Open Access

Table 3.

Results of the fits of the various TFR for reference samples and for MAGIC using fixed and free slopes.

Sample log(M* [M]) TFR Tracer Slope α β σint σtot d.o.f./Ngal
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
MAGIC >9.0 smTFR Vr22 Free 4.03 ± 0.63 9.79 ± 0.09 0.43 0.55 53/55
ORELSE smTFR Vr22 Free 3.18 ± 0.41 10.23 ± 0.09 0.48 0.63 75/77
MAGIC >9.0 smTFR Vr22 Fixed 3.18 9.85 ± 0.06 0.34 0.46 54/55
KROSS rotdom smTFR Vr22 Free 3.61 ± 0.31 10.61 ± 0.07 0.66 0.71 257/259
MAGIC >9.0 smTFR Vr22 Fixed 3.61 9.82 ± 0.07 0.38 0.50 54/55
KROSS disky smTFR Vr22 Free 4.42 ± 0.43 10.21 ± 0.04 0.34 0.45 110/112
MAGIC >9.0 smTFR Vr22 Fixed 4.42 9.76 ± 0.08 0.46 0.60 54/55

MAGIC >9.0 smTFR Vc22 Free 4.35 ± 0.59 9.51 ± 0.10 0.33 0.48 53/55
MAGIC >10.0 smTFR Vc22 Free 3.97 ± 1.32 9.65 ± 0.27 0.37 0.47 26/28
ORELSE smTFR Vc22 Free 3.24 ± 0.33 9.96 ± 0.06 0.37 0.51 75/77
MAGIC >9.0 smTFR Vc22 Fixed 3.24 9.65 ± 0.05 0.27 0.41 54/55
KMOS3D smTFR Vc22 Free 2.91 ± 0.28 9.96 ± 0.06 0.12 0.27 63/65
MAGIC >9.0 smTFR Vc22 Fixed 2.91 9.69 ± 0.05 0.26 0.39 54/55
MAGIC >10.0 smTFR Vc22 Fixed 2.91 9.85 ± 0.07 0.26 0.38 27/28
KMOS3D smTFR Vc22 Fixed 3.60 (a) 9.84 ± 0.04 0.17 0.32 64/65
MAGIC >9.0 smTFR Vc22 Fixed 3.60 9.60 ± 0.06 0.28 0.43 54/55
MAGIC >10.0 smTFR Vc22 Fixed 3.60 9.72 ± 0.08 0.32 0.44 27/28

MAGIC >9.0 bmTFR Vr22 Free 3.55 ± 0.49 9.99 ± 0.07 0.35 0.45 53/55

MAGIC >9.0 bmTFR Vc22 Free 3.74 ± 0.45 9.76 ± 0.08 0.25 0.38 53/55
MAGIC >10.0 bmTFR Vc22 Free 3.64 ± 1.06 9.83 ± 0.22 0.31 0.41 26/28
KMOS3D bmTFR Vc22 Free 2.21 ± 0.22 10.26 ± 0.05 0.01 0.23 63/65
MAGIC >9.0 bmTFR Vc22 Fixed 2.21 9.95 ± 0.04 0.21 0.31 54/55
MAGIC >10.0 bmTFR Vc22 Fixed 2.21 10.11 ± 0.06 0.20 0.30 27/28
KMOS3D bmTFR Vc22 Fixed 3.75 (b) 10.00 ± 0.04 0.19 0.33 64/65
MAGIC >9.0 bmTFR Vc22 Fixed 3.75 9.75 ± 0.05 0.24 0.38 54/55
MAGIC >10.0 bmTFR Vc22 Fixed 3.75 9.81 ± 0.08 0.31 0.42 27/28

Notes. For KMOS3D, we use uncertainties on stellar mass of 0.2 dex rather than the 0.15 dex used in Übler et al. (2017) in order to provide a better comparison to the other samples. The results for reference samples are provided without correction of the velocity due to the intrinsic axial ratio and without correction of the stellar mass. The latter correction would generate an offset of their zero-point of −0.15 dex. The average redshift is around 0.9 for all comparison samples used, slightly higher than the average redshift around 0.7 of the MAGIC final kinematic sample. (1) Identification of the sample used. Bold font indicates the MAGIC group TFR we consider as references. (2) Threshold used on the stellar mass. (3) Type of TFR studied. (4) Tracer used to infer the TFR. (5) Constraint on the slope. When fixed, the value of the slope used is the one indicated in Col. (6) and corresponds to the free slope of one of the comparison samples. (6) Value of the TFR slope. (7) Value of the TFR zero-point. (8) Intrinsic dispersion around the TFR obtained by enforcing the χ2 to be equal to unity. (9) Total dispersion around the TFR. (10) Number of degrees of freedom/number of galaxies.

(a)

Value from Reyes et al. (2011) used in Übler et al. (2017) to compare with local Universe.

(b)

Value from Lelli et al. (2016) used in Übler et al. (2017) to compare with local Universe.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.