Φ fitting method, HM: harmonic mean fitting method, GT: geometric rriangulation method, SSEF: self-similar expansion fitting method.

(b)

λ, Φ and D are the latitude, longitude, and heliocentric distance, respectively, in HEE coordinates.

(c)

The mean velocity of MCT method is calculated for a heliocentric distance (D) between 30 R and 60 R, while for the other methods, the mean velocity is derived by fitting the whole trace of the leading edge in HI images.

(d)

The velocity here is roughly estimated from the velocity images in corresponding papers.

(e)

Data is obtained from the Heliospheric Imager CME catalog and the CME kinematics catalog of HEliospheric Cataloging, Analysis and Techiques Service (HELCATS) (https://www.helcats-fp7.eu/index.html).

References. (1) Möstl et al. (2010); (2) Rollett et al. (2012); (3) Volpes & Bothmer (2016); (4) Xie et al. (2012); (5) Liu et al. (2011); (6) Möstl et al. (2014); (7) Davies et al. (2013); (8) Barnes et al. (2019).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.