Free Access

Table B.3

Comparison of the CEPAM-ToF5 and accelerated CMS results for two representative models.

Method J2 × 106 J4 × 106 J6 × 106 J8 × 106 J10 × 106 Z1 Z2 Z3 Mcore (M)
Error bar 0.0661 0.0114 0.0125 0.0278 0.0715

A ToF5-fit 14696.03 −586.5486 34.21185 −2.45856 0.20294 0.0049 0.0842 0.1442 4.97
B CMS 14686.19 −585.8723 34.15589 −2.45583 0.20186
A-B 9.84 −0.6763 0.05596 −0.00273 0.00108
C CMS-fit 14696.03 −586.5536 34.21111 −2.46086 0.20236 0.0051 0.0842 0.1442 4.94
A-C Offsets 0.00 0.0050 0.00074 0.00230 0.00058 −0.0002 0.0 0.0 0.03

D ToF5-fit 14696.03 −586.5465 34.26560 −2.46683 0.20392 0.0098 0.0536 0.1436 4.45
E CMS 14691.11 −586.1537 34.22964 −2.46572 0.20297
D-E 4.92 −0.3928 0.03596 −0.00111 0.00095
F CMS-fit 14696.03 −586.5462 34.26404 −2.46902 0.20331 0.0101 0.0537 0.1437 4.41
D-F Offsets 0.00 −0.0003 0.00156 0.00219 0.00061 −0.0003 −0.0001 −0.0001 0.04

Notes. The error bars of the gravitational harmonics are also listed for comparison.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.