Open Access

Table 4.

Comparison of the band positions (cm−1) for propynal from ab initio and density functional theory methods using a 6-311+G(d) basis set.

Symmetry Assignment Harmonic scaled (a) Anharmonic Experimental (b) Mode description
A′ v1 3456.3 3332.1 3326 ≡C–H stretch
A′ v2 2951.5 2769.1 2858 C–H(O) stretch
A′ v3 2195.2 2159.7 2106 C≡C stretch
A′ v4 1753.0 1721.4 1697 C–O stretch
A′ v5 1423.2 1432.5 1389 C–H(O) rock
A′ v6 956.9 940.8 944 C–C stretch
A′ v7 656.7 675.4 650 ≡C–H in-plane wag
A′ v8 631.3 630.7 614 C–C=0 in-plane bend
A′ v9 212.2 216.2 205 C–C≡C in-plane bend
A″ v10 1003.8 988.2 981 C–H(O)ut-plane wag
A″ v11 711.8 757.8 693 ≡C–H out-plane wag
A″ v12 273.3 279.1 261 C–C≡C out-plane bend

Notes.

(a)

B3LYP values scaled by 0.966.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.