Table A.2.
Comparison of fitted and predicted biases using different selection functions.
| Redshift range | Sky area | nD |
 |
b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 < z < 0.5 | Full | 1892 | 4.33 | 3.91 ± 0.14 |
| 0.1 < z < 0.3 | Full | 1250 | 3.95 | 3.68 ± 0.18 |
| 0.3 < z < 0.5 | Full | 642 | 5.08 | 6.64 ± 2.17 |
| 0.1 < z < 0.5 | Uniform | 1831 | 4.32 | 3.92 ± 0.16 |
| 0.1 < z < 0.3 | Uniform | 1206 | 3.94 | 3.66 ± 0.21 |
| 0.3 < z < 0.5 | Uniform | 625 | 5.06 | 7.02 ± 1.49 |
Notes. Column b is the fitted bias, 
is the mass-based prediction. “Full” indicates the whole CODEX survey area, and “Uniform” the subregion of uniform X-ray sensitivity. Column nD shows the number of clusters in each combination of redshift range and sky area.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.