Table 6.
Residuals between our results and the literature.
Catalogue (a) | Temperature | log g | [Fe/H] | M/M⊙ | R/R⊙ | log L/L⊙ | N | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(K) | (cgs) | (dex) | |||||||||||||||||
μ | σμ | σ | μ | σμ | σ | μ | σμ | σ | μ | σμ | σ | μ | σμ | σ | μ | σμ | σ | ||
J11 | −4.09 | 7.56 | 69.82 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.16 | −0.06 | 0.01 | 0.07 | −0.28 | 0.01 | 0.27 | −0.02 | 0.02 | 1.03 | −0.021 | 0.001 | 0.090 | 166 |
J15 | 67.70 | 14.77 | 60.58 | −0.06 | 0.03 | 0.20 | −0.05 | 0.02 | 0.07 | −0.00 | 0.05 | 0.33 | 0.40 | 0.15 | 0.73 | −0.026 | 0.025 | 0.068 | 17 |
L07 (b) | −13.32 | 14.83 | 33.03 | −0.21 | 0.03 | 0.14 | −0.10 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.26 | 0.035 | 0.004 | 0.075 | 12 | |||
A15 (c) | 49.75 | 12.38 | 56.71 | −0.07 | 0.03 | 0.12 | −0.02 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 27 | |||||||||
W16 | 27.10 | 9.54 | 47.84 | −0.18 | 0.02 | 0.10 | −0.02 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.18 | −0.10 | 0.02 | 0.69 | −0.044 | 0.002 | 0.113 | 37 |
SC (d) | 43.47 | 20.25 | 53.23 | −0.01 | 0.05 | 0.15 | −0.05 | 0.02 | 0.06 | −0.25 | 0.07 | 0.50 | 17 | ||||||
Total (e) | 21.82 | 0.01 | 67.87 | −0.03 | 0.01 | 0.16 | −0.04 | 0.01 | 0.07 | −0.15 | 0.01 | 0.31 | −0.08 | 0.01 | 0.96 | −0.018 | 0.001 | 0.093 |
Notes. μ, σμ, and σ correspond to the mean, error in the mean, and standard deviation of the residual distribution, respectively. The last column shows the number of stars in common with each catalogue.
J11: Jones et al. (2011), J15: Jofré et al. (2015), L07: Luck & Heiter (2007), A15: Alves et al. (2015), W16: Wittenmyer et al. (2016c), SC: SWEET-Cat.
The parameters used correspond to the spectroscopic ones, and the mass obtained using the spectroscopic Teff.
Only the results from using the line-list from Tsantaki et al. (2013).
We only considered the data from their homogeneous sample, meaning that the parameters were derived following the uniform methodology described in Santos et al. (2013). The individual stars were analysed in Mortier et al. (2013), Andreasen et al. (2017), and Sousa et al. (2018).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.