Table B.3.
Literature data for stars used in the comparison with interferometry and asteroseismology.
| HIP | log g | Radius | Mass | Age | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (cgs) | (R⊙) | (M⊙) | (Gyr) | ||
| 343 | 2.54 ± 0.07 (a) | 10.69 ± 0.52 | 1.44 ± 0.18 | 3.50 ± 1.05 | 1 |
| 655 | 2.41 ± 0.09 (a) | 11.27 ± 0.77 | 1.19 ± 0.17 | 6.80 ± 3.11 | 1 |
| 3137 | 10.52 ± 0.24 | 2 | |||
| 4293 | 2.58 ± 0.05 (a) | 9.30 ± 0.32 | 1.19 ± 0.11 | 5.90 ± 1.82 | 1 |
| 4587 | 10.91 ± 0.28 | 2 | |||
| 8102 | 0.79 ± 0.00 (b) | 3 | |||
| 0.80 ± 0.00 | 4 | ||||
| 8928 | 11.17 ± 0.15 | 2 | |||
| 9440 | 10.59 ± 0.32 | 2 | |||
| 10234 | 11.17 ± 0.21 | 2 | |||
| 11791 | 10.57 ± 0.17 | 2 | |||
| 13147 | 10.45 ± 0.17 | 2 | |||
| 16537 | 0.74 ± 0.01 (b) | 3 | |||
| 19849 | 0.81 ± 0.00 (b) | 3 | |||
| 69673 | 1.42 ± 0.08 | 5 | |||
| 79672 | 1.03 ± 0.01 (b) | 3 | |||
| 89962 | 3.00 ± 0.05 | 5 | |||
| 92968 | 2.66 ± 0.11 | 5 | |||
| 95124 | 3.24 ± 0.04 (a) |
 |
 |
 |
6 |
| 95222 | 2.35 ± 0.04 | 5 | |||
| 98036 | 3.06 ± 0.02 | 4 | |||
| 3.53 ± 0.04 | 5 | ||||
| 102014 | 2.57 ± 0.09 (a) | 10.18 ± 0.76 | 1.40 ± 0.22 | 3.40 ± 1.32 | 1 |
| 103836 | 2.66 ± 0.05 (a) | 7.92 ± 0.30 | 1.04 ± 0.10 | 9.90 ± 2.59 | 1 |
| 105854 | 2.42 ± 0.04 (c) | 10.34 ± 0.55 (c) | 1.00 ± 0.16 (c) | 7.29 ± 3.06 (c) | 7 |
| 2.42 ± 0.07 (a) | 10.85 ± 0.65 | 1.13 ± 0.13 | 8.50 ± 3.33 | 1 | |
| 110813 | 3.29 ± 0.04 (a) |
 |
 |
 |
6 |
| 3.26 ± 0.01 | 4.61 ± 0.09 | 1.42 ± 0.07 | 2.90 ± 0.47 | 7 | |
| 114775 | 2.67 ± 0.10 (a) | 9.00 ± 0.65 | 1.38 ± 0.23 | 4.50 ± 1.55 | 1 |
| 116630 | 3.21 ± 0.05 | 4.34 ± 0.21 | 1.12 ± 0.12 | 7.40 ± 2.70 | 8 |
Notes. Only the quantities plotted in Figs. 4 and 5 are listed.
Surface gravity was not listed in the literature, but were computed from the given masses and radius.
Radius were not given in Tsantaki et al. (2013), but were computed from the temperature, angular size, and distance.
We used the values corresponding to the Red Clump solution for this star, as it is the most favourable solution based on the arguments presented by the authors.
Uncertainties where computed by adding both values listed in Aguirre et al. (2020).
References. (1) Aguirre et al. (2020)(d); (2) Gallenne et al. (2018); (3) Tsantaki et al. (2013); (4) Rains et al. (2020); (5) Morel et al. (2014); (6) North et al. (2017); (7) Campante et al. (2019); (8) Jiang et al. (2020).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.