Open Access

Table 3.

Robustness assessment.

Quantity Run Median 68% interval 95% interval Number of sources
Least-squares 0.86 0.128–1.50 2.83×10−6–7.0 783
Non-hierarchical Bayesian 0.92 0.0223–1.22 0.000164–3.7 798
No Planck and IRAS data 1.19 1.00–1.60 0.69–2.44 783
Galliano et al. (2011) AC mixture 0.91 0.69–0.97 0.51–1.15 798
Galliano et al. (2011) AC mixture 0.60 0.48–0.68 0.37–0.80 798
MBB with β = 1.79 0.85 0.61–1.08 0.35–1.39 798
MBB with β free 1.00 0.43–2.75 0.183–5.3 798
Draine & Li (2007) ISRF distribution 0.71 0.49–1.31 0.186–4.6 798
CIGALE 0.70 0.50–1.06 0.227–3.6 756

Notes. Statistics of the comparison between the reference run and the various tests of Figs. 46. The median, 68% and 95% intervals refer to the distribution of the quantity in the first column. See Sect. 3.3 for more details.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.